Advertisement

The European Physical Journal C

, Volume 65, Issue 3–4, pp 491–500 | Cite as

B s μ+μ decay in the R-parity violating minimal supergravity

  • Ashutosh Kumar Alok
  • Sudhir Kumar Gupta
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We study B s μ + μ in the context of the R-parity violating minimal supergravity in the high-tan β regime. We find that the lowest value of the branching ratio can go well below the present LHCb sensitivity and hence B s μ + μ can even be invisible to the LHC. We also find that the present upper bound on Br (B s μ + μ ) puts strong constraint on the minimal supergravity parameter space. The constraints become more severe if the upper bound is close to its standard model prediction.

Keywords

Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model Higgs Doublet Standard Model Prediction BABAR Collaboration Minimal Supergravity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of the BX s + branching fraction with a sum over exclusive modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 081802 (2004). arXiv:hep-ex/0404006 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Iwasaki et al. (Belle Collaboration), Improved measurement of the electroweak penguin process BX s + . Phys. Rev. D 72, 092005 (2005). arXiv:hep-ex/0503044 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for the rare decay BK * + and measurement of the BK + branching fraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 221802 (2003). arXiv:hep-ex/0308042 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurements of branching fractions, rate asymmetries, and angular distributions in the rare decays BK + and BK * + . Phys. Rev. D 73, 092001 (2006). arXiv:hep-ex/0604007 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Ishikawa et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of the electroweak penguin decay BK * + . Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 261601 (2003). arXiv:hep-ex/0308044 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron and c-hadron properties at the end of 2007. arXiv:0808.1297 [hep-ex]
  7. 7.
    A. Ali, E. Lunghi, C. Greub, G. Hiller, Improved model-independent analysis of semileptonic and radiative rare B decays. Phys. Rev. D 66, 034002 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0112300 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Lunghi, Improved model-independent analysis of semileptonic and radiative rare B decays. arXiv:hep-ph/0210379
  9. 9.
    F. Kruger, E. Lunghi, Looking for novel CP violating effects in \(\bar{B}\to K^{*}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}\) . Phys. Rev. D 63, 014013 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0008210 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Ghinculov, T. Hurth, G. Isidori, Y.P. Yao, New NNLL QCD results on the decay BX s l + l . Eur. Phys. J. C 33, S288 (2004). arXiv:hep-ph/0310187 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.H. Asatryan, H.M. Asatrian, C. Greub, M. Walker, Calculation of two loop virtual corrections to bsl + l in the standard model. Phys. Rev. D 65, 074004 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0109140 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.H. Asatrian, H.M. Asatrian, C. Greub, M. Walker, Two-loop virtual corrections to BX s l + l in the standard model. Phys. Lett. B 507, 162 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0103087 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, C. Tarantino, Minimal flavor violation waiting for precise measurements of ΔM s, S ψφ, A SLs, |V ub|, γ and B s,d0μ + μ . J. High Energy Phys. 0610, 003 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0604057 ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras, QCD corrections to rare K and B decays for arbitrary top quark mass. Nucl. Phys. B 400, 225 (1993) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.J. Buras, Relations between ΔM s,d and \(B_{s,d}\to\mu\bar {\mu}\) in models with minimal flavor violation. Phys. Lett. B 566, 115 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0303060 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Search for B sμ + μ and B dμ + μ decays with 2 fb−1 of ppbar collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 101802 (2008). arXiv:0712.1708 [hep-ex] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Lenzi, Rare B decays at LHCb. arXiv:0710.5056 [hep-ex]
  18. 18.
    M. Smizanska (ATLAS and C. Collaborations), Prospects for observing CP violation and rare decays at ATLAS and CMS. arXiv:0810.3618 [hep-ex]
  19. 19.
    A.K. Alok, S.U. Sankar, New physics upper bound on the branching ratio of \(\bar{B}_{s}\to l^{+}l^{-}\) . Phys. Lett. B 620, 61 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0502120 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Skiba, J. Kalinowski, B(s) →τ + τ decay in a two Higgs doublet model. Nucl. Phys. B 404, 3 (1993) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Grossman, Phenomenology of models with more than two Higgs doublets. Nucl. Phys. B 426, 355 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9401311 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, E. Nardi, Bτ + τ (X) decays: First constraints and phenomenological implications. Phys. Rev. D 55, 2768 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9607473 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y.B. Dai, C.S. Huang, H.W. Huang, BX s τ + τ in a two-Higgs doublet model. Phys. Lett. B 390, 257 (1997) (Erratum-ibid. B 513, 429 (2001)). arXiv:hep-ph/9607389 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Guetta, E. Nardi, Searching for new physics in rare Bτ decays. Phys. Rev. D 58, 012001 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9707371 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    X.G. He, T.D. Nguyen, R.R. Volkas, B meson rare decays in two Higgs doublet models. Phys. Rev. D 38, 814 (1988) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.L. Hewett, S. Nandi, T.G. Rizzo, Bμ + μ in the two Higgs doublet model. Phys. Rev. D 39, 250 (1989) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C.S. Huang, W. Liao, Q.S. Yan, The promising process to distinguish supersymmetric models with large tan(beta) from the standard model: BX s μ + μ . Phys. Rev. D 59, 011701 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9803460 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.R. Choudhury, N. Gaur, Dileptonic decay of B s meson in SUSY models with large tan(beta). Phys. Lett. B 451, 86 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9810307 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    K.S. Babu, C.F. Kolda, Higgs-mediated B 0μ + μ in minimal supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 228 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9909476 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H.E. Logan, U. Nierste, B s,dl + l in a two-Higgs-doublet model. Nucl. Phys. B 586, 39 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/0004139 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    C.S. Huang, W. Liao, Q.S. Yan, S.H. Zhu, B sl + l in a general 2HDM and MSSM. Phys. Rev. D 63, 114021 (2001) (Erratum-ibid. D 64, 059902 (2001)). arXiv:hep-ph/0006250 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    P.H. Chankowski, L. Slawianowska, B s,dμ + μ decay in the MSSM. Phys. Rev. D 63, 054012 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0008046 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Bobeth, T. Ewerth, F. Kruger, J. Urban, Analysis of neutral Higgs-boson contributions to the decays \(\bar{B_{s}}\to l^{+}l^{-}\) and \(\bar{B}\to Kl^{+}l^{-}\) . Phys. Rev. D 64, 074014 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0104284 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Dedes, H.K. Dreiner, U. Nierste, Correlation of B sμ + μ and (g−2)μ in minimal supergravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 251804 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0108037 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.J. Buras, P.H. Chankowski, J. Rosiek, L. Slawianowska, ΔM (d,s),B s,dμ + μ and BX s γ in supersymmetry at large tan β. Nucl. Phys. B 659, 3 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0210145 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. Hiller, F. Kruger, More model independent analysis of bs processes. Phys. Rev. D 69, 074020 (2004). arXiv:hep-ph/0310219 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C.H. Chen, C.Q. Geng, Dilepton decays and oscillation of B s in split supersymmetry with R-parity violation. Phys. Rev. D 72, 037701 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0501001 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Y.G. Xu, R.M. Wang, Y.D. Yang, Probe R-parity violating supersymmetry effects in BK * l + l and B sμ + μ decays. Phys. Rev. D 74, 114019 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0610338 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.J. Wang, R.M. Wang, Y.G. Xu, Y.D. Yang, The rare decays B u+π + + , ρ + + and B d0 + in the R-parity violating supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 77, 014017 (2008). arXiv:0711.0321 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J.R. Ellis, S. Heinemeyer, K.A. Olive, G. Weiglein, Light heavy MSSM Higgs bosons at large tan β. Phys. Lett. B 653, 292 (2007). arXiv:0706.0977 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Dedes, J. Rosiek, P. Tanedo, Complete one-loop MSSM predictions for Bll′ at the Tevatron and LHC. arXiv:0812.4320 [hep-ph]
  42. 42.
    B.C. Allanach, G. Hiller, D.R.T. Jones, P. Slavich, Flavour violation in anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking. arXiv:0902.4880 [hep-ph]
  43. 43.
    T. Inami, C.S. Lim, Effects of superheavy quarks and leptons in low-energy weak processes \(K_{L}\to\mu\bar{\mu}\) , \(K^{+}\to\pi^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}\) and \(K^{0}\leftrightarrow\bar{K^{0}}\) . Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 297 (1981) (Erratum-ibid. 65, 1772 (1981)) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    A.K. Alok, A. Dighe, S.U. Sankar, Probing extended Higgs sector through rare bs μ + μ transitions. Phys. Rev. D 78, 034020 (2008). arXiv:0805.0354 [hep-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    V.D. Barger, G.F. Giudice, T. Han, Some new aspects of supersymmetry R-parity violating interactions. Phys. Rev. D 40, 2987 (1989). See also H. Dreiner in Perspective in Supersymmetry, ed. by G. Kane (World Scientific) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. Mir, F. Tahir, K. Ahmed, Lepton polarization asymmetry in B sl + l decays in R-parity-violating minimal supersymmetric standard model. Europhys. Lett. 83, 41002 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    H.K. Dreiner, M. Kramer, B. O’Leary, Bounds on R-parity violation from leptonic and semi-leptonic meson decays. Phys. Rev. D 75, 114016 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0612278 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    P.B. Mackenzie, CKM physics from lattice QCD, in Proceedings of 4th Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference (FPCP 2006), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 9–12 April 2006, p. 022. arXiv:hep-ph/0606034
  49. 49.
    C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. Djouadi, J.L. Kneur, G. Moultaka, SuSpect: A Fortran code for the supersymmetric and Higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM. Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 426 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0211331 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. Barbieri, L. Maiani, Renormalization of the electroweak rho parameter from supersymmetric particles. Nucl. Phys. B 224, 32 (1983) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    C.S. Lim, T. Inami, N. Sakai, The rho parameter in supersymmetric models. Phys. Rev. D 29, 1488 (1984) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    E. Eliasson, Radiative corrections to electroweak interactions in supergravity guts. Phys. Lett. B 147, 65 (1984) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    M. Drees, K. Hagiwara, Supersymmetric contribution to the electroweak ρ parameter. Phys. Rev. D 42, 1709 (1990) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    A. Djouadi, P. Gambino, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, C. Junger, G. Weiglein, Supersymmetric contributions to electroweak precision observables: QCD corrections. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3626 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9612363 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    A. Djouadi, P. Gambino, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, C. Junger, G. Weiglein, Leading QCD corrections to scalar quark contributions to electroweak precision observables. Phys. Rev. D 57, 4179 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9710438 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. Davier, S. Eidelman, A. Hocker, Z. Zhang, Updated estimate of the muon magnetic moment using revised results from e + e annihilation. Eur. Phys. J. C 31, 503 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0308213 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    K. Hagiwara, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura, T. Teubner, Predictions for g−2 of the muon and α QED(M Z2). Phys. Rev. D 69, 093003 (2004). arXiv:hep-ph/0312250 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    J.F. de Troconiz, F.J. Yndurain, The hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. Phys. Rev. D 71, 073008 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0402285 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    M. Passera, The standard model prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic moment. J. Phys. G 31, R75 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0411168 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    A.L. Kagan, M. Neubert, QCD anatomy of BX s γ decays. Eur. Phys. J. C 7, 5 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9805303 ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    P. Gambino, U. Haisch, Complete electroweak matching for radiative B decays. J. High Energy Phys. 0110, 020 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0109058 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    P. Gambino, U. Haisch, Electroweak effects in radiative B decays. J. High Energy Phys. 0009, 001 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/0007259 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch, Anomalous dimension matrix for radiative and rare semileptonic B decays up to three loops. Nucl. Phys. B 673, 238 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0306079 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    R. Barate et al. (LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches and ALEPH Collaboration), Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP. Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003). arXiv:hep-ex/0306033 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    G. Bhattacharyya, R-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings: A mini-review. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. A 52, 83 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9608415 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    H.K. Dreiner, An introduction to explicit R-parity violation. arXiv:hep-ph/9707435
  68. 68.
    B.C. Allanach, A. Dedes, H.K. Dreiner, Bounds on R-parity violating couplings at the weak scale and at the GUT scale. Phys. Rev. D 60, 075014 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9906209 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag / Società Italiana di Fisica 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Physics & AstronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations