Advertisement

Origin of the pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic formalism

  • S. Marcos
  • M. López-Quelle
  • R. Niembro
  • L. N. Savushkin
Article

Abstract.

The grounds on which the nuclear pseudospin symmetry (PSS) is supposed to be based are analysed within the relativistic mean-field framework. A connection between the mechanisms responsible for the spin-orbit and pseudospin-orbit splittings is shown. The nature of the PSS is investigated through an extended Dirac equation which allows a generalization of the PSS breaking term. It is shown that the PSS breaking in real nuclei can be explained as a result of a non-perturbative transformation from non-physical solutions of the Dirac equation, which satisfy exactly the PSS, to the physical ones. The PSS breaking term produces important, though qualitatively similar, effects on both states of a pseudospin-orbit doublet. The similarity of these effects increases with the number of nodes of the small component of the Dirac spinor of these states.

Keywords

Dirac Equation Relativistic Formalism Small Component Breaking Term Dirac Spinor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Arima, M. Harvey, K. Shimizu, Phys. Lett. B 30, 517 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.T. Hecht, A. Adler, Nucl. Phys. A 137, 129 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Bahri, J.P. Draayer, S.A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2133 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.L. Blokhin, C. Bahri, J.P. Draayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4149 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 436 (1997); Phys. Rep. 315, 231 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.N. Ginocchio, D.G. Madland, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1167 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.N. Ginocchio, J. Phys. G 25, 617 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rep. 315, 231 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.N. Ginocchio, A. Leviatan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 072502 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Sugawara-Tanabe, A. Arima, Phys. Rev. C 58, R3065 (1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, P. Ring, A. Arima, Phys. Rev. C 58, R628 (1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, A. Arima, Phys. Rev. C 59, 154 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Sugawara-Tanabe, J. Meng, S. Yamaji, A. Arima, J. Phys. G 25, 811 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Ring, J. Phys. G 25, 641 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y.K. Gambhir, J.P. Maharana, C.S. Warke, Eur. Phys. J. A 3, 255 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Marcos, L.N. Savushkin, M. López-Quelle, P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054309 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Marcos, M. López-Quelle, R. Niembro, L.N. Savushkin, P. Bernardos, Phys. Lett. B 513, 30 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Marcos, M. López-Quelle, R. Niembro, L.N. Savushkin, P. Bernardos, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 173 (2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Alberto, M. Fiolhais, M. Malheiro, A. Delfino, M. Chiapparini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5015 (2001); Phys. Rev. C 65, 034307 (2002); R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, P. Alberto, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054305 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. López-Quelle, L.N. Savushkin, S. Marcos, P. Bernardos, R. Niembro, to be published in Nucl. Phys. A.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G.F. Torres, J.L. Calvario, Rev. Mex. Fis. 43, 649 (1997); A. Arima, Dynamical Symmetries and Nuclear Structure, preprint RIKEN-AF-NP-276.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.M. Sharma, M.A. Nagarajan, P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 312, 377 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G.A. Lalazissis, J. König, P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 55, 540 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Marcos
    • 1
  • M. López-Quelle
    • 2
  • R. Niembro
    • 1
  • L. N. Savushkin
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Física ModernaUniversidad de CantabriaSantanderSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Física AplicadaUniversidad de CantabriaSantanderSpain
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsSt. Petersburg University for TelecommunicationsSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations