Advertisement

Elastic and inelastic scattering of 14C + 11B versus 12,13C + 11B

  • S. Yu. Mezhevych
  • A. T. Rudchik
  • K. Rusek
  • K. W. Kemper
  • S. Kliczewski
  • E. I. Koshchy
  • A. A. Rudchik
  • S. B. Sakuta
  • J. Choiński
  • B. Czech
  • R. Siudak
  • A. Szczurek
Regular Article - Experimental Physics

Abstract

Complete angular distributions of the 14C + 11B elastic and inelastic scattering at the energy \( E_{lab}({}^{11}B)\) = 45 MeV were measured for the ground and excited states of 11B. The data were analyzed within the optical model and the coupled-reaction-channels method. The parameters of the 14C + 11B optical potential and 11B deformation were deduced. The contributions of one- and two-step transfers of nucleons and clusters into the 14C + 11B elastic and inelastic scattering were calculated. The isotopic differences between the 14C + 11B and 12,13C + 11B scatterings are presented and clearly show the importance of the large angle scattering data for understanding the interaction between light heavy ions.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Elastic Scattering Collective Excitation Potential Scattering Spin Reorientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    J.S. Blair, Phys. Rev. 115, 928 (1959).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.A. Parks, K.W. Kemper, A.H. Lumpkin et al., Phys. Lett. B 70, 27 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.T. Rudchik, A. Budzanowski, V.K. Chernievsky et al., Nucl. Phys. A 695, 51 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.Yu. Mezhevych, K. Rusek, A.T. Rudchik et al., Nucl. Phys. A 724, 29 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.Yu. Mezhevych, A.T. Rudchik, K. Rusek et al., Nucl. Phys. A 753, 13 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Kowalczyk, SMAN: A Code for Nuclear Experiments, Warsaw University report (1998) unpublished.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu.F. Smirnov, Yu.M. Tchuvil'sky, Phys. Rev. C 15, 84 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.T. Rudchik, Yu.M. Tchuvil'sky, The code DESNA, The Kiev Institute for Nuclear Researches report KIYAI-82-12 (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.T. Rudchik, Yu. M. Tchuvil'sky, Ukr. Fiz. Zh. 30, 819 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B.S. Nilsson, SPI-GENOA: An Optical Model Search Code, Niels Bohr Institute report (1976). .Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I.J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. De Vries, C.W. De Jager, C. De Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36, 495 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Cook, Comput. Phys. Commun. 25, 125 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Cook, Comput. Phys. Commun. 35, 775 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Hnizdo, C.W. Glover, K.W. Kemper, Phys. Rev. C 23, 236 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Yu. Mezhevych
    • 1
  • A. T. Rudchik
    • 1
  • K. Rusek
    • 2
    • 7
  • K. W. Kemper
    • 3
  • S. Kliczewski
    • 4
  • E. I. Koshchy
    • 5
  • A. A. Rudchik
    • 1
  • S. B. Sakuta
    • 6
  • J. Choiński
    • 7
  • B. Czech
    • 4
  • R. Siudak
    • 4
  • A. Szczurek
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Nuclear ResearchKyivUkraine
  2. 2.National Institute for Nuclear ResearchWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Physics DepartmentFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  4. 4.H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear PhysicsCracowPoland
  5. 5.Kharkiv National UniversityKharkivUkraine
  6. 6.Russian Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”MoscowRussia
  7. 7.Heavy Ion Laboratory of Warsaw UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations