Modeling the world-wide airport network
Recently, we have presented the first exhaustive analysis of the world-wide airport network. Two important results of that study are that: (i) the world-wide airport network is a small-world network with power-law decaying degree and betweenness centrality distributions; (ii) the most connected cities (largest degree) are typically not the most central cities (largest betweenness centrality). This second finding is particularly significant because of results demonstrating that nodes with high betweenness tend to play a more important role in keeping networks connected than those with high degree. Here, we investigate if current network models can explain this finding and we show that they cannot. Thus, we propose a new model that explains this behavior in terms of the geo-political constraints that affect the growth of the airport network. We further hypothesize that in other infrastructures, affected by similar geo-political constraints, critical locations might not coincide with highly-connected hubs.
KeywordsNetwork Model Central City Large Degree Centrality Distribution Betweenness Centrality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Cost of the air transportation delay in Europe, Tech. rep.\/, EUROCONTROL - European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (2000); [http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports/prr2/ index.html]Google Scholar
- 6.ACI Annual Worldwide Airports Traffic Reports, Tech. rep.\/, Airport Council International, Geneva (1999). [http://www.airports.org]Google Scholar
- 9.R. Guimerá, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi, L.A.N. Amaral, arxiv/cond-mat 0312535 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.OAG MAX Database, OAG, London (2000)Google Scholar
- 18.M. Barthelémy, submitted arxiv/cond-mat 0309436 (2003)Google Scholar