Advertisement

Localization of gauge fields in a tachyonic de Sitter thick braneworld

  • Alfredo Herrera-Aguilar
  • Alma D. Rojas
  • Elí Santos
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

In this work we show that universal gauge vector fields can be localized on the recently proposed 5D thick tachyonic braneworld which involves a de Sitter cosmological background induced on the 3-brane. Namely, by performing a suitable decomposition of the vector field, the resulting 4D effective action corresponds to a massive gauge field, while the profile along the extra dimension obeys a Schrödinger-like equation with a Pöschl–Teller potential. It turns out that the massless zero mode of the gauge field is bound to the expanding 3-brane and allows us to recover the standard 4D electromagnetic phenomena of our world. Moreover, this zero mode is separated from the continuum of Kaluza–Klein (KK) modes by a mass gap determined by the scale of the expansion parameter. We also were able to analytically solve the corresponding Schrödinger-like equation for arbitrary mass, showing that KK massive modes asymptotically behave like plane waves, as expected.

Keywords

Gauge Field Warp Factor Tachyon Field Cosmological Background Teller Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

1 Introduction and review of the thick tachyonic braneworld

The original proposal that extra dimensions can be non-compact [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] or even large [6, 7, 8] supplied new insights when attempting to solve the long standing cosmological constant problem [1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 10] and the intriguing gauge hierarchy problem [7, 8, 11, 12]. Subsequently, after the surprising success of the Randall–Sundrum models in addressing the mass hierarchy and 4D gravity localization problems [13, 14], during the last years, several braneworld configurations have been proposed in order to address different open problems in modern physics. Most of the braneworlds that generalize the original Randall–Sundrum setup make use of bulk scalar fields. In this framework, different kinds of scalar fields give rise to a wide range of scenarios [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. In particular, some authors have choosen a bulk tachyonic scalar field in order to address problems like the gauge hierarchy, the stabilization of the corresponding brane separation, and the localization of gravity and other matter fields [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. However, many attempts to solve the highly non-linear field equations that arise in these scalar–tensor systems lead to imaginary tachyon field configurations [41, 42] or to delocalization of gravity and other kinds of matter, like scalar and gauge vector fields (see, for instance, the tachyonic braneworlds constructed in [36, 37, 41] and references therein).

An interesting issue within the braneworld paradigm is related to the question of whether bulk matter fields can be confined to the brane by a natural mechanism. Usually, scalar fields and gravitons, as well as fermions, can be localized on branes of different types. However, within most of the so far proposed thin braneworlds, gauge vector fields cannot be localized on the 3-brane that represents our Universe by a gravitational trapping mechanism [43, 44, 45, 46]. Quite recently some new braneworlds endowed with different mechanisms for localizing gauge vector fields, either on Weyl thick branes [47, 48], on purely geometrical expanding (de Sitter) branes [49] or in anisotropically curved branes supported by phantom [50] and real scalar fields [51], were constructed. In particular, vector fields can be localized on the RS model in some higher-dimensional cases [52].

In this paper we use a recently proposed thick tachyonic braneworld configuration with a de Sitter metric induced on the brane and a decaying warp factor that enables the localization of 4D gravity [40], and show that universal gauge vector fields can also be localized in it. Moreover, when analyzing the dynamics of the vector field fluctuations, we see that their spectrum contains a single bound state corresponding to the 4D massless photon of the model, separated from a continuum of massive KK excitations by a mass gap.

On the other hand, this kind of de Sitter 3-branes embedded in a higher dimensional manifold are also interesting from the point of view of cosmology. Since the aforementioned field configuration describes a 3-brane with 4D de Sitter symmetry (i.e. an expanding \(dS_4\) brane) embedded in a positive definite and asymptotically Minkowski spacetime \(M_5\), it qualitatively describes some aspects of the inflationary period of our own universe [53, 54]. Moreover, since the second derivative of the scale factor with respect to time is positive, it can describe some aspects of the accelerated expansion of the universe, related to its present epoch. It is known that the cosmic inflation theory is in accordance with the temperature fluctuation properties observed in the cosmic microwave background radiation. This agreement and other observational successes, together with the fact that inflation likely occurs at very high temperatures and its study involves relevant assumptions regarding the physical phenomena that take place at such high energies, lead to several serious attempts to find inflationary configurations within the framework of string theory and supergravity [55, 56, 57].

Coming back to the tachyonic braneworld model, let us start by considering the following 5D action:
$$\begin{aligned} S&= \int d^5 x \sqrt{-g} \left( \frac{1}{2\kappa _5^2} R - \Lambda _5\right) \nonumber \\&- \int d^{5}x \sqrt{-g} V(T)\sqrt{1+g^{MN}\partial _{M} T\partial _{N} T}. \end{aligned}$$
(1)
This action describes gravity with a bulk cosmological constant \(\Lambda _5\) minimally coupled to the bulk tachyon field \(T\) [58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63], where \(\kappa _5\) is the 5D gravitational coupling constant, \(M,N=0,1,2,3,5\); and \(V(T)\) denotes the tachyon self-interaction potential.

The second therm in (1) was originally proposed in [58, 59] when studying a tachyon field living on the world volume of a non-BPS brane and has found interesting applications in braneworld cosmology [64] and in string cosmology [65, 66, 67]. In [68] it was realized that this action can, in fact, be used for any relativistic scalar field. Moreover, solar system constraints were analyzed in [69] by using this tachyonic action as a scalar tensor theory.

We shall consider a warped 5D metric with a spatially flat cosmological background induced on the 3-brane:
$$\begin{aligned} ds^2&= g_{MN}dx^{M}dx^{N} = e^{2f(w)} \left[ \hat{g}_{\mu \nu }(x)dx^\mu dx^\nu + dw^2 \right] \nonumber \\&= e^{2f(w)} \left[ - d t^2\! +\! a^2(t) \left( dx^2 \!+\! dy^2 + dz^{2}\right) + dw^2\right] ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(2)
where \(f(w)\) is the warp factor, \(a(t)\) is the scale factor of the 3-brane, \(\hat{g}_{\mu \nu }(x)\) denotes the 4D metric tensor (\(\mu ,\nu =0,1,2,3\)) and \(w\) is the fifth coordinate.
Here we shall not elaborate on how the solution of this system was obtained, we will simply present it and refer the reader to [40] for details. Thus, the solution for the metric ansatz, i.e. for the scale and warp factors, respectively reads
$$\begin{aligned} a(t)=e^{H\,t}, \quad f(w)=-\frac{1}{2}\ln \left[ \frac{\cosh \left[ \,H\,(2w+c)\right] }{s}\right] ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(3)
the tachyon scalar field has the form
$$\begin{aligned} T(w)&= \pm \sqrt{\frac{-3}{2\,\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5}}\ \hbox {arctanh}\left[ \frac{\sinh \left[ \frac{H\,\left( 2w+c\right) }{2}\right] }{\sqrt{\cosh \left[ \,H\,(2w+c)\right] }}\right] \nonumber \\&= \pm \sqrt{\frac{-3}{2\,\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5}} \ln \left[ \hbox {tanh}\left( \frac{H\,\left( 2w+c\right) }{2}\right. \right) \nonumber \\&\left. +\sqrt{1+\hbox {tanh}^2\left( \frac{H\,\left( 2w+c\right) }{2}\right) } \right] , \end{aligned}$$
(4)
while the tachyon potential is given by
$$\begin{aligned} V(T)&= - \Lambda _5\ \hbox {sech}\left( \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3}\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5}\ T\right) \nonumber \\&\times \sqrt{6\ \hbox {sech}^2\left( \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3}\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5}\ T\right) -1}\nonumber \\&= - \Lambda _5\ \sqrt{1+\hbox {sech}\left[ \,H\,(2w+c)\right] }\nonumber \\&\times \sqrt{1+\frac{3}{2}\ \hbox {sech}\left[ \,H\,(2w+c)\right] }, \end{aligned}$$
(5)
where \(H\), \(c\), and \(s>0\) are integration constants. It is worth mentioning that in the last two equations we have set
$$\begin{aligned} s=-\frac{6H^2}{\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5} \end{aligned}$$
(6)
with a negative bulk cosmological constant \(\Lambda _5<0\).

Thus, the full solution corresponds to a non-trivial 5D configuration that describes a thick braneworld supported by a real tachyonic scalar field in which the induced metric on the 3-brane is described by a de Sitter 4D cosmological background.

It is evident that the warp factor decays and asymptotically vanishes along the extra dimension, whereas the tachyon scalar possesses a kink or antikink-like profile. In contrast with previously found solutions for this system, see for instance [41], the self-interaction tachyon potential \(V(T)\) can be explicitly expressed in terms of the tachyonic scalar field \(T\) and has a maximum/minimum at the position of the brane, but it is positive/negative definite as can be seen from (5). Moreover, since the tachyon field is bounded, the self-interaction potential \(V(T)\) is bounded as well and remains always real.

The 5D curvature scalar for the solution (3) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} R=-\frac{14}{3}\kappa _5^2\,\Lambda _5\,\hbox {sech}\left[ \,H\,(2w+c)\right] \!. \end{aligned}$$
(7)
It is worth noticing that this invariant is positive definite and vanishes asymptotically, yielding an asymptotically 5D Minkowski spacetime. This is a very peculiar and novel property of the braneworld configuration under consideration since, usually, in the absence of matter a negative cosmological constant \(\Lambda _5\) leads to an asymptotically \(AdS_5\) spacetime. However, from (1) it is clear that both the cosmological constant \(\Lambda _5\) and the self-interaction potent\(V(T)\) contribute to the asymptotically vanishing overall effective cosmological constant of the 5D spacetime of the tachyonic braneworld.

2 Localization of gauge vector fields

Now we shall investigate the localization and mass spectrum of gauge fields on the tachyonic thick braneworld previously reviewed. Let us begin with the five-dimensional action of a gauge vector field
$$\begin{aligned} S_{1} = -\frac{1}{4}\int d^{5}x \sqrt{-g}~ g^{M N} g^{RS}F_{MR}F_{NS}, \end{aligned}$$
(8)
where \(F_{MN}=\partial _{M}A_{N}-\partial _{N}A_{M}\). The corresponding field equations that follow from this action are
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \partial _{M}\left( \sqrt{-g} g^{M N} g^{R S} F_{NS}\right) = 0. \end{aligned}$$
(9)
By recalling the background metric (2), the field equations can be expressed in terms of the hatted 4D metric \(\hat{g}^{\mu \nu }\) as follows:
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\hat{g}}}\partial _\nu \left( \sqrt{-\hat{g}} ~ \hat{g}^{\nu \rho }\hat{g}^{\mu \lambda }F_{\rho \lambda }\right) +{\hat{g}^{\mu \lambda }}e^{-f}\partial _w \left( e^{f} F_{5\lambda }\right) = 0, ~~\end{aligned}$$
(10)
$$\begin{aligned}&\partial _\mu \left( \sqrt{-\hat{g}}~ \hat{g}^{\mu \nu } F_{\nu 5}\right) = 0.~~ \end{aligned}$$
(11)
Let us choose the gauge condition \(A_5=0\) by using our freedom. Therefore, the action (8) adopts the form
$$\begin{aligned} S_1&= - \frac{1}{4} \int d^5 x \sqrt{-g} \nonumber \\&\times \bigg \{ g^{\mu \alpha } g^{\nu \beta } F_{\mu \nu }F_{\alpha \beta } +2e^{-2f} g^{\mu \nu } \partial _w A_{\mu } \partial _w A_{\nu } \bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$
(12)
By further making use of the following KK decomposition for the gauge field \(A_{\mu }\):
$$\begin{aligned} A_{\mu }(x^{\lambda },w)=\sum _n a^{(n)}_\mu (x^{\lambda })\rho _n(w)e^{-f/2} \end{aligned}$$
(13)
the action (12) is expressed as
$$\begin{aligned} S_1&= - \frac{1}{4} \sum _{m}\sum _{n}\int d^4 x\ dw \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\,\nonumber \\&\times \bigg [\hat{g}^{\mu \alpha } \hat{g}^{\nu \beta }f^{(m)}_{\mu \nu }f^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta }\;\rho _m\rho _n +2\,\hat{g}^{\mu \nu }a^{(m)}_{\mu }a^{(n)}_{\nu }\nonumber \\&\times \bigg (\rho '_m\rho '_n-\frac{1}{2}f'(\rho _m\rho _n)'+\frac{1}{4}f'^2\rho _m\rho _n \bigg )\bigg ], \end{aligned}$$
(14)
where \(f^{(n)}_{\mu \nu } = \partial _\mu a^{(n)}_\nu - \partial _\nu a^{(n)}_\mu \) is the 4D field strength tensor and \('\) denotes derivatives with respect to the fifth dimension. Here we shall make use of the following relations: \(\rho '_m\rho '_n=(\rho '_m\rho _n)'-\rho ''_m\rho _n\) and \(f'(\rho _m\rho _n)'=(f'\rho _m\rho _n)'-f''\rho _m\rho _n\) in order to get rid of total derivative terms along the fifth dimension and get the action
$$\begin{aligned} S_1&= - \frac{1}{4} \sum _{m}\sum _{n}\int d^4 x\ dw \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\,\nonumber \\&\times \bigg \{\hat{g}^{\mu \alpha } \hat{g}^{\nu \beta }f^{(m)}_{\mu \nu }f^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta }\;\rho _m\rho _n +2\,\hat{g}^{\mu \nu }a^{(m)}_{\mu }a^{(n)}_{\nu }\nonumber \\&\times \bigg [-\rho ''_m+\left( \frac{1}{2}f''+\frac{1}{4}f'^2\right) \rho _m\bigg ]\rho _n\bigg \}. \end{aligned}$$
(15)
By further applying the orthonormalization condition for the extra dimensional functions \(\rho _m(w)\)
$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits ^{\infty }_{-\infty } \;\rho _m(w)\rho _n(w)dw=\delta _{mn}, \end{aligned}$$
(16)
the action (15) transforms into
$$\begin{aligned} S_1&= \sum _{n}\int d^4 x \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\nonumber \\&\times \bigg ( - \frac{1}{4}\hat{g}^{\mu \alpha } \hat{g}^{\nu \beta } f^{(n)}_{\mu \nu }f^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta } - \frac{1}{2}m_{n}^2 ~\hat{g}^{\mu \nu } a^{(n)}_{\mu }a^{(n)}_{\nu } \bigg ), \end{aligned}$$
(17)
where, since the prefactor of \(\hat{g}^{\mu \nu }a^{(m)}_{\mu }a^{(n)}_{\nu }\) must define a squared mass for the gauge potential \(a^{(n)}_{\mu }\), we have assumed that the KK vector modes \(\rho _n(w)\) satisfy the following Schrödinger equation:
$$\begin{aligned} \left[ -\partial ^2_w +V_1(w) \right] {\rho }_n(w)=m_n^{2} {\rho }_n(w) \end{aligned}$$
(18)
with an analog quantum mechanical potential \(V_{1}(w)\) given by
$$\begin{aligned} V_{1}(w)\!=\! \frac{1}{2}\partial ^2_w f + \frac{1}{4}\left( \partial _w f\right) ^2 \!=\! \frac{H^{2}}{4}\left[ 1-5\, \text {sech}^{2}(2Hw)\right] ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(19)
where we have used the warp factor from (3) (with \(c=0\)) in the second equality.
Alternatively, by making use of the KK decomposition (13), the Schrödinger equation (18) can be obtained from the field equation (10) upon the corresponding definition of the 4D squared mass \(m_n^{2}\) for the vector field, in agreement with the previous approach. Thus, from (10) under the KK decomposition (13) we get
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\hat{g}}}\partial _\nu \bigg ( \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\,\hat{g}^{\mu \alpha } \hat{g}^{\nu \beta }\sum _{n}f^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta }\bigg )\rho _n\nonumber \\&\quad +\hat{g}^{\mu \lambda }\sum _{n}a^{(n)}_{\lambda }\bigg [\rho ''_n-\left( \frac{1}{2}f''+\frac{1}{4}f'^2\right) \rho _n\bigg ]=0. \end{aligned}$$
(20)
We note that the first term defines the 4D mass of a massive gauge vector field according to
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\sqrt{-\hat{g}}}\partial _\nu \bigg ( \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\,\hat{g}^{\mu \alpha } \hat{g}^{\nu \beta }f^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta }\bigg )=m_n^2\hat{g}^{\mu \lambda }a^{(n)}_{\lambda }, \end{aligned}$$
(21)
giving rise to the Schrödinger equation (18) for the extra dimensional profile \(\rho _n(w)\). It should be stated as well that the remaining field equation (11) leads to the Lorentz gauge condition for the 4D gauge vector field \(a^{(n)}_{\mu }\).
In order to study the localization of the gauge vector field we observe that the quantum mechanical potential (19) has a minimum equal to \(-H^{2}\) at \(w=0\) and asymptotically adopts a positive definite value \({H^{2}}/{4}\) at \(w=\pm \infty \), guaranteeing the existence of a mass gap in the corresponding spectrum. Thus, equation (18) with the quantum mechanical potential (19) is nothing else than the Schrödinger equation with a modified Pöschl–Teller potential,
$$\begin{aligned} \left[ -\partial _{u}^{2}-\frac{5}{16}\text {sech}^{2}u\right] \rho _{n}=E_{n}\rho _{n}, \end{aligned}$$
(22)
where we have set \(u=2Hw\) and \(E_{n}=\frac{m_{n}^{2}}{4H^{2}}-\frac{1}{16}\). The corresponding to (22) energy spectrum is found to be \(E_{n}=-\left( \frac{1}{4}-n\right) ^{2}\), where \(n\) is an integer satisfying \(0\le n <\frac{1}{4}\). Therefore, there is just one bound state in the energy spectrum of the KK vector profile, namely, the massless one \(\rho _{0}\) with energy \(E_{0}=-1/16\). Thus, the normalized zero mode corresponding to the ground state reads
$$\begin{aligned} \rho _{0}(w)=\frac{\sqrt{H}\left( \pi /2\right) ^{1/4}}{2\,\Gamma \left( 5/4\right) }\text {sech}^\frac{1}{4}(2Hw). \end{aligned}$$
(23)
The continuous spectrum of massive vector KK modes starts at \(m^{2}={H^{2}}/{4}\) and asymptotically turns into plane waves according to the traditional quantum mechanical picture. Since these modes are not localized on the brane, when the energy of vector modes is larger than \(H/2\), they leak into the extra dimension.
Let us see how this comes about. The general solution for the Schrödinger equation (18) can be expressed as a linear combination of associated Legendre functions of first and second kind of degree \(1/4\) and order \(\mu =i\,\sigma =\sqrt{\frac{1}{16}-\frac{m^2}{4H^2}}\):
$$\begin{aligned} \rho _n(w)\!=\!k_1\ P_{1/4}^{\mu } \left[ \tanh (2Hw)\right] +k_2\ Q_{1/4}^{\mu }\left[ \tanh (2Hw)\right] ,\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(24)
where \(k_1\) and \(k_2\) are integration constants. As pointed out above, the continuous spectrum of gauge eigenfunctions starts at \(2m>H\), when the order becomes imaginary, and asymptotically describe plane waves according to [70]:
$$\begin{aligned} \rho ^{\mu }_{\pm }(w)\!&= \!C_{\pm }(\sigma )P^{\pm i\sigma }_{1/4} \Bigl (\!\tanh \bigl (2Hw\bigr )\!\Bigr ) \sim \frac{C_{\pm }(\sigma )}{\Gamma (1\mp i\sigma )}e^{\pm i2H\sigma w}\nonumber \\&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi }}e^{\pm i2H\sigma w}. \end{aligned}$$
(25)

3 Conclusions and discussion

We have shown that gauge field localization in the de Sitter thick braneworld generated by gravity coupled to a tachyonic scalar field is feasible since the normalizable vector zero mode can be localized on the brane. The spectrum consists of a massless zero mode (the ground state) and a series of continuous massive KK gauge modes separated by a mass gap from the massless one, as also happens in the KK spectrum of the metric fluctuations [40]. The mass gap is proportional to \(H\), and hence, proportional to the square root of the 4D cosmological constant. Thus, the height of the mass gap, which determines the energy scale at which the KK fluctuations can be excited, somehow is defined by the 4D cosmological constant and is big/small if the Hubble parameter is big/small.

It would be interesting to consider the localization of fermion fields in the tachyonic braneworld model under consideration. This study could lead to the possibility of computing the corrections to Coulomb’s law due to the KK massive modes of the gauge vector field within the model. It is also interesting to perform the analysis of one-loop corrections to brane-to-brane propagators as in [71] in order to study possible divergent pathologies related to the existence of the mass gap of the model under consideration. These two issues are currently under consideration, and we do hope to overcome the difficulties we found and report on them in the near future.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge useful and illuminating discussions with Raúl Henríquez. AHA is grateful to A.S. Adamidou for her valuable support. AHA and ADR are grateful to MCTP, UNACH for hospitality, and thank SNI for support. ADR acknowledges a postdoctoral grant from CONACYT while the research of AHA was supported from grant “Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica”  (PAPIIT) UNAM, IN103413-3, Teorías de Kaluza–Klein, inflación y perturbaciones gravitacionales.

References

  1. 1.
    V.A. Rubakov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, Do we live inside a domain wall? Phys. Lett. B 125, 136 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V.A. Rubakov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, Extra space-time dimensions: towards a solution to the cosmological constant problem. Phys. Lett. B 125, 139 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.J. Squires, Dimensional reduction caused by a cosmological constant. Phys. Lett. B 167, 286 (1986)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Visser, An exotic class of Kaluza-Klein models. Phys. Lett. B 159, 22 (1985). arXiv:hep-th/9910093
  5. 5.
    S. Randjbar-Daemi, C. Wetterich, Kaluza-Klein solutions with noncompact internal spaces. Phys. Lett. B 166, 65 (1986)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Antoniadis, A possible new dimension at a few Tev. Phys. Lett. B 246, 377 (1990)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9803315
  8. 8.
    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV. Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9804398
  9. 9.
    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, N. Kaloper, R. Sundrum, A small cosmological constant from a large extra dimension. Phys. Lett. B 480, 193 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0001197
  10. 10.
    S. Kachru, M. Schulz, E. Silverstein, Self-tuning flat domain walls in 5D gravity and string theory. Phys. Rev. D 62, 045021 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0001206
  11. 11.
    M. Gogberashvili, Hierarchy problem in the shell universe model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 1635 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/9812296
  12. 12.
    M. Gogberashvili, Four dimensionality in noncompact Kaluza-Klein model. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 2025 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9904383
  13. 13.
    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999). arxiv:hep-ph/9905221
  14. 14.
    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9906064 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser, A. Karch, Modeling the fifth dimension with scalars and gravity. Phys. Rev. D 62, 046008 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9909134
  16. 16.
    A. Kehagias and K. Tamvakis, Localized Gravitons, Gauge Bosons and Chiral Fermions in Smooth Spaces Generated by a Bounce, Phys. Lett. B 504(2001) 38, arXiv:hep-th/0010112
  17. 17.
    C. Csaki, J. Erlich, T. Hollowood, Y. Shirman, Universal Aspects of gravity localized on thick branes. Nucl. Phys. B 581, 309 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0001033
  18. 18.
    M.K. Parikh, S.N. Solodukhin, De Sitter brane gravity: From close-up to panorama. Phys. Lett. B 503, 384 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0012231
  19. 19.
    A. Wang, Thick de Sitter 3-Branes, Dynamic Black Holes and Localization of Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 66, 024024 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0201051
  20. 20.
    I.H. Brevik, K. Ghoroku, S.D. Odintsov, M. Yahiro, Localization of gravity on brane embedded in AdS(5) and dS(5). Phys. Rev. D 66, 064016 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204066
  21. 21.
    D. Bazeia, A.R. Gomes, Bloch Brane. JHEP 0405, 012 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0403141
  22. 22.
    V.I. Afonso, D. Bazeia, R. Menezes, AYu. Petrov, f(R)-Brane. Phys. Lett. B 658, 71 (2007). arXiv:0710.3790 [hep-th]
  23. 23.
    A. Balcerzak and M.P. Da̧browski, Brane f(R) gravity cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 123527, arXiv:1004.0150 [hep-th]
  24. 24.
    A. Herrera-Aguilar, D. Malagón-Morejón, R.R. Mora-Luna, Localization of gravity on a thick braneworld without scalar fields. JHEP 1011, 015 (2010). arXiv:1009.1684 [hep-th]
  25. 25.
    Y. Zhong, Y.-X. Liu, K. Yang, Tensor perturbations of f(R)-branes. Phys. Lett. B 699, 398 (2011). arXiv:1010.3478 [hep-th]
  26. 26.
    M. Gogberashvili, D. Singleton, Anti-de-Sitter Island-Universes from 5D Standing Waves. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 2131 (2010). arXiv:0904.2828 [hep-th]
  27. 27.
    M. Gogberashvili, A. Herrera-Aguilar, D. Malagón-Morejón, An Anisotropic Standing Wave Braneworld and Associated Sturm-Liouville Problem. Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 025007 (2012). arXiv:1012.4534 [hep-th]
  28. 28.
    O. Arias, R. Cardenas, I. Quiros, Thick brane worlds arising from pure geometry. Nucl. Phys. B 643, 187 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0202130
  29. 29.
    N. Barbosa-Cendejas, A. Herrera-Aguilar, Localization of 4D gravity on pure geometrical thick branes. Phys. Rev. D 73, 084022 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Barbosa-Cendejas, A. Herrera-Aguilar, Erratum-ibid. D 77, 049901 (2008). arXiv:hep-th/0603184
  31. 31.
    J.M. Hoff da Silva, R. da Rocha, Braneworld remarks in Riemann-Cartan manifolds. Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 055007 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    J.M. Hoff da Silva and R. da Rocha, Corrigendum-ibid. 26 (2009) 179801, arXiv:0804.4261 [gr-qc]
  33. 33.
    J.M. Hoff da Silva, R. da Rocha, Effective Monopoles within Thick Branes. Europhys. Lett. 100, 11001 (2012). arXiv:1209.0989 [hep-th]
  34. 34.
    J.M. Hoff da Silva, R. da Rocha, Black string corrections in variable tension braneworld scenarios. Phys. Rev. D 85, 046009 (2012). arXiv:1202.1256 [gr-qc]
  35. 35.
    D. Bazeia, F.A. Brito, J.R. Nascimento, Supergravity brane worlds and tachyon potentials. Phys. Rev. D 68, 085007 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0306284
  36. 36.
    R. Koley, S. Kar, A Novel braneworld model with a bulk scalar field. Phys. Lett. B 623, 244 (2005)ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. Koley, S. Kar, Erratum-ibid. B 631, 199 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0507277
  38. 38.
    D. Maity, S. SenGupta, S. Sur, Stability analysis of the Randall-Sundrum braneworld in presence of bulk scalar. Phys. Lett. B 643, 348 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0604195
  39. 39.
    A. Das, S. Kar, S. SenGupta, Stable two-brane models with bulk tachyon matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 4457 (2009). arXiv:0804.1757 [hep-th]
  40. 40.
    G. Germán, A. Herrera-Aguilar, D. Malagón-Morejón, R.R. Mora-Luna, R. da Rocha, A de Sitter tachyon thick braneworld. JCAP 1302, 035 (2013). arXiv:1210.0721 [hep-th]
  41. 41.
    S. Pal, S. Kar, de Sitter branes with a bulk scalar. Gen. Rel. Grav. 41, 1165 (2009). arXiv:hep-th/0701266
  42. 42.
    M. Carrillo-González, G. Germán, A. Herrera-Aguilar, D. Malagón-Morejón, On gravity localization in scalar braneworlds with a super-exponential warp factor. Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1657 (2014). arXiv:1210.0597 [hep-th]Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    G.R. Dvali, M.A. Shifman, Domain walls in strongly coupled theories. Phys. Lett. B 396, 64 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9612128
  44. 44.
    B. Bajc, G. Gabadadze, Localization of matter and cosmological constant on a brane in anti de Sitter space. Phys. Lett. B 474, 282 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9912232
  45. 45.
    A. Pomarol, Gauge bosons in a five-dimensional theory with localized gravity. Phys. Lett. B 486, 153 (2000). arXiv: hep-ph/9911294
  46. 46.
    I. Oda, Bosonic fields in the string-like defect model. Phys. Rev. D 62, 126009 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0008012
  47. 47.
    Y.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhang, L.-D. Zhang, Y.-S. Duan, Localization of Matters on Pure Geometrical Thick Branes. JHEP 0802, 067 (2008). arXiv:0708.0065 [hep-th]
  48. 48.
    Y.-X. Liu, L.-D. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, Y.-S. Duan, Localization and Mass Spectrum of Matters on Weyl Thick Branes. JHEP 0808, 041 (2008). arXiv:0803.0098 [hep-th]
  49. 49.
    H. Guo, A. Herrera-Aguilar, Y.-X. Liu, D. Malagón-Morejón, R.R. Mora-Luna, Localization of bulk matter fields on a pure de Sitter thick braneworld. Phys. Rev. D 87, 095011 (2013). arXiv:1103.2430 [hep-th]
  50. 50.
    M. Gogberashvili, P. Midodashvili, Localization of gauge bosons in the 5D standing wave braneworld. Phys. Lett. B 707, 169 (2012). arXiv:1105.1866 [hep-th]
  51. 51.
    M. Gogberashvili, P. Midodashvili, Gauge Fields in the 5D Gravity-Scalar Standing Wave Braneworld. Europhys. Lett. 104, 50002 (2013). arXiv:1312.6241 [hep-th]
  52. 52.
    I. Oda, Localization of matters on a string-like defect. Phys. Lett. B 496, 113 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0006203
  53. 53.
    A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems. Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems. Phys. Lett. B 108, 389 (1982)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    I.Y. Park, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh, AdS brane world Kaluza-Klein reduction. Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 6237 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0110238
  56. 56.
    C.P. Burgess, Lectures on Cosmic Inflation and its Potential Stringy Realizations. Class. Quant. Grav. 24, S795 (2007). arXiv:0708.2865 [hep-th]
  57. 57.
    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, String Cosmology: A Review. Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, 565 (2008). arXiv:0710.2951 [hep-th]
  58. 58.
    A. Sen, Supersymmetric world volume action for nonBPS D-branes. JHEP 9910, 008 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9909062
  59. 59.
    E.A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, T.C. de Wit, E. Eyras, S. Panda, T duality and actions for non-BPS D-branes. JHEP 0005, 009 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0003221
  60. 60.
    A. Sen, Rolling tachyon. JHEP 0204, 048 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0203211
  61. 61.
    A. Sen, Tachyon matter. JHEP 0207, 065 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0203265
  62. 62.
    A. Sen, Field theory of tachyon matter. Mod. Phys. Letts. A 17, 1797 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204143
  63. 63.
    A. Sen, Time and tachyon. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 4869 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0209122
  64. 64.
    A. Mazumdar, S. Panda, A. Perez-Lorenzana, Assisted inflation via tachyon condensation. Nucl. Phys. B 614, 101 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0107058
  65. 65.
    G.W. Gibbons, Cosmological evolution of the rolling tachyon. Phys. Lett. B 537, 1 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204008
  66. 66.
    D. Choudhury, D. Ghoshal, D.P. Jatkar, S. Panda, On the cosmological relevance of the tachyon. Phys. Lett. B 544, 231 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204204
  67. 67.
    D. Choudhury, D. Ghoshal, D.P. Jatkar, S. Panda, Hybrid inflation and brane - anti-brane system. JCAP 0307, 009 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0305104
  68. 68.
    T. Padmanabhan, Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter. Phys. Rev. D 66, 021301 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0204150
  69. 69.
    N. Chandrachani Devi, S. Panda, A. A. Sen, Solar System Constraints on Scalar Tensor Theories with Non-Standard Action, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 063521, arXiv:1104.0152
  70. 70.
    N. Barbosa-Cendejas, A. Herrera-Aguilar, M.A. Reyes Santos and C. Schubert, Mass gap for gravity localized on Weyl thick branes. Phys. Rev. D 77, 126013 (2008). arXiv:0709.3552 [hep-th]
  71. 71.
    D.V. Kirpichnikov, Infrared properties of one-loop corrections to brane-to-brane propagators in models with localized vector bosons. Phys. Rev. D 88, 125018 (2013). arXiv:1310.2866

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Funded by SCOAP3 / License Version CC BY 4.0.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfredo Herrera-Aguilar
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alma D. Rojas
    • 1
    • 4
  • Elí Santos
    • 1
  1. 1.Mesoamerican Centre for Theoretical PhysicsUniversidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Ciudad UniversitariaChiapasMéxico
  2. 2.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana IztapalapaMéxico, D.F.México
  3. 3.Instituto de Física y MatemáticasUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMéxico
  4. 4.AHEP Group, Instituto de Física Corpuscular C.S.I.C./Universitat de ValènciaPaterna (Valéncia)Spain

Personalised recommendations