Experimental analysis and FLUENT simulation of a stratified chilled water storage system

  • J. L. TangEmail author
  • Z. R. OuYang
  • Y. Y. Shi
Regular Article


The purpose of this study is to figure out the hydrodynamic disturbance characteristics and chilled water storage efficiency improvement technique of a storage tank by a series of experimental analysis and FLUENT simulation. A new type of diffusion nozzle was designed, which stemmed from the Coanda effect, and an optimization is done by the numerical simulation method. Comparison analysis by FLUENT simulation on different diffusion angles of the nozzle was made, and the hydrodynamic disturbance was minimal when the diffusion surface was flat and the outlet edge of the nozzle was radial. The diffuser performance testing platform was designed and installed for comparative experimental analysis of various types of diffuser. Three groups of experiments are carried out under the original octagonal diffuser, the octagonal diffuser with nozzles and the octagonal diffuser with nozzles and uniform flow orifice. The chilled water storage efficiency could reach up to 90% when the third scheme was selected.


  1. 1.
    A. Musser, W.P. Bahnfleth, HVAC&R Res. 7, 205 (2001)
  2. 2.
    M.A. Karim, Appl. Therm. Eng. 31, 1853 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.L. Tang, Z.R. OuYang, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 10, 95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Mawire, M. McPherson, Appl. Therm. Eng. 2, 1086 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.C. Guyer, D.L. Brownell, Review of Heat Storage Materials EPRI report, EM-3353 (EPRI, 1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jae Dong Chung, Sung Hwan Cho, Choon Seob Tae, Hosen Yoo, Renew. Energy 33, 2236 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Francesco Lalli, Antonello Bruschi, Rodolfo Lama et al., Coast. Eng. 57, 278 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor, M.J.H., Jane’s Encyclopedia of Aviation (Studio Editions, London, 1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Alvi, P. Strykowski, A. Krothapalli, D. Forliti, J. Fluids Eng. 122, 3 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Saeed, G. Gratton, C. Mares, Aeronaut. J. 115, 683 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antonio Dumasa, Maharshi Subhash et al., Energy Proc. 45, 626 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.W. Wildin, C.R. Truman, Evaluation of Stratified Chilled Water Storage, Techniques EPRI report, EM-4352, Vol. 1 (EPRI, 1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anan Garzozi, David Greenblatt, Energy 150, 965 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Dunham, J. Fluid Mech. 33, 495 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mi-Soo Shin, Hey-Suk Kim, Dong-Soon Jang et al., Appl. Therm. Eng. 24, 17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.L. Tang, Y.Y. Shi et al., Chin. J. Low Temp. Phys. 39, 51 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.High Magnetic Field LaboratoryChinese Academy of SciencesHefeiChina
  2. 2.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations