Advertisement

A decision support system for preventive conservation: From measurements towards decision making

  • Olivier SchalmEmail author
  • Ana Cabal
  • Willemien Anaf
  • Diana Leyva Pernia
  • Jan Callier
  • Natalie Ortega
Regular Article
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Focus Point on Scientific Research in Conservation Science

Abstract.

We present a decision-support system that guides heritage guardians in selecting mitigation actions to improve the indoor air quality and thus the preservation conditions of indoor collections in heritage buildings. This contribution shows that it is feasible to build a decision support system dedicated to preventive conservation when the following barriers are overcome: 1) simultaneous measurement of a wide range of environmental parameters in order to detect a larger number of undesired situations; 2) development of an algorithm to perform reproducible indoor air quality assessments; and 3) transformation of the air quality assessment into a graph that can be read intuitively without causing a wide variation of interpretations among stakeholders. An important aspect of the decision support system is that it reduces several sources of uncertainty that hamper reliable indoor air quality assessments. The possibilities of such a system are illustrated with a measurement campaign in a church where a heating system has been installed and used for the first time.

References

  1. 1.
    R.W. Fleming, Vision Res. 94, 62 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Henderson, R. Waller, Stud. Conserv. 61, 308 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Econometrica 47, 263 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Michalski, M. Rossi-Doria, ICOM Committee for Conservation, 16th Triennial Meeting (Lisbon, Portugal, 2011) p. 1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Strang, Preservation of electronic records: new knowledge and decision-making (Ottawa, 2003) p. 1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N.P. Rougier, M. Droetboom, P.E. Bourne, PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003833 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.W.J. Rittel, M.M. Webber, Policy Sci. 4, 155 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ICOMOS (2014) International Charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (The Venice Charter, 1965) https://doi.org/www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed 25 June 2018)
  10. 10.
    O. Schalm et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 364, 012056 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management -- vocabularyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Briggs, Uncertainty: The Soul of Modeling, Probability & Statistics (Springer, New York, 2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.M. Grzywacz, Monitoring for Gaseous Pollutants in Museum Environments (Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.A. Ankersmit, N.H. Tennent, S.F. Watts, Atmos. Environ. 39, 695 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Leyva Pernia et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 364, 012045 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Ashley-Smith, A. Burmester, M. Eibl (Editors), Climate for Collections. Standards and Uncertainties (Doerner Institute, Munich, 2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Storme, O. Schalm, R. Wiesinger, Herit. Sci. 3, 25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ’t Hart L. et al., Appl. Phys. A 122, 923 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Madon et al., Science 318, 1728 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Olswang, P.A. Prelock, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 58, S1818 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.C. McNie, Environ. Sci. Pol. 10, 17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Dillon et al., Herit. Sci. 2, 11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Weichselgartner, R. Kasperson, Global Environ. Chang. 20, 266 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, P. Slovic (Editors), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Arnott, G. Pervan, J. Inf. Technol. 20, 67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Arnott G. Pervan, Decision Support Syst. 44, 657 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. Geng, H.J. Hamilton, ACM Comput. Surv. 38, 9 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ISO14971:2007, Medical devices -- Application of risk management to medical devicesGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ISO 31000:2009, Risk management -- Principles and guidelines on implementationGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J.L. Perdersoli, C. Antomarchi, S. Michalski, A Guide to Risk Management of Cultural Heritage (ICCROM, 2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Ankersmit, M. Stappers, Managing Indoor Climate Risks in Museums (Springer, Amsterdam, 2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Bratasz et al., Strain 51, 78 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Jakiela, L. Bratasz, R. Kozlowski, Wood Sci. Technol. 42, 268 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Prosek et al., Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 43, 129 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Dubus et al., Stud. Conserv. 55, 121 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Dubus, T. Prosek, e-Preserv. Sci. 9, 67 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Austin, PLOS ONE 10, e0137789 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Marchetti et al., Build. Environ. 126, 132 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    P. Di Justo, E. Gertz, Atmospheric Monitoring with Arduino: Building Simple Devices to Collect Data about the Environment (O’Reilly, Beijing, 2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Leyva, New approach to indoors air quality assessment for cultural heritage conservation, Indoor air (Ghent, 2016) paper 784Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    W. Anaf, D. Leyva Pernia, O. Schalm, Geosci. J. 8, 276 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Pravossoudovitch et al., Ergonomics 57, 503 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    E.C. McNie, Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conservation StudiesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Antwerp Maritime AcademyAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsCEADENHavanaCuba
  4. 4.War Heritage InstituteBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Computer ScienceUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  6. 6.Royal Museums of Fine Arts of BelgiumBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations