# Non-minimal coupling influence on the deviation from de Sitter cosmological expansion

## Abstract

We investigate the models of cosmological inflation in generalized scalar–tensor gravity, which we consider as a source of deviation from de Sitter dynamics in the case of GR. Within the framework of the proposed approach, the exact equations of cosmological dynamics and parameters of cosmological perturbations are obtained.

## 1 Introduction

The inflationary paradigm is currently the main approach to describing the evolution of the early universe avoiding the horizon, flatness and homogeneity problems [1, 2, 3, 4]. Also inflation describes the formation of large scale structure of the universe in the context of the origin of primary inhomogeneities and relict gravitational waves [5, 6] (for review, see [7, 8]). Most of the first inflationary models were based on the Einstein gravity coupled to self-interacting scalar field in Friedmann universe [2, 3, 4] while the pioneering work by Starobinsky [1] was related to modified f(R) gravity which arose from quantum one-loop contributions of conformally covariant matter fields.

At the present time, to explain the stage of the accelerated expansion of the universe [9, 10] (the construction of dark energy models), the cosmological models of modified f(R) gravity, which differ from Einstein gravity are actively considered [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] (for review, see [17]). One of the oldest generalizations of GR, the scalar–tensor gravity (STG), also can describe the early and later inflation [18].

Let us note that both f(R) gravity and STG are conformally related to GR with a scalar field minimally coupled to gravity. The original papers where it was shown are [19] for an arbitrary f(R) and [20] for a more general scalar–tensor case. Such conformal connection of the models with f(R) gravity and GR is considered, for example, in the work [21]. The conformal connection of cosmological models on the basis of STG and GR have been studied for example, in [22]. Therefore, on the basis of the inverse conformal transformation from GR to STG it is possible to find the connection between STG and f(R) gravity. Such conformal connection between f(R) gravity and STG have been considered, for example, in [23, 24].

Scalar–tensor gravity theories are important extensions of GR, which can explain both the initial inflationary evolution, as well as the late accelerating expansion of the Universe. The examples of inflationary models on the basis of scalar–tensor gravity theories with the exact solutions were considered in the works [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Also, in the articles [32, 33] the equations of cosmological dynamics for STG were reduced to ones for the Einstein gravity in the case of the Friedman–Robertson–Walker metric by a specific choice of the coupling function and the kinetic function. This makes it easy to translate the solutions obtained for standard GR cosmology to the case of inflation based on STG. For this purpose it is possible to use the examples of exact solutions for inflation based on the Einstein gravity represented in [34, 35]. Also it is of interest to pay attention to a new class of exact inflationary solutions in GR dubbed the constant-roll ones which found in [36] and they compared with observations in [37].

In this paper, we consider the generalized scalar–tensor gravity theory and a deviation during inflationary stage from de Sitter expansion for such theories. This approach allow us to comply with the inflationary paradigm which implies quasi de Sitter expansion at an early stage of the evolution of the universe. Also we obtain the exact solutions of the cosmological dynamic equations and the parameters of cosmological perturbations in the generalized scalar–tensor gravity.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we represent the generalized scalar–tensor (GST) theory which includes Brance–Dicke and induced gravity. We discuss the relation between scalar–tensor gravity and Einstein gravity with self-interacting scalar field. Also we write down cosmological equations for generalized scalar–tensor theory and note the transition to Friedmann cosmology. Section 3 is devoted to conformal connection GST cosmology with GR cosmology. In Sect. 4 we introduce a connection (ansatz) of the Hubble parameter to non-minimal coupling function which fixes the deviation of Hubble parameter in GST cosmology from de Sitter stage in GR cosmology. In this way the non-minimal coupling function defines the evolution of a scalar field and the deviation of the potential from it in de Sitter stage. In Sect. 5 we consider, as an example, the inflation with power-law Hubble parameter and coupling function. The set of special class of exact solutions are obtained. The features of the slow-roll regime are considered. Section 6 is devoted to cosmological perturbations for the GST gravity under consideration. General relations for parameters of cosmological perturbations in terms of suggested ansatz are derived, including power spectrums, spectral indexes and tensor-to-scalar ratio. Using observation data from PLANCK observatory we estimate the value of model parameter which gives a good correspondence to observations. In Sect. 7 we discuss obtained results and conclude about advantages of STG gravity.

## 2 Scalar Einstein–Friedmann and generalized scalar–tensor cosmologies

*g*a determinant of the spacetime metric \(g_{\mu \nu }\), \(\phi \) the scalar field with the potential \(V=V(\phi )\), \(f(\phi )\) and \(F(\phi )\) are the differentiable functions of \(\phi \),

*R*is the Ricci scalar curvature of the spacetime, \(L^{(m)}\) is the Lagrangian of the matter. The action (1) is the generalization associated with the scalar–tensor Brans–Dicke gravity where the linear interaction of the scalar field \(\phi \) to gravity is replaced by an coupling function \(F(\phi ) \) of the gravitational (non-material) scalar field. In the present article we will study the case of vacuum solutions for the model (1) suggesting that \( S^{(m)}=0\).

Now, we note the actions for various partial cases of generalized scalar–tensor gravity theory:

Considering the gravitational and field equations of the models (1) and (9) in the Friedman universe we can confront them with the choice of natural units, including \( \kappa =8\pi G/c^{4}=1\). Such choice formally means that we could not make difference between non-material and material scalar fields. Thus, the equations will give for us the solutions but these solutions should be considered in the subsequent model. That is, from the physical point of view, the solutions will correspond to different representation of gravity.

Let as note also that the cosmological constant \(\Lambda \) can be extracted from the constant part of the potential \(V(\phi )\), therefore we did not include it into the actions (1) and (9).

*a*(

*t*) is a scale factor, a constant

*k*is the indicator of universe’s type: \( k>0,~k=0,~k<0 \) are associated with closed, spatially flat, open universes, correspondingly.

*t*, \(H \equiv \dot{a}/a\) denotes the Hubble parameter, \(F'_{\varphi } = \partial F/\partial \varphi \) and \(\varphi =\int \sqrt{f(\phi )} d\phi \),

^{1}for \(f(\phi )>0\) we have canonical scalar field \(\varphi \), for \(f(\phi )<0\) we have phantom scalar field \(\varphi \) and for \(f(\phi )=0\) we have a potential motivated inflation. The scalar field equation (13) can be derived from the Eqs. (11)–(12); for this reason, the Eqs. (11)–(12) completely describe the cosmological dynamics and we will deal with the GST gravitational equations only

*GST cosmology*equations.

*GR cosmology*equations.

^{2}

## 3 Conformal connection to GR cosmology

^{3}

Thus we can see, that for transformation from Jordan to Einstein frame we must include Einstein gravitational constant \(\kappa \) into the chiral 1D metric and the potential. So the connection between GST and GR cosmologies have the same view as we stated earlier, namely if we set the natural units, including \(\kappa =1\).

## 4 GST as the source of deviation from de Sitter stage

The de Sitter stage with \(H=const\) where the source of the accelerated (exponential) expansion is the vacuum energy determined by the cosmological constant \(\Lambda \) or a constant scalar field \(\phi =const\) is very important model of accelerated universe.

However, within the framework of the inflationary paradigm, a quasi-de Sitter stage with \(H\approx const\) is considered, implying quantum fluctuations of the scalar field, leading to the formation of a large-scale structure and gravitational waves in GR cosmology [7, 8] and in STG cosmology [30, 31]. Let us note that the first and correct calculation of quantum generation of GW during a metastable quasi-de Sitter stage (later dubbed inflationary) in GR was made in the work by Starobinsky [5], while the first calculation of generation of scalar perturbations in the \(R+R^2 \) inflationary model [1] was performed in [6]. Scalar perturbations in the first viable inflationary model in GR (the so called “new” inflationary one) were later independently calculated in [39, 40, 41].

Suggesting \(F(\phi )\ne 1\), we found the deviation of the scalar field \(\phi =\phi (t)\), the potential \(V(\phi )\) and the kinetic energy \(\dot{\phi }^{2}/2\) from that in GR cosmology at de Sitter stage. Thus, the non-minimal coupling \(F(\phi )\) defines the evolution of a scalar field and the deviation of its potential from the flat one. Also, the non-minimal coupling \(F(\phi )\) can drastically change cosmological dynamics relative to GR cosmology (de Sitter expansion in our consideration). As an example of proposed approach we consider the inflation with power-law Hubble parameter.

## 5 The inflation with power-law Hubble parameter

Further, we shell consider the exact solutions for some classes of inflationary models with exponential power-law dynamics.

### 5.1 The first class of models with \(n=1/3\)

### 5.2 The second class of models with \(n=1\)

### 5.3 The third class of models with \(n=1/2\)

### 5.4 The slow-roll regime

*B*in order to satisfy the conditions \(\epsilon \ll 1\), \(\delta \ll 1\) and \(\xi \ll 1\).

*B*.

## 6 Cosmological perturbations

Further, we shall calculate the parameters of cosmological perturbations to verify the obtained solutions by the observational constraints. The method of calculating the parameters of cosmological perturbations in the case of cosmological models based on scalar–tensor gravity can be found, for example, in [45, 46, 47, 48]. In the slow-roll regime we can use the approach outlined in [45, 46].

*k*is the wave number.

### 6.1 The parameters of cosmological perturbations for ansatz \(H=\lambda \sqrt{F}\)

*H*in the following form

*N*are

## 7 Conclusion and discussions

In this paper we consider the early cosmology with scalar–tensor gravity as the source of deviation from pure de Sitter expansion, i.e. with nonminimal coupling of a constant scalar field, associated with a primary vacuum, and curvature that leads to its evolution.

For the analysis of cosmological models, we chose the specific connection \(H=\lambda \sqrt{F}\) between Hubble parameter and coupling function.

For Hubble parameter \(H(t)=Bt^{n}\), which was considered in all models in this article we get the parameters of cosmological perturbations corresponding to observational constraints and estimate the value of cosmological constant on the crossing of Hubble radius.

Also, we note, that the power spectrum of tensor perturbations is constant for any cosmological model based on the scalar–tensor gravity with \(H=\lambda \sqrt{F}\).

## Footnotes

- 1.
We will use the representation over \(\varphi \) for the sake of brevity. Nevertheless, the representation in terms of \(\phi \) is more convenient, it gives possibility to control crossing of the fantom zone and it’s freedom of choice is helpful under performing the integration.

- 2.
We introduced the terms

*GST cosmology*and*GR cosmology*with the aim to distinguish the gravitational theories background. In both cases we deal with Friedman cosmology because of FRW metric of the spacetime is applied. - 3.
The quantities in Einstein frame we leave without any indices while the quantities in Jordan frame we marked by “J” index.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to S.Yu. Vernov for the discussion and comments on the material of the article at the third International Winter School-Seminar on Gravity, Astrophysics and Cosmology “Petrov School”, 2017, Kazan. I.V. Fomin and S.V. Chervon were supported by RFBR Grant 18-52-45016 IND a. S.V.Chervon is grateful for support by the Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University.

## References

- 1.A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett.
**91B**, 99 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.A.H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D
**23**, 347 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.A.D. Linde, Phys. Lett.
**108B**, 389 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.A. Albrecht, P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**48**, 1220 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.A.A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.
**30**, 682 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar - 6.V.F. Mukhanov, G.V. Chibisov, JETP Lett.
**33**, 532 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar - 7.V.F. Mukhanov, H.A. Feldman, R.H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rep.
**215**, 203 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.A.R. Liddle, D.H. Lyth,
*Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), p. 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.S. Perlmutter et al., Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration. Astrophys. J.
**517**, 565 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.A.G. Riess et al., Supernova Search Team. Astron. J.
**116**, 1009 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.W. Hu, I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D
**76**, 064004 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.S.A. Appleby, A. Stephen, R.A. Battye, Phys. Lett. B
**654**, 7 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.A.A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.
**86**, 157 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D
**70**, 043539 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, TSPU Bull. N
**8**(110), 7 (2011)Google Scholar - 16.S. Capozziello, A.N. Makarenko, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D
**87**(8), 084037 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rep.
**692**, 1 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, C. Skordis, Phys. Rep.
**513**, 1 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.J.D. Barrow, S. Cotsakis, Phys. Lett. B
**214**, 515 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.K.-I. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D
**39**, 3159 (1989)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.H. Motohashi, A.A. Starobinsky, Eur. Phys. J. C.
**77**, 538 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, J. Elliston, R. Tavakol, JCAP
**1108**, 021 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.T.P. Sotiriou, Class. Quantum Gravity
**23**, 5117 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E.F. Bunn, Y. Mao, Phys. Rev. D
**76**, 063505 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano, P. Scudellaro, Astron. Astrophys.
**481**, 279 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano, C. Tortora, Astron. Astrophys.
**454**, 55 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.J.A. Belinchon, T. Harko, M.K. Mak, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D
**07**, 1750073 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.J.A. Belinchon, P. Davila, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.
**14**(07), 1750104 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.J.A. Belinchon, T. Harko, M.K. Mak, Astrophys. Space Sci.
**361**(2), 52 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 30.V. Faraoni,
*Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity (Fundamental Theories of Physics)*(Springer, New York, 2004), p. 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 31.Y. Fujii, K. Maeda,
*The Scalar–Tensor Theory of Gravitation*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), p. 260zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 32.I.V. Fomin, Space, time and fundamental. Interactions
**1**, 31–38 (2018)Google Scholar - 33.I. Fomin, S. Chervon, Mod. Phys. Lett. A
**33**(28), 1850161 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 34.S.V. Chervon, I.V. Fomin, A. Beesham, Eur. Phys. J. C
**78**(4), 301 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 35.I.V. Fomin, S.V. Chervon, Russ. Phys. J.
**60**(3), 427 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 36.H. Motohashi, A.A. Starobinsky, Y. Jokoyama, JCAP
**1509**, 018 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 37.H. Motohashi, A.A. Starobinsky, Europhys. Lett.
**117**, 39001 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 38.S.V. Chervon, Quantum Matter
**2**, 71–82 (2013) (ISSN 2164-7615)Google Scholar - 39.S.W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. B
**115**, 295 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 40.A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B
**117**, 175 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 41.A.H. Guth, S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**49**, 1110 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 42.J.D. Barrow, Phys. Lett. B
**235**, 40 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 43.A.G. Muslimov, Class. Quantum Gravity
**7**, 231 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 44.J.R. Morris, Class. Quantum Gravity
**18**, 2977 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 45.A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, JCAP
**1104**, 029 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 46.A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, J. Elliston, R. Tavakol, JCAP
**1108**, 021 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 47.B. Boisseau, G. Esposito-Farese, D. Polarski, A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**85**, 2236 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 48.A.A. Starobinsky, S. Tsujikawa, J. Yokoyama, Nucl. Phys. B
**610**, 383 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 49.S.V. Chervon, Gen. Rel. Gravity
**36**, 1547 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 50.S.V. Chervon, M. Novello, R. Triay, Grav. Cosmol.
**11**, 329 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar - 51.S.V. Chervon, I.V. Fomin, Gravit. Cosmol.
**14**, 163 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 52.E .O. Pozdeeva, M .A. Skugoreva, A .V. Toporensky, S .Y. Vernov, JCAP
**1612**(12), 006 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 53.P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck Collaboration. Astron. Astrophys.
**594**, A13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Funded by SCOAP^{3}.