Analysis of reaction cross sections of Ne and Mg isotopes at 240 MeV/u in the Dirac-Brueckner approach and Glauber model

Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract.

Within a relativistic effective complex nucleon-nucleon interaction derived by solving the Dirac-Brueckner-Bethe-Goldstone equation, locally, starting from the one-boson-exchange potential (OBEP) as a bare NN interaction, the optical potentials and reaction cross sections of the 20-36Ne , 24-38Mg + 12C reactions, recently observed at 240MeV/u , are calculated. The proton and neutron density distributions of target and projectile are derived from Skyrme-Hartree-Fock calculations, employing SKRA and SKM* interactions. A comparison between the experimental data as well as recent theoretical calculations of Horiuchi et al. (Phys. Rev. C 86, 024614 (2012)) and Panda et al. (Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450013 (2014)) show that the data are well reproduced by the present relativistic calculations.

Keywords

Nuclear Matter Optical Potential Reaction Cross Section Symmetry Energy Halo Nucleus 

References

  1. 1.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Lett. B 160, 380 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ozawa et al., Nucl. Phys. A 691, (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Ozawa, T. Suzukia, I. Tanihata, Nucl. Phys. A 693, 32 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Mittig et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1889 (1987)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.E. Warner et al., Phys. Rev. C 52, R1166 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.Q. Fang et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 064311 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Kanungo et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 021302(R) (2011)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Takechi et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 1878 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Nakamura et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 262501 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Horiuchi, Y. Suzuki, P. Capel, D. Baye, Phys. Rev. C 81, 024606 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Minomo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 052503 (2012)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Horiuchi, T. Inakura, T. Nakatsukasa, Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024614 (2012)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.N. Panda, Mahesh K. Sharma, S.K. Patra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450013 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Alonso, F. Sammarruca, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054301 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. van Dalen, C. Fuchs, A. Faessler, Nucl. Phys. A 744, 227 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. van Dalen, C. Fuchs, A. Faessler, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 29 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. van Dalen, H. Muether, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014319 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. van Dalen, H. Muether, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 19, 2077 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. van Giai, B.V. Carlson, Z. Ma, H.H. Wolter, J. Phys. G 37, 064043 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Muether, R. Machleidt, R. Brockmann, Phys. Rev. C 42, 1981 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Goegelein, E. van Dalen, C. Fuchs, H. Muether, Phys. Rev C 77, 025802 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Muether, A. Polls, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, 243 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Brockman, R. Machleidt, Phys. Lett. B 149, 283 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Machleidt, R. Brockman, Phys. Lett. 160, 364 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Ohtsuka, M. El Shabshiry, R. Linden, H. Muether, A. Faessler, Nucl. Phys. A 490, (1988)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Rashdan, Phys. Scr. 68, 166 (2003)CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Rashdan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 1287 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Bartel et al., Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79 (1982)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    I. Dutt, N. Dhiman, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27, 112401 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cai Xiangzhow et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 572 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Karakoc, C. Bertulani, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 420, 012074 (2013) 11th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (NN2012)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    B. Chen, F. Sammarruca, C.A. Bertulani, Phys. Rev. C 87, 054616 (2013)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G.Q. Li, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1702 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G.Q. Li, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 49, 566 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    I. Angeli, K.P. Marinovab, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 69 (2013)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Takechi et al., Nucl. Phys. A 834, 412c (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Takechi et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 1878 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Takechi et al., EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 02101 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Islamic University, Faculty of SciencePhysics DepartmentMadinahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations