Advertisement

\(t \rightarrow cg\) and \(t \rightarrow cZ\) in universal extra-dimensional models

  • Cheng-Wei Chiang
  • Ujjal Kumar DeyEmail author
  • Tapoja Jha
Regular Article

Abstract.

In this work we perform a complete one-loop calculation of the flavor-changing top quark decays \(t\rightarrow cg\) and \(t\rightarrow cZ\) in the universal extra-dimensional models. We find that the branching ratios of these decays in the minimal scenario remain unaltered from the Standard Model expectations for currently allowed values of the inverse compactification radius. In the non-minimal setup, the branching ratios can be enhanced from the Standard Model due to the presence of boundary localized terms which modify the mass spectrum and couplings in the theory in a non-trivial way. We also check the compatibility of the parameter choices that result in enhancements in these rare decays with other experimental observations.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Antoniadis, Phys. Lett. B 246, 377 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998) hep-ph/9803315ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998) hep-ph/9804398ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999) hep-ph/9905221ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999) hep-th/9906064ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, B.A. Dobrescu, Phys. Rev. D 64, 035002 (2001) hep-ph/0012100ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.-C. Cheng, K.T. Matchev, M. Schmaltz, Phys. Rev. D 66, 036005 (2002) hep-ph/0204342ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Choudhury, K. Ghosh, Phys. Lett. B 763, 155 (2016) arXiv:1606.04084ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Beuria, A. Datta, D. Debnath, K.T. Matchev, Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 187 (2018) arXiv:1702.00413ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Deutschmann, T. Flacke, J.S. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 771, 515 (2017) arXiv:1702.00410ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Chakraborty, S. Niyogi, K. Sridhar, JHEP 07, 105 (2017) arXiv:1704.07048ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.T. Arun, D. Choudhury, D. Sachdeva, Living orthogonally: Quasi-universal extra dimensions arXiv:1805.01642Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Ghosh, D. Karabacak, S. Nandi, Universal extra dimension models with gravity mediated decays after LHC Run II data, arXiv:1805.11124Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Blennow, H. Melbeus, T. Ohlsson, H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 712, 419 (2012) arXiv:1112.5339ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Datta, S. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 87, 035018 (2013) arXiv:1207.0476ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Georgi, A.K. Grant, G. Hailu, Phys. Lett. B 506, 207 (2001) hep-ph/0012379ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Carena, T.M.P. Tait, C.E.M. Wagner, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 2355 (2002) hep-ph/0207056ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Flacke, A. Menon, D.J. Phalen, Phys. Rev. D 79, 056009 (2009) arXiv:0811.1598ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, JHEP 02, 051 (2003) hep-th/0302023ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, S773 (2004) hep-ph/0310352ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Acta Phys. Pol. B 34, 5511 (2003) hep-ph/0310353ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, JHEP 10, 056 (2006) hep-ph/0601222ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki, S. Niyogi, JHEP 11, 154 (2012) arXiv:1206.3987ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki, S. Niyogi, JHEP 01, 104 (2014) arXiv:1310.6994ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.K. Dey, T.S. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056016 (2013) arXiv:1305.1016ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Datta, A. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 93, 055048 (2016) arXiv:1506.08024ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Datta, A. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015033 (2017) arXiv:1610.09924ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Biswas, A. Shaw, S.K. Patra, Phys. Rev. D 97, 035019 (2018) arXiv:1708.08938ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Dasgupta, U.K. Dey, T. Jha, T.S. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055006 (2018) arXiv:1801.09722ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Datta, U.K. Dey, A. Raychaudhuri, A. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 88, 016011 (2013) arXiv:1305.4507ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Flacke, D.W. Kang, K. Kong, G. Mohlabeng, S.C. Park, JHEP 04, 041 (2017) arXiv:1702.02949ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Jha, J. Phys. G 45, 115002 (2018) arXiv:1604.02481ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Jha, A. Datta, JHEP 03, 012 (2015) arXiv:1410.5098ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    U.K. Dey, T. Jha, Phys. Rev. D 94, 056011 (2016) arXiv:1602.03286ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Datta, U.K. Dey, A. Shaw, A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 87, 076002 (2013) arXiv:1205.4334ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Datta, A. Raychaudhuri, A. Shaw, Phys. Lett. B 730, 42 (2014) arXiv:1310.2021ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Shaw, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 33 (2015) arXiv:1405.3139ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Shaw, Status of exclusion limits of the KK-parity non-conserving resonance production with updated 13 TeV LHC, arXiv:1709.08077Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Eilam, J.L. Hewett, A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1473 (1991) Phys. Rev. D 59ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S. Bejar, J. Guasch, J. Sola, Nucl. Phys. B 600, 21 (2001) hep-ph/0011091ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    E.O. Iltan, Phys. Rev. D 65, 075017 (2002) hep-ph/0111318ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. Arhrib, Phys. Rev. D 72, 075016 (2005) hep-ph/0510107ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. Abbas, A. Celis, X.-Q. Li, J. Lu, A. Pich, JHEP 06, 005 (2015) arXiv:1503.06423ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Gaitán, R. Martinez, J.H.M. de Oca, Higgs-like scalar and $t\rightarrow cZ$ decays in the 2HDM type III with CP violation, arXiv:1710.04262Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. Gaitan, O.G. Miranda, L.G. Cabral-Rosetti, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034018 (2005) hep-ph/0410268ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. Frank, I. Turan, Phys. Rev. D 72, 035008 (2005) hep-ph/0506197ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. Guasch, J. Sola, Nucl. Phys. B 562, 3 (1999) hep-ph/9906268ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    J.J. Cao, G. Eilam, M. Frank, K. Hikasa, G.L. Liu, I. Turan, J.M. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 75, 075021 (2007) hep-ph/0702264ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Cao, C. Han, L. Wu, J.M. Yang, M. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3058 (2014) arXiv:1404.1241ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. Dedes, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho, K. Tamvakis, JHEP 11, 137 (2014) arXiv:1409.6546ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    G. Eilam, A. Gemintern, T. Han, J.M. Yang, X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 510, 227 (2001) hep-ph/0102037ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. Cao, Z. Heng, L. Wu, J.M. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 79, 054003 (2009) arXiv:0812.1698ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    D. Bardhan, G. Bhattacharyya, D. Ghosh, M. Patra, S. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. D 94, 015026 (2016) arXiv:1601.04165ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    K. Agashe, G. Perez, A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 75, 015002 (2007) hep-ph/0606293ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    T.-J. Gao, T.-F. Feng, J.-B. Chen, JHEP 02, 029 (2013) arXiv:1303.0082ADSGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    A. Diaz-Furlong, M. Frank, N. Pourtolami, M. Toharia, R. Xoxocotzi, Phys. Rev. D 94, 036001 (2016) arXiv:1603.08929ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    G.A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, R. Martinez, J.A. Rodriguez, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 919 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    K. Agashe, R. Contino, Phys. Rev. D 80, 075016 (2009) arXiv:0906.1542ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    A. Cordero-Cid, M.A. Perez, G. Tavares-Velasco, J.J. Toscano, Phys. Rev. D 70, 074003 (2004) hep-ph/0407127ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    A. Datta, M. Duraisamy, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074008 (2010) arXiv:0912.4785ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    J.L. Diaz-Cruz, R. Martinez, M.A. Perez, A. Rosado, Phys. Rev. D 41, 891 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    B. Mele, S. Petrarca, A. Soddu, Phys. Lett. B 435, 401 (1998) hep-ph/9805498ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, B.M. Nobre, Phys. Lett. B 553, 251 (2003) hep-ph/0210360ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Acta Phys. Pol. B 35, 2695 (2004) hep-ph/0409342ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    K.-F. Chen, W.-S. Hou, C. Kao, M. Kohda, Phys. Lett. B 725, 378 (2013) arXiv:1304.8037ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    H. Khanpour, S. Khatibi, M. Khatiri Yanehsari, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Phys. Lett. B 775, 25 (2017) arXiv:1408.2090ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    H. Hesari, H. Khanpour, M. Khatiri Yanehsari, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014, 476490 (2014) arXiv:1412.8572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    D. Kim, M. Park, Phys. Lett. B 758, 190 (2016) arXiv:1507.03990ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    H. Hesari, H. Khanpour, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113012 (2015) arXiv:1508.07579ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    S. Khatibi, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Nucl. Phys. B 909, 607 (2016) arXiv:1511.00220ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    M. Malekhosseini, M. Ghominejad, H. Khanpour, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Constraining top quark flavor violation and dipole moments through three and four-top quark productions at the LHC, arXiv:1804.05598Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    S. Banerjee, M. Chala, M. Spannowsky, Top quark FCNCs in extended Higgs sectors, arXiv:1806.02836Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, M. Kolanovic, F. Nitti, Phys. Rev. D 64, 084004 (2001) hep-ph/0102216ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Some consequences of brane kinetic terms for bulk fermions, in 38th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories Les Arcs, France, March 15–22, 2003 (2003) hep-ph/0305119Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    T. Flacke, K. Kong, S.C. Park, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1530003 (2015) arXiv:1408.4024ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    A. Muck, The standard model in 5D: Theoretical consistency and experimental constraints, PhD thesis, Wurzburg U. (2004)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    A. Datta, A. Shaw, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31, 1650181 (2016) arXiv:1408.0635ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    T. Flacke, K. Kong, S.C. Park, JHEP 05, 111 (2013) arXiv:1303.0872ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    F.J. Petriello, JHEP 05, 003 (2002) hep-ph/0204067ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    H.H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276 (2015) arXiv:1503.01469ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    T. Hahn, M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999) hep-ph/9807565ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    D0 Collaboration (V.M. Abazov et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032002 (2014) arXiv:1405.1756ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Particle Data Group Collaboration (C. Patrignani et al.), Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    J.I. Aranda, M.G. López-Valdovinos, F. Ramirez-Zavaleta, J.J. Toscano, E.S. Tututi, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 468, 012002 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new high-mass resonances in the dilepton final state using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2016-045, CERN, Geneva, Aug, 2016Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    CMS Collaboration, Search for a high-mass resonance decaying into a dilepton final state in 13fb^-1 of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-EXO-16-031, CERN, Geneva, 2016Google Scholar
  87. 87.
  88. 88.
    ATLAS Collaboration (G. Aad et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 55 (2016) arXiv:1509.00294ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    CMS Collaboration (V. Khachatryan et al.), JHEP 02, 028 (2017) arXiv:1610.03545Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for flavour-changing neutral current top quark decays $t\rightarrow qZ$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2017-070, CERN, Geneva, Sep, 2017Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    CMS Collaboration (A.M. Sirunyan et al.), JHEP 07, 003 (2017) arXiv:1702.01404Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Institute of PhysicsSachivalaya MargOdishaIndia
  4. 4.Homi Bhabha National InstituteTraining School ComplexMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations