Concerning the Landau pole in 3-3-1 models

theoretical physics

Abstract.

Some 3-3-1 models predict the existence of a non-perturbative regime at the TeV scale. We study in these models and their supersymmetric extensions, the energy at which the non-perturbative limit and a Landau-like pole arise. An order of magnitude for the mass of the extra neutral vector boson, \(Z^\prime\), present in these models is also obtained.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Particle Acceleration Vector Boson 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Pisano, V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 410; R. Foot, O.F. Hernandez, F. Pisano, V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 4158; P. Frampton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2889Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Pleitez, M.D. Tonasse, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2353 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.A. de S. Pires, O. Ravinez, Phys. Rev. D 58, 035008 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.B. Pal, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1659 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.G. Dias, V. Pleitez, M.D. Tonasse, Phys. Rev. D 67, 095008 (2003); A.G. Dias, V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 69, 077702 (2004); A.G. Dias, C.A. de S. Pires, P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, Phys. Rev. D 68, 115009 (2003) and references thereinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.C. Montero, V. Pleitez, M.C. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. D 65, 035006 (2002); hep-ph/0406299Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Dimopoulos, D.E. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B 531, 127 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Csáki, J. Erlich, G.D. Kribs, J. Terning, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075008 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Dimopoulos, D.E. Kaplan, N. Weiner, Phys. Lett. B 534, 124 (2002); T. Li, W. Liao, Phys. Rev. B 545, 147(2002);Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Chang, J.N. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 69, 056005 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Gogoladze, Y. Mimura, S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 554, 81 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Martinez, W.A. Ponce, L.A. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. D 65, 055013 (2002); W.A. Ponce, Y. Giraldo, L.A. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.C. Montero, V. Pleitez, M.C. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094076, 097505 (1998), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 1147, 2001; hep-ph/0204130; P.H. Frampton, A. Rasin, Phys. Lett. B 482, 129 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.A. Perez, G. Tavares-Velasco, J.J. Toscano, Phys. Rev. D 69, 115004 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Willmann it et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 49 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 61, 057903 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Dion, T. Gregoire, D. London, L. Marleau, H. Nadeau, Phys. Rev. D 59, 075006 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.B. Tully, G.C. Joshi, Phys. Lett. B 466, 333 (1999); E.M. Gregores, A. Gusso, S.F. Novaes, Phys. Rev. D 64, 015004 (2001); J.L. Garcia-Luna, G. Tavares-Velasco, J.J. Toscano, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093005 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L.D. Landau, in: Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, edited by W. Pauli (Pergamon Press, London, 1955), p. 52 and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Göckerler et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 4119 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Gies, J. Jaeckel, hep-ph/0405183Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996), Sect. 18.3Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Dashen, H. Neuberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1897 (1983); M.A.B. Bég, C. Panagiotakopoulos, A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 883 (1984); M. Lindner, Z. Phys. C 31, 295 (1986); J. Kuti, L. Lin, Y. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 678 (1988); P. Hasenfratz, J. Nager, Z. Phys. C 37, 477 (1988); M. Lüscher, P. Weisz, Phys. Lett. B 212, 472 (1988); T. Hambye, K. Riesselmann, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7255 (1997) and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Holland, hep-lat/0409112Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4805 (1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Jain, S.D. Joglekar, Phys. Lett. B 407, 151 (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.H. Frampton, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13, 2345 (1998). More recently a value of 4 TeV for the energy of the pole has been given in P.H. Frampton, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 1377 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.C. Montero, V. Pleitez, O. Ravinez, Phys. Rev. D 60, 076003 (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.R.T. Jones, Phys. Rev. D 25, 581 (1982); M.E. Machacek, M.T. Vaugh, Nucl. Phys. B 222, 83 (1983)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Das, P. Jain, Phys. Rev. D 69, 075001 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J.C. Montero, F. Pisano, V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2918 (1993); R. Foot, H.N. Long, T.A. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 50, R34 (1994); H.N. Long, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4691 (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    G. Tavares-Velasco, J.J. Toscano, hep-ph/0407047Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. Pisano, V. Pleitez, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3865 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de FísicaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloSP, Brazil
  2. 2.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  3. 3.Instituto de Física, TeóricaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaSão PauloSP, Brazil

Personalised recommendations