On the optimal mix of renewable energy sources, electrical energy storage and thermoelectric generation for the de-carbonization of the Italian electrical system

  • 10 Accesses


The integration of intermittent renewable energy sources (RES) requires a substantial amount of electrical energy storage and significant increase of the grid capabilities. To keep these upgrades within reasonable limits, strategies maintaining a moderate but flexible thermoelectric power have been investigated. Based on the experimental loads for Italy in 2013, the implications of increasing the contribution of scalable RES, particularly wind and photovoltaic, are investigated in detail. The optimal value of the storage depends on its round-trip efficiency (1.3 TWh for hydroelectric storage and 6 TWh for power to gas). For RES producing 100% of the annual demand, the use of the optimal storage and of about 10 GW of thermoelectric power allows a substantial de-carbonization (more than 90%) of the electricity production still maintaining a capacity factor of the thermoelectric generators above 40%. Avoiding thermoelectric generation is possible but it requires overproduction by RES, between 120 and 200% of the annual electricity demand, depending on the storage technology and the mix between wind and photovoltaic generation. The calculations have been performed for realistic values of the storage round-trip efficiency and for various combinations of photovoltaic and wind powers. The capital costs required are also estimated at current costs of present day technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: The data used in the present study are available at]


  1. 1.

    European Commission communication, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM (2010) 2020 final

  2. 2.

    Ministero dello sviluppo economico, Strategia Energetica Nazionale: per un'energia piu' competitiva e sostenibile (2013), Accessed 19 Dec 2017

  3. 3.

    J. Rogelj, M. Schaeffer, B. Hare, Timetables for Zero emissions and 2050 emissions reductions: State of the Science for the ADP Agreement. Clim. Anal. (2015)

  4. 4.

    F. Wagner, Electricity by intermittent sources: an analysis based on the German situation 2012. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 20 (2014)

  5. 5.

    F. Romanelli, Strategies for the integration of intermittent renewable energy sources in the electrical system. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131(3), 53 (2016)

  6. 6.

    F. Wagner, Surplus from and storage of electricity generated by intermittent sources. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 12 (2016)

  7. 7.

    F. Wagner, E. Rachelew, Study on a hypothetical replacement of nuclear electricity by wind power in Sweden. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 173 (2016)

  8. 8.

    F. Wagner, F. Wertz, Characteristics of electricity generation with intermittent sources depending on the time resolution of the input data. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 284 (2016)

  9. 9.

    F. Wagner, Considerations for an EU-wide use of renewable energies for electricity generation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 219 (2014)

  10. 10.

    TERNA Dati statistici sull'energia elettrica in Italia 2013; Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  11. 11.

    Eurelectric (2011) Hydro in Europe: Powering renewables. Full report. Accessed 25 Mar 2018

  12. 12.

    M. Gimeno-Gutiérrez, R. Lacal-Arántegui, Assessment of the European potential for pumped hydropower energy storage, Report EUR 25940 EN ISBN 978-92-79-29511-9. (2013).

  13. 13.

    L. Serri, J. Alterach, G. Stella, F. Colucci, A. Danelli, Implementazione della versione base dell’Atlante Integrato e costruzione di mappe specifiche. RSE, Ricerca di Sistema, Piano Annuale di Realizzazione 2016, Rapporto 17000266 (2017)

  14. 14.

    K. Ghaib, F. Ben-Fares, Power-to-methane: a state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81(Part 1), 433–446 (2018)

  15. 15.

    H. Blanco, A. Faaij, A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focuson power to gas and long-term storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 81, 1049–1086 (2018)

  16. 16.

    G. Fuchs, B. Lunz, M. Leuthold, D. Uwe Sauer, Technology Overview on Electricity Storage (2012), Accessed 1 Apr 2018

  17. 17.

    Underground Gas Storage in the World–2017 Status, Report prepared by Sylvie Cornot-Gandolphe for CEDIGAZ (July 2017).

  18. 18. Accessed 10 June 2018

  19. 19. Accessed 11 July 2018

  20. 20. Accessed 7 May 2018

  21. 21.

    M. Azadeh, M. Fowler, Review transition of future energy system infrastructure; through power-to-gas pathways. Energies 10, 1089 (2017).

  22. 22.

    D. Garcia, F. Barbanera et al., Expert opinion analysis on renewable hydrogen storage systems potential in Europe. Energies 9, 963 (2016).

  23. 23.

    M. Sterner, Bioenergy and renewable power methane in integrated 100% renewable energy systems, Band 14/Vol. 14, Edited by Universität Kassel. ISBN: 978-3-89958-798-2 (2009)

  24. 24.

    H. Ergun, D. Van Hertem, Comparison of HVAC and HVDC technologies, HVDV Grids: For Offshore and Supergrid of the Future (Chapter 4). ISBN: 978-1-118-85915-5, Wiley (2016)

Download references


The authors thank TERNA for the support given on the screening of the data.

Author information

Correspondence to M. Gelfusa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romanelli, F., Gelfusa, M. On the optimal mix of renewable energy sources, electrical energy storage and thermoelectric generation for the de-carbonization of the Italian electrical system. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 72 (2020).

Download citation