Advertisement

The European Physical Journal C

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 83–101 | Cite as

Nonperturbative and perturbative aspects of photo- and electroproduction of vector mesons

  • H.G. Dosch
  • E. Ferreira
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We discuss various aspects of vector meson production, first analysing the interplay between perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of the QCD calculation. Using a general method adapted to incorporate both perturbative and nonperturbative aspects, we show that nonperturbative effects are important for all experimentally available values of the photon virtuality Q2. We compare the huge amount of experimental information now available with our theoretical results obtained using a specific nonperturbative model without free parameters, showing that quite simple features are able to explain the data.

Keywords

Wave Function Vector Meson Photon Virtuality Zeus Collaboration Nonperturbative Correction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Donnachie, P. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 311, 403 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.G. Ryskin, Z. Phys. C 57, 89 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.J. Brodsky, L. Frankfurt, J.F. Gunion, A.H. Mueller, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3134 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.G. Ryskin, R.G. Roberts, A.D. Martin, E.M. Levin, Z. Phys. C 76, 231 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Gotsman, E. Ferreira, E. Levin, U. Maor, E. Naftali, Phys. Lett. B 503, 277 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Gotsman, E. Levin, U. Maor, E. Naftali, Phys. Lett. B 532, 37 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Frankfurt, W. Koepf, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3194 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Frankfurt, W. Koepf, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 57, 512 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin, T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014022 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Gotsman, E. Levin, M. Lublinsky, U. Maor, E. Naftali, Acta Phys. Pol. B 34, 3255 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Nachtmann, Ann. Phys. 209, 436 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Ewerz, O. Nachtmann, hep-ph/0404254 and hep-ph/0511051Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.G. Dosch, Phys. Lett. B 190, 177 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.G. Dosch, Y.A. Simonov, Phys. Lett. B 205, 339 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Donnachie, P.V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 437, 408 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H.G. Dosch, E. Ferreira, Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 45 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.G. Dosch, E. Ferreira, Phys. Lett. B 576, 83 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Ferreira, V.L. Baltar, Nucl. Phys. A 748, 608 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0409021]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.G. Dosch, A. Kramer , Phys. Lett. B 252, 669 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.G. Dosch, E. Ferreira, A. Kramer, Phys. Rev. D 50, 1992 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9405237]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H.G. Dosch, T. Gousset, G. Kulzinger, H.J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2602 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B.Z. Kopeliovich, J. Nemchik, N.N. Nikolaev, B.G. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 324, 469 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B.Z. Kopeliovich, Phys. Lett. B 309, 179 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Blaettel, G. Baym, L.L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 896 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H.G. Dosch, T. Gousset, H.J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1666 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Kulzinger, H.G. Dosch, H.J. Pirner, Eur. Phys. J. C 7, 73 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Bauer, B. Stech, M. Wirbel, Z. Phys. C 34, 103 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Bauer, Z. Phys. C 29, 637 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    G.P. Lepage, S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.J. Brodsky, H.C. Pauli, S.S. Pinsky, Phys. Rep. 301, 299 (1998)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Dosch, S. Donnachie, P. Landshoff, O. Nachtmann, Pomeron Physics and QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Di Giacomo, H.G. Dosch, V.I. Shevchenko, Y.A. Simonov, Phys. Rep. 372, 319 (2002)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, E. Meggiolaro, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 73, 515 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Donnachie, H.G. Dosch, M. Rueter, Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 141 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Donnachie, H.G. Dosch, Phys. Lett. B 502, 74 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0010227]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Donnachie, H.G. Dosch, Phys. Rev. D 65, 014019 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0106169]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Donnachie, J. Gravelis, G. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114013 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 345 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Nucl. Phys. B 695, 3 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    H1 Collaboration, A. Aktas et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 585 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 603 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 373 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    E-401 Collaboration, M. Binkley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 73 (1982)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    E-516 Collaboration, B.H. Denby et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 795 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zeus Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 437, 432 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Phys. Lett. B 483, 23 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    R.M. Egloff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 657 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chio Collaboration, W.D. Shambroom et al., Phys. Rev. D 26, 1 (1982)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    EMC Collaboration, J.J. Aubert et al., Phys. Lett. B 161, 203 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    J. Ashman et al., Z. Phys. C 39, 169 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    E-665 experiment, M.R. Adams et al., Z. Phys. C 74, 237 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    NMC Collaboration, M. Arneodo et al., Nucl. Phys. B 429, 503 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    P. Amaudruz et al., Z. Phys. C 54, 239 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    ZEUS Collaboration, Preliminary, Budapest Conference 2001Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 371 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    H1 Collaboration, Preliminary, Aachen Conference 2003Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    H1 Collaboration, S. Aid et al., Nucl. Phys. B 468, 3 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zeus Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 247 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zeus Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 213 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    H1prelim-06-011, presented in DIS-2006, Tsukuba, Japan, April 2006Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zeus Collaboration, M. Derrick et al., Z. Phys. C 73, 73 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zeus Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 487, 273 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    FNAL-401, J. Busenitz et al., Phys. Rev. D 40, 1 (1989)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al., Z. Phys. C 73, 73 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zeus Collaboration, M. Derrick et al., Phys. Lett. B 377, 259 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al., Phys. Lett. B 483, 360 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Nucl. Phys. B 718, 3 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    K. Golec-Biernat, M. Wusthoff, Phys. Rev. D 60, 11402 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9903358]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    K. Golec-Biernat, M. Wusthoff, Phys. Rev. D 59, 01401 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9807513]Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    J. Bartels, K. Golec-Biernat, H. Kowalski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 01400 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0203258]Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    E. Iancu, K. Itakura, S. Munier, Phys. Lett. B 590, 19 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0310338]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    H. Kowalski, D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 68, 11400 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0304189]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, G. Watt, Phys. Rev. D 74, 07401 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0606272]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    C. Ewerz, O. Nachtmann, arXiv:hep-ph/0604087Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    C. Ewerz, O. Nachtmann, arXiv:hep-ph/0611076Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    E. Martynov, E. Predazzi, A. Prokudin, Phys. Rev. D 67, 07402 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0207272]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    R. Fiore, L.L. Jenkovszky, F. Paccanoni, A. Prokudin, Phys. Rev. D 68, 01400 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0302195]Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    J.R. Forshaw, R. Sandapen, G. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 69, 09401 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0312172]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    J.R. Forshaw, R. Sandapen, G. Shaw, JHEP 0611, 02 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0608161]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Instituto de FísicaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations