Advertisement

Restricting microplastics in the European Union: Process and criteria under REACH

  • Esther KentinEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Focus Point on Microplastic Pollution: Assessment, Effects and Mitigation Strategies

Abstract.

As part of the EU Plastics Strategy, the European Commission has initiated the restriction process regarding intentionally added microplastics under REACH (acronym of the EU chemical regulation). A restriction dossier is compiled by ECHA according the provisions of REACH. Not only environmental and health risk assessments have to be made, but a large part of the dossier concerns socio-economic analyses and evaluations of risk management options, in order to justify a Union-wide restriction. The procedure reflects the multiple objectives of REACH: protection of human health and the environment, but also the functioning of the internal market. Although the precautionary principle is incorporated in REACH, it plays a less than subordinate role. The process of restriction offers interested parties the possibility to present information and evidence. For the restriction dossier on microplastics is of utmost importance that all available evidence is provided. When less data is available, restriction seems to be less likely.

References

  1. 1.
    Council Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 on the Registration, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) [2006] OJ L 33/1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission, Note for the attention of Mr G. Dancet, Executive Director, ECHA, 9 November 2017, Ref. Ares (2017) 5463573Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EC, Intentionally added microplastics in products: final report (European Commission, Brussels, 2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, SWD (2018) 16 final, COM (2018) 28 final 16 January 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EU Survey, Investigating options for reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products, https://doi.org/echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/microplastics
  6. 6.
    C.M. Rochman, A.M. Cook, A.A. Koelmans, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 1617 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Fisher, J. Risk Res. 11, 541 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, [2008] OJ L353/1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Bergkamp, The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals: Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Fisher, Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 23, 163 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD, Data analysis of the identification of correlations between polymer characteristics and potential for health or ecotoxicological concern (OECD, Paris, 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products OJ L342/59 (Cosmetics Regulation)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (1999/468/EC) OJ L 184, Articles 5a and 7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ECHA, Call for evidence on the use of intentionally added microplastic particles in products of any kind, 1 March 2018, https://doi.org/echa.europa.eu/calls-for-comments-and-evidence/-/substance-rev/19224/term
  16. 16.
    ECHA, Guidance for the preparation of an Annex XV dossier for restrictions (ECHA, 2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ECHA, Addendum to the guidance on Annex XV for restrictions and the guidance on socio-economic analysis (SEA) -- restrictions, Format of Annex XV restriction report, Version 2.1, 17 May 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.J. Verschoor, Towards a Definition of Microplastics - Considerations for the Specification of Physico-Chemical Properties (RIVM, 2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loi n$^{\circ}$ 2016-1087 du 8 aot 2016 pour la reconquête de la biodiversité, de la nature et des paysages, TA n$^{\circ}$ 803, https://doi.org/www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/ta/ta0803.asp, Translation provided by Isaure Simonin, student of the Leiden Advocacy Project on Plastic
  20. 20.
    H.H.R. 1321 ---Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015, 114th Congress (2015--2016), https://doi.org/www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1321.R.1321
  21. 21.
    H.A. Leslie, Review of Microplastics in Cosmetics (IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, 2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    UNEP, Plastic in Cosmetics: Are we Polluting the Environment through our Personal Care? (UNEP, 2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Acrylates Copolymer and 33 Related Cosmetic Ingredients, in International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 21 (Suppl. 3), 1 (2002)  https://doi.org/10.1080/10915810290169800
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    T. Gouin et al., SOFW J. 141, 40 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    UNEP, Draft resolution on marine litter and microplastics, 5 December 2017, UNEP/EA.3/L.20Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.L. Andrady, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 1596 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Lambert, M. Wagner, in Freshwater Microplastics: Emerging Environmental Contaminants?, edited by M. Wagner, S. Lambert (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P.K. Cheung, L. Fok, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 109, 582 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    EFTA, Case E-9/2016Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Vaughan, EU chemicals regulation: new governance, hybridity and REACH (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England, 2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    P. Birnie, A. Boyle, C. Redgwell, International law and the environment (OUP, Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Calliess, H. Stockhaus, J. Eur. Environ. Plan. Law 9, 113 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Leiden Law SchoolLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations