Advertisement

Qubit systems subject to unbalanced random telegraph noise: quantum correlations, non-Markovianity and teleportation

  • Simone Daniotti
  • Claudia BenedettiEmail author
  • Matteo G. A. Paris
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Issue: Quantum Correlations

Abstract

We address the dynamics of quantum correlations in a two-qubit system subject to unbalanced random telegraph noise (RTN) and discuss in details the similarities and the differences with the balanced case. We also evaluate quantum non-Markovianity of the dynamical map. Finally, we discuss the effects of unbalanced RTN on teleportation, showing that noise imbalance mitigates decoherence and preserves teleportation fidelity.

Graphical abstract

References

  1. 1.
    D. Loss, D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.E. Kane, Progr. Phys. 48, 1023 (2000) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.J. Reilly, NPJ Quantum Inf. 1, 15011 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Weissman et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 537 (1988) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Paladino et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 361 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Nakamura, C.D. Chen, J.S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2328 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Nakamura, Yu. A. Pashkin, J.S. Tsai, Nature 398, 786 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.E. Mooij et al., Science 285, 1036 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.R. Friedman et al., Nature 406, 43 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Fujisawa et al., Science 282, 932 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.R. Petta et al., Science 309, 2180 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. Shi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 140503 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Itakura, Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 67, 195320 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Hu, S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100501 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.K. Gamble et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, 035302 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.B. Zorin et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 13682 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V.A. Krupenin et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 3212 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.W. Jung et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 768 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.L. Stoop et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 014009 (2017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Kurdak et al., Phys Rev. B 56, 9813 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K.S. Ralls et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 228 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.J. Kirton, M.J. Uren, Adv. Phys. 38, 367 (1989) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Sung-Min et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 58, 67 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Kaczer et al., Microelectron. Eng. 109, 123 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Black et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1476 (1983) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Ludviksson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 950 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D.J. Reilly, Quantum Inf. 1, 15011 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Steffen et al., Nature 500, 319 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Hirose, P. Cappellaro, Nature 532, 77 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Benedetti, F. Buscemi, P. Bordone, M.G.A. Paris, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10, 1241005 (2012) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Benedetti, M.G.A. Paris, S. Maniscalco, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012114 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    W.K. Wootters, Philos. Trans.: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 356, 1717 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Bylicka, D. Chruściński, S. Maniscalco, Sci. Rep. 4, 5720 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D.R. Cox, H.D. Miller, in The Theory of Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1965), p. 172 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. Fitzhugh, Math. Biosc. 64, 75 (1983) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    T.M. Buehler et al., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 6827 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    T. Fujisawa, Y. Hirayama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 543 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. Kamioka et al., New J. Phys. 11, 025002 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Bergli, Y.M. Galperin, B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024509 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Bergli, Y.M. Galperin, B.L. Altshuler, New J. Phys. 11, 025002 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Fern, Expectations of two-level telegraph noise, https://doi.org/arXiv:quant-ph/0611020
  44. 44.
    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    O. Gühne, G. Tóth, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M.B. Plenio, S. Virmani, Quant. Inf. Comput. 7, 1 (2007) Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    G. Vidal, R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    B.-H. Liu et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 931 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M.G.A. Paris, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 203, 61 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, J. Piilo, Sci. Rep. 4, 4620 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Y. Dong, Y. Zheng, S. Li, C.-C. Li, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, F.-W. Sun, Quantum Inf. 4, 3 (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    H.-P. Breuer, E.M. Laine, J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Z. He, J. Zou, L. Li, B. Shao, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012108 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, SIF, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quantum Technology Lab, Dipartimento di Fisica Aldo Pontremoli, Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations