Mathematical modeling of injectivity damage with oil droplets in the waste produced water re-injection of the linear flow

  • Afshin DavarpanahEmail author
  • Behnam Mirshekari
Regular Article


The formation damage issue is considered as the substantial phenomenon in petroleum industries when the produced water re-injection (PWRI) taken into the operational performance. Due to the current complexities of the interaction between the mechanical and petrophysical properties, and water quality is of importance. Regarding the previous research articles which clearly shown that only a little amount of oil droplets in the injected water would cause severe potential damages. However, there are several experimental evaluations are taken into the report to emphasize the importance of this issue, the objective of this paper to propose an analytical and mathematical model to predict the injectivity decline behavior which is in good agreement with the experimental data. To do this, two types of experimental data from Ottawa and SiC sandpack are used to model a time-dependent progression of water permeability decrease in the linear flow. As a result, the increase of captured oil saturation, the amount of permeability has reduced regarding the relationship of relative permeability drainage. Furthermore, this reduction would be stabilized when the equilibrium oil saturation was controlled by the injection velocity and the size of oil droplets.


  1. 1.
    A. Davarpanah, Appl. Water Sci. 8, 75 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Davarpanah, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 35387 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Davarpanah, A. Razmjoo, B. Mirshekari, Cogent Environ. Sci. 4, 1 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Shirmohammadi, M. Soltanieh, L.M. Romeo, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 37, 1075 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Li, V. Prigiobbe, Transp. Porous Media 122, 745 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Russell, P. Bedrikovetsky, Chem. Eng. Sci. 190, 98 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Yu et al., Adv. Water Resour. 121, 150 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Roque, Mechanisms of formation damage by retention of particles suspended in injection water, in SPE European Formation Damage Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.H. Barkman, D.H. Davidson, J. Petrol. Technol. 24, 865 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Pedenaud, Improving Produced Water Quality Discharge into the Sea by Using Hungry Bacteria, in SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Sharma, Y. Yortsos, AIChE J. 33, 1636 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Sutton-Sharp et al., Water Practice Technol. 13, 303 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Buret, L. Nabzar, A. Jada, Emulsion deposition in porous media: impact on well injectivity, in Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Buret, L. Nabzar, A. Jada, SPE J. 15, 557 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Ochi, External filter cake properties during injection of produced waters, in SPE European Formation Damage Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.S. Abou-Sayed, Produced Water Management Strategy Water-Injection Best Practices-Design, Performance, Monitoring, in International Petroleum Technology Conference (IPTC, 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Jin, A.K. Wojtanowicz, Minimum produced water from oil wells with water-coning control and water-loop installations, in SPE Americans E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Ochi, J.-L. Detienne, P. Rivet, Internal formation damage properties and oil deposition profile, in European Formation Damage Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Rousseau, H. Latifa, L. Nabzar, SPE Product. Oper. 23, 525 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Shirmohammadi, N. Gilani, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy (2018)
  21. 21.
    P. Chen, Assessment of Produced Water Reinjection in a Giant Carbonate Reservoir, in SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Clark, J. Veil, Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States (Argonne National Lab., Argonne, IL, 2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Fischer, Integrated Modeling of Formation Damage and Multiple Induced Hydraulic Fractures During Produced Water Reinjection, in SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H.A. Ohen, A systematic laboratory core and fluid analysis program for the design of a cost effective treatment and cleanup guidelines for a produced water disposal scheme, in SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1996)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Soo, C. Radke, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 102, 462 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.A. Veil, J.J. Quinn, Downhole Separation Technology Performance: Relationship to Geologic Conditions, Report to the US Dept. of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Zhang, J. Somerville, A. Todd, An experimental investigation of the formation damage caused by produced oily water injection, in Offshore Europe (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Moghadasi et al., J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 43, 163 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Jordan, Management of Scale Control in Produced Water Reinjection-The Near Wellbore Scale Challenge Overcome, in SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference and Exhibition (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Soo, C. Radke, Chem. Eng. Sci. 41, 263 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Soo, C.J. Radke, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 23, 342 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Civan, Reservoir formation damage: fundamentals, modeling, assessment, and mitigation, 2nd. (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Satter et al., Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 20, 129 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. RP40, Recommended practices for core analysis (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E.T. Description, Schlumberger Simulation Software Manuals (Schlumberger, Sugar Land, TX, 2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R.H. Brooks, A.T. Corey, J. Irrigat. Drain. Div. 92, 61 (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica / Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum Engineering, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations