Polarization phenomena in the intermediate energy elastic deuteron scattering from 16C and 16O nuclei

  • Yu. A. Berezhnoy
  • D. V. Fedorchenko
  • V. P. Mikhailyuk
  • V. V. Pilipenko
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics


A model based on the multiple diffraction scattering theory and the α-cluster model with dispersion of target nuclei is proposed for describing the behavior of observables for the elastic deuteron scattering from 12C and 16O nuclei at intermediate energies. Differential cross-sections and analyzing powers calculated within this approach for incident-deuteron energies of 400 and 700 MeV are in a reasonable agreement with experimental data.


Target Nucleus Polarization Observable Individual Nucleon Deuteron Spin Deuteron Momentum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.Yu. Korda, Nucl. Phys. A 556, 453 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.Yu. Korda, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 3, 149 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.J. Glauber, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W.E. Brittin, L.G. Dunham (Interscience, New York, 1959) p. 315.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.I. Akhiezer, A.G. Sitenko, Phys. Rev. 106, 1236 (1957).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.L. Rustgi, Nucl. Phys. 59, 460 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.K. Varma, V. Franco, Phys. Rev. C 15, 813 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.S. Al-Khalili, R.C. Johnson, Nucl. Phys. A 546, 622 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.V. Pilipenko, G.A. Khomenko, J. Phys. G 10, 63 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.P. Mikhailyuk, V.V. Pilipenko, J. Phys. G 18, 85 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.P. Mikhailyuk, Eur. Phys. J. A 9, 473 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.P. Mikhailyuk, V.V. Pilipenko, Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 125 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.P. Mikhailyuk, V.V. Pilipenko, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 19, 243 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Van Sen, Ye Yanlin, J. Arvieux, G. Gaillard, B. Bonin, A. Boudard, G. Bruge, J.C. Lugol, T. Hasegawa, F. Soga, L.E. Antonuk, J.M. Cameron, S.T. Lam, G.C. Neilson, G. Roy, D.M. Sheppard, R. Babinet, Nucl. Phys. A 464, 717 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Bertey, L. Bimbot, A. Bondart, J.L. Escudié, J.M. Fountaine, A. Chaumaux, P. Couvert, L. Shecter, J.P. Tabet, Y. Terrien, CEN Saclay, Departement de Physique Nucleaire, Compte rendue d’activité, Note CEA-N-2026, 110.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu.A. Berezhnoy, V.P. Mikhailyuk, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 11, 281 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. A. Berezhnoy
    • 1
  • D. V. Fedorchenko
    • 2
  • V. P. Mikhailyuk
    • 3
  • V. V. Pilipenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Karazin Kharkov National UniversityKharkovUkraine
  2. 2.National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”KharkovUkraine
  3. 3.Institute for Nuclear ResearchKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations