# Effects of a string cloud on the criticality and efficiency of AdS black holes as heat engines

## Abstract

We study the black hole thermodynamics in the presence of a string cloud matter distribution, considering a work term due to a variable cosmological “constant” in arbitrary dimensions. Then, we explore the criticality of the system and the behavior of the black hole as a heat engine in the context of general relativity and metric *f*(*R*) gravity.

## 1 Introduction

Since the proof that the area of a black hole never classically decreases, it has been proposed that it can be interpreted as the entropy of a thermodynamic system [1, 2]. In this framework, one can construct a dictionary between gravitational and thermodynamic concepts, e.g, through the relation between mass and the internal energy, surface gravity and the temperature, and the area of the event horizon and the entropy. In the case of the Schwarzschild black hole one cannot naively introduce a work term, but for a more complex black hole such as the Kerr–Newman, work terms can be easily introduced based on the charge and angular momentum of the black hole. One feature of this classic black hole thermodynamics is the lack of the *PdV* mechanical work term. This missing term has been fully reintroduced only in the previous decade, by considering the cosmological constant as a state parameter, and not as a true constant [3].

In this extended framework, the pressure of the system is related to the cosmological constant, and the gravitational mass is no longer identified with the internal energy, but with the enthalpy. In this scenario, there is a possibility of the system to absorb heat and to perform mechanical work, and thus a next natural step would be to study the black hole itself as a heat engine. This idea has been put forward by Johnson for the case of the charged Schwarzschild–Anti de Sitter (AdS) metric [4], and since then several authors have studied other kinds of black holes both in general relativity and in some modified theories of gravity [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. The main purpose of this paper is to give our contribution to the subject, studying how the inclusion of a cosmological cloud of strings, in the background of an asymptotically anti-de Sitter black hole, would affect the correlated thermodynamic system and its configuration as a heat engine.

Another interesting result concerning the introduction of a mechanical work term is the possibility to study phase transitions on the *P*–*V* plane. The first phase transition on the history of black hole thermodynamics has been discovered by Hawking and Page in their seminal paper on the thermodynamics of AdS black holes [23]. With the realization of Maldacena [24, 25] and others that gravitational systems in AdS spacetime admits a gauge duality with thermal fields, it is interesting to look how asymptotically spacetimes can be related to thermodynamic systems. With the introduction of charge in the anti-de Sitter spacetime, Kubiznak and Mann [26] were able to construct an equation of state for the charged AdS black hole analogue to the Van der Waals equation, and to show the existence of several new phase transitions. In this paper we will perform a similar analysis, but using a string cloud background instead of a electromagnetic field, and we will show that in higher dimensions we recover the same Van der Waals equation of state with the same critical parameters.

A cloud of strings (CoS) is the one-dimensional analogous of a cloud of dust and has been introduced, as far as we know, by Letelier [27]. For a radial configuration, its static nature can be maintained by the balance between the internal pull of the gravitational field with the external push of a negative pressure due to the string. Despite the fact that the string cloud has been introduced as a configuration for one-dimensional strings, it resembles some others purely energetic field configurations, such as the global monopole in four dimensions [28]. The advantage to consider a string cloud configuration is that it can be easily extended from four to arbitrary higher dimensional spacetimes. Thus apart from the physical interpretation of a parameter related to the string cloud, one can apply our whole discussion for the global monopole, for the usual fourth-dimensional spacetime.

In this paper we will consider black holes surrounded by a string cloud both in general relativity and in the framework of *f*(*R*) gravity. The latter is today a well-known alternative theory for gravity, that has received a great deal of attention in recent years due to the possibility to explain the current accelerated expansion of the universe by purely geometrical reasons (for reviews, the reader is refereed to [29, 30, 31]). Another reason to study *f*(*R*) theories is that it serves as a toy model for an effective theory of gravity, where we can consider the *f*(*R*) function as a Fourier expansion in the Ricci scalar.

The *P*–*V* criticality of black holes and its realization as heat engines have already been studied in the framework of *f*(*R*) theories [16, 32], but only in the case of a constant Ricci scalar. In this regime, the *f*(*R*) gravity is equivalent to general relativity with a cosmological constant, and the theory lacks of interesting features like higher derivatives in the metric field. In the case of the analogous thermodynamic system, only when we consider a non-constant Ricci scalar we are forced to introduce, as we will see, the non-trivial definition of the thermodynamic volume.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we will briefly introduce the idea of the string cloud and its spacetime metric both in general relativity and in *f*(*R*) gravity. In Sect. 3, we will study the black hole as a thermodynamic system in the extended phase space, i.e., with the *PdV* mechanical work term in general relativity and its realization as a heat engine. In Sect. 4, we will do the same analysis, but in the framework of *f*(*R*) gravity. Finally, in Sect. 5 we will present our conclusions.

## 2 Black hole with a string cloud in f(R) gravity

^{1}In a four dimensional spacetime, it resembles the field of a global monopole, and the effect of the energy–momentum tensor on some background metric is to cause a solid angle deficit. In the case of a higher dimensional spacetime, the effect of the string cloud in the metric is far from trivial, but affects only its radial and time components. The energy–momentum of the string cloud is given by

*d*is the spacetime dimension. All the other components of the energy–momentum tensor are null (for a discussion on the origin of this energy–momentum tensor, please see [27, 33]).

To study the string cloud in *f*(*R*) gravity, in principle, we can choose any functional form for the function *f*(*R*), and try to solve its field equations. In practice, it is generally not possible to find an exact solution for a non-constant Ricci scalar. The most used method to work in *f*(*R*) gravity is to propose a desired solution, in general one that can be analytically written, and then let the equations impose constraints on the *f*(*R*) functional form.

In this paper we will use a *f*(*R*) such that \(df(R)/dR = 1 + \psi _0 r\), where \(\psi _0\) is the parameter that indicates departures from general relativity, and we shall consider \(\psi _0r<<1\). One should notice that this restricts the validity of the metric, but as long as we assume \(\psi _0\) as a small parameter we can still consider high values of *r*. This constraint imposes that our *f*(*R*) theory is a small modification of general relativity. This is not a random guess, but is a constraint imposed by the field equations so that the metric can be found analytically, has a Schwarzschild-like form (\(g_{tt}=-g_{rr}^{-1}\)) and reduces to the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini-AdS metric in the weak-field limit, i.e., as \(\psi _0 \rightarrow 0\) and \(\sigma \rightarrow 0\).

*f*(

*R*) function, a spacetime solution can be found for the static spherically symmetric configuration as some of us derived in [33]. In fact, for the metric

*d*. Using the

*f*(

*R*) field equations

*G*is Newton’s gravitational constant, \(\varOmega _{d-2}\) is the unitary radius for the \(S^{d-2}\)-sphere which will be better defined latter,

*M*is a parameter to be related to the black hole mass, and \(l^2\) is a squared radius related to the negative cosmological constant \(\varLambda \).

Using this solution we can reconstruct the *f*(*R*)-function. In fact, the metric that we found defines a Ricci scalar *R*, which is a function of the radial coordinate \(R=h(r)\). When it is possible to invert this equation as \(r=h^{-1}(R)\), we can use our ansatz to recover the function \(df(R)/dR=1+\psi _0h^{-1}(R)\). Integrating this equation, we are able to recover the original function *f*(*R*) that generated this solution.

*f*(

*R*) function.

*f*(

*R*) gravity, the reader is referred to [33].

In the following section we will study the *P*–*V* criticality and the realization of the black hole as a heat engine in general relativity.

## 3 Black hole thermodynamics in general relativity

In this section we will briefly review the thermodynamics of black holes in general relativity and apply it for the case of a black hole with a string cloud. In the next section, we will extend our study for *f*(*R*) gravity.

*M*, as

*Euclidean trick*, and it can be identified as

*M*and the cosmological constant

*l*were recognized from integration constants when we derived the metric from the field equations. Therefore, the cosmological constant

*l*contributes to the metric as a parameter of the black hole geometry, just as a the mass

*M*. Then it is relevant to consider not just

*M*, but also

*l*as varied when analyzing the black holes mechanics/thermodynamics. A similar role of the cosmological constant was also contemplated in the seminal paper [34] on this subject (see also [35] for the treatment of the cosmological constant as a dynamical field) Allowing

*l*to vary, the differential of the ADM mass can be written as

*V*is the thermodynamic volume of the system and

*P*is its pressure. Let us note that, in the absence of the cosmological constant, one simply obtains \(dM_{adm} = T dS\). Equation (19) allows us to identify the ADM mass with the enthalpy, and, defining the \((d-1)\)-dimensional volume as

*f*(

*R*) gravity. Thus for any process involving the system, isochorics are also adiabatics, a feature that will be explored when we define the cyclic process of our heat engine.

This duality between four and six dimensions is useful for the study of criticality, when considering the ADM mass as the enthalpy of the system, but this would be also the case if we work with the Gibbs free energy \(G(T,P)=H-ST\) and the free energy \(F(T,V)=G-PV\) for finding the critical exponents. However, this is not a perfect duality, since the ADM masses are not equivalent in these distinct cases, which will lead to a distinct behavior of the efficiency of this black hole as a heat engine for the square circle *P*–*V* diagram, as we will see in the next section, in Eq. (34).

We illustrate the \(P-r_+\) diagrams in Figs. 1 and 2 (we set \(\hbar =k_B=G=1\)). As can be seen, there are no critical values for d \(=4\), which implies that the diagram always follow the same behavior, i.e., \(\partial P/\partial r_+\) at constant temperature is always negative. For a van de Waals fluid, \(T_c\) means the temperature above which it is not possible to distinguish liquid and gas phases; for the black hole chemistry the analogy consists in translating liquid/gas to small/large black hole. Therefore, in our case of a string cloud configuration, in \(d=4\), due to the absence of a critical temperature, the thermodynamic behavior is the same for small and large black holes.

*PdV*working term, the reader is refereed to [37].

### 3.1 Heat engines

*fuel*. In this framework it is natural that, after considering black holes as thermodynamic systems, one can consider such system as a heat engine, where the substance used by such engine is defined by its equation of state, given by Eq. (22) in the case of the present paper.

The most natural heat engines are the ones working between two reservoirs of temperature, as sketched in Fig. 3, where \(Q_H\) stands for the amount of heat extracted by the warmer reservoir \(T_1\), and \(Q_C\) is the amount of heat rejected on the colder reservoir \(T_2\). The main function of the engine is to produce some positive work, represented by the letter *W*.

*W*and \(Q_H\) has already been introduced. For the case of black hole heat engines, since isochorics are adiabatics, the Carnot cycle for our static black hole is simpler and can be represented by Fig. 4. One feature of the Carnot engine is that its efficiency depends only on the temperature of the reservoirs, and it is given by

*H*and

*C*stands for

*Hot*and

*Cold*. All other constants are set to be equal unity. The choice criteria was that both the temperatures should be positive, and \(T_H\) greater than \(T_C\). As can be seen in the mentioned figure, the efficiency of the heat engine decreases as the string parameter increases, for dimensions four to six. It is not possible, however, to conjecture that this behavior will be valid for all temperatures, given the relation between temperature, dimension and string parameter.

In Fig. 7, we analyze the efficiency of the cycle depicted in Fig. 5, for the following values: \(\tilde{S}_1 = \tilde{S}_4 = 1, \tilde{P}_1 = \tilde{P}_2 = 4, \tilde{S}_2 = \tilde{S}_3 = 3 \) and \(\tilde{P}_3 = \tilde{P}_4 = 1\). All the other parameters are set to be equal unity, and the choice criteria was that \(M_3 > M_4\) and \(M_2 > M_1\). For this cycle, we found that the efficiency of the engine increases as long as we increase the parameter \(\sigma \). It actually appears that it will be greater than unity for \(\sigma \) larger than 0.25, but this value is the limit for all masses to be positive. Once again, it is not possible to conjecture that the efficiency of the heat engine will be increased for all masses and dimensions, due to a increase of the string cloud parameter \(\sigma \), but we can affirm so at least for a range of parameters.

## 4 Black hole thermodynamics in f(R) gravity

A more detailed account of the thermodynamics of a black hole with a string cloud, in *f*(*R*) gravity, has already been studied in [33]. However, this previous study has been performed in the non-extended phase space, i.e., without a mechanical work term, and by this reason neither a proper definition of pressure nor the *P*–*V* criticality have been studied. We will perform this study in this section.

The extended phase space approach for black hole thermodynamics for a particular example of *f*(*R*) gravity has been recently studied in [16, 32], however these papers only considered the case of a constant Ricci scalar, which relates to the cosmological constant. In our case, we study the effects of modified gravity for a coordinate-dependent contribution coming from the *f*(*R*)-function. As we will see, non-trivial contributions will emerge from our approach, like the need for a redefinition of the thermodynamic volume (an issue that also occurs in other theories of gravity, as can be seen in [36]), and a the need to combine the string cloud and *f*(*R*) parameters, \(\sigma \) and \(\psi _0\) for achieving maximum efficiency of the heat engine.

*f*(

*R*) gravity, the entropy of black holes is modified by a factor proportional to the derivative of the

*f*(

*R*) functional form in respect to the Ricci scalar. Thus, we should modify our previous definition of entropy, Eq. (18), to the following definition

In previous works on *P*–*V* criticality in black holes in *f*(*R*), it has been argued that the pressure should be redefined in the same way as the entropy, i. e., \(P \propto f'(R)\) (see [16, 32]). However, this was possible only because such works deal with the case where the Ricci scalar is a constant. In such case, the volume can be defined as the usual volume \(V_{d-1} \propto r^{d-1}\), and the pressure can be a function only of the parameter *l*. This happens because *f*(*R*) gravity with a constant Ricci scalar is equivalent to general relativity with a cosmological constant. In a general *f*(*R*) theory of gravity, it is not possible to do both choices at the same time, i.e., one must give up to define the thermodynamic volume as the naive volume proportional \(r_+^d\) or to define the pressure as a pure function of the length parameter *l*. This is not an issue only for *f*(*R*) gravity. Even for a Kerr-AdS black hole in general relativity, its thermodynamic volume should be redefined to include its angular momentum (for a deeper discussion, see [36]).

*l*, and not on the horizon radius, since the entropy (that depends only on \(r_+\)) and the pressure are supposed to be independent variables. Thus, the thermodynamic volume should be redefined to include the parameter \(\psi _0\). To do so, we maintain the definition of the pressure as

*f*(

*R*) theory of gravity, it is expected that the thermodynamic volume of a generic

*f*(

*R*) gravity will be modified in relation to is

*naive*definition of volume. Due to this reason, it is no longer a straightforward procedure to find the equations

*P*(

*V*,

*T*) and

*T*(

*S*,

*P*). It is possible, however, to find an equation of state of the form \(P(r_+,T)\), and to use it to study the criticality of the system.

*f*(

*R*) correction as

*f*(

*R*) case, critical quantities do not exist in four dimensions, since in order to exist solutions to the criticality conditions given by Eq. (26), it is mandatory for the pressure to exhibit terms other than \(r_+^{-1}\) and \(r_+^{-2}\). We draw the behavior of the \(P-r_+\) diagram in four dimensions in Fig. 8; where it can be seen that the

*f*(

*R*) correction is highly suppressed by the general relativity contribution. This behavior is found also for arbitrary dimensions.

*f*(

*R*) gravity.

The \(\psi _0\) contribution is suppressed by the other terms in Eq. (42), hence there is no significant difference between the diagrams for *f*(*R*) and general relativity (for instance depicted in Fig. 2 for \(d=7\)). Then we ask the reader to refer to the graphs of Sect. 3 for a qualitative outlook of the pressure behavior in the *f*(*R*) case too. As we will see, this will not be the case for the analysis of the heat engine.

### 4.1 Heat engine

*f*(

*R*) gravity. As we do not have an explicit equation of the form

*T*(

*S*,

*P*), we can calculate the heat capacity at constant volume as

*U*is the internal energy of the system, \(U = H - PV\). After some straightforward algebra, it can be shown that

*T*(

*S*,

*P*). However, for constant pressure, the heat involved in a process is given by the change of enthalpy of the process, i.e., we have that

*f*(

*R*) gravity. We will perform the same analysis as in the case of general relativity, and to study how the efficiency of the heat engine is affected by the introduction of the string cloud, for different values of the parameter \(\psi _0\). We will do this only for the squared cycle, since the temperature in

*f*(

*R*) gravity is corrected only by a constant, thus maintaining the discussion at the same level, i.e., the efficiency of the Carnot cycle for

*f*(

*R*) gravity will not be qualitatively different from the one in general relativity.

*f*(

*R*) gravity can be performed in several forms. As the theory has many free parameters, we will keep our discussion at four dimensions only, and maintain the same parameters we used in general relativity, namely, \(\tilde{S}_1 = \tilde{S}_4 = 1, \tilde{P}_1 = \tilde{P}_2 = 4, \tilde{S}_2 = \tilde{S}_3 = 3 \) and \(\tilde{P}_3 = \tilde{P}_4 = 1\). With this choice, we are left with only two parameters one can modify, the string cloud parameter \(\sigma \) and the

*f*(

*R*) parameter \(\psi _0\).

In Fig. 9, we plot the efficiency of the heat engine as a function of the cloud parameter \(\sigma \), for four different values of the parameter \(\psi _0\), namely, \(\psi _0 = 0, 0.1, 0.5\) and 0.8. As one can see, the efficiency of the heat engine always increase, but not in a trivial manner. To reach a maximum efficiency, one has to choose a proper combination of the parameters \(\sigma \) and \(\psi _0\). In Fig. 10 we show this relation in a different manner. This time, we vary the *f*(*R*) parameter \(\psi _0\) for four choices of the parameter \(\sigma \), namely, \(\sigma = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2\) and 0.3. As one can see, the efficiency increases as the parameter \(\sigma \) increases, but it can increase or decrease as the parameter \(\psi _0\) increases. Once again this plot shows that, to find a maximum efficiency for the heat engine, one must find a proper combination of the parameters \(\sigma \) and \(\psi _0\). This set of parameters can be found, in principle, minimizing the analytic formula for the efficiency as a function of two parameters, but we are interested here only in the qualitative behavior of the theory, and on how the introduction of an *f*(*R*) additional term affects the efficiency.

## 5 Conclusions

In this paper, we study the thermodynamics on the extended phase space of a black hole surrounded by a string cloud, both in general relativity and in the framework of *f*(*R*) gravity. Our focus was to probe the *P*–*V* criticality of the theory and the efficiency of these black holes as heat engines. For both scenarios, we have been able to find the thermodynamic equation of state related to the gravitational system, and to verify if the system presents a phase transition.

For general relativity, we obtained an explicit formula for the equations of state *P*(*V*, *T*) and *T*(*S*, *P*), and we were able to explicitly show that the heat capacity at constant volume is null. This means that one can consider isochorics as isobarics, a well-known feature for several others black holes. In the framework of *f*(*R*) gravity, we have been unable to find an explicit equation of state of the form *T*(*S*, *P*), but we conjecture that \(C_V\) will also vanishes, since the internal energy depends only on the horizon radius, and not on the pressure. For the heat capacity at constant pressure, we have have found an explicit formula for both general relativity and *f*(*R*) gravity.

An interesting result we obtained in the context of general relativity is that the relation between the critical pressure, volume and temperature is the same of the Van der Waals fluid, as long as the dimension of the spacetime is six. For others dimensions, we obtained an analytic formula for such relation. It is important to notice that such formula does not involve the string cloud parameter \(\sigma \). This feature does not happens for *f*(*R*) gravity, where in the relation there is an explicit dependence on the parameter \(\sigma \).

Another interesting result is that we have found, for *f*(*R*) gravity, a non-trivial formula for the thermodynamic volume of the theory, i.e., the conjugate quantity to the pressure. As long as we know, this is the first time a non-trivial thermodynamic volume is found for *f*(*R*) gravity. The existence of non-trivial thermodynamic volumes is well-know in the literature, even for stationary black holes in general relativity, such as the Kerr–Newman spacetime. The meaning of such volumes is not clear until this moment.

Finally, we study the black holes as heat engines and analyzed its efficiency, both for general relativity and for *f*(*R*) gravity. We considered two cycles, the Carnot cycle and a squared cycle in the *P*–*V* plane. The reason to use a squared cycle is that one can find an analytic formula for it, and exploit its properties graphically. We found that the efficiency of the Carnot cycle decreases as we introduce the string cloud, but it is not possible to conjecture that this is an universal behavior, since the temperature has a non trivial dependence on a large set of parameters. This argument is more clear when we move to *f*(*R*) gravity, since it introduces a new parameter which can be varied. For the squared cycle, we showed that the efficiency increases as we increase the parameter \(\sigma \), but the maximum efficiency appears to depend on a combination of both parameters, the one related to the string cloud and the one related to the gravitational theory. In any case, it is important to note that the introduction of a string cloud background will affect the behavior of the black hole as a heat engine.

## Footnotes

- 1.
Its presence inside the event horizon is ambiguous, since in principle it is not possible to define a static string configuration inside of it. In any case, we are interested only in the space-time outside the black hole.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

JPMG and IPL thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES-Brazil), VBB thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-Brazil) and the work of H. Moradpour has been financially supported by Research Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM) under research project no. 1/5440-58.

## References

- 1.J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D
**7**, 2333 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 2.J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter, S.W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys.
**31**, 161 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645742 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 3.D. Kastor, S. Ray, J. Traschen, Enthalpy and the mechanics of AdS black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity
**26**, 195011 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011. arXiv:0904.2765 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 4.C.V. Johnson, Holographic heat engines. Class. Quantum Gravity
**31**, 205002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205002. arXiv:1404.5982 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.B. Eslam Panah, Effects of energy dependent spacetime on geometrical thermodynamics and heat engine of black holes: gravity’s rainbow. arXiv:1805.03014 [hep-th]
- 6.J.X. Mo, S.Q. Lan, Phase transition and heat engine efficiency of phantom AdS black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C
**78**(8), 666 (2018). arXiv:1803.02491 [gr-qc]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.F. Rosso, Holographic heat engines and static black holes: a general efficiency formula. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819500305. arXiv:1801.07425 [hep-th]
- 8.J. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Yu, Accelerating AdS black holes as the holographic heat engines in a benchmarking scheme. Eur. Phys. J. C
**78**(8), 645 (2018). arXiv:1801.06811 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.A. Chakraborty, C.V. Johnson, Benchmarking black hole heat engines, II. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819500068. arXiv:1709.00088 [hep-th]
- 10.S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, Charged AdS black hole heat engines. arXiv:1708.08176 [gr-qc]
- 11.S.H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah, S. Panahiyan, H. Liu, X.-H. Meng, Black holes in massive gravity as heat engines. Phys. Lett. B
**781**, 40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.072. arXiv:1707.02231 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.H. Xu, Y. Sun, L. Zhao, Black hole thermodynamics and heat engines in conformal gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D
**26**(13), 1750151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271817501516. arXiv:1706.06442 [gr-qc]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.H. Liu, X.H. Meng, Effects of dark energy on the efficiency of charged AdS black holes as heat engines. Eur. Phys. J. C
**77**(8), 556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5134-9. arXiv:1704.04363 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.R.A. Hennigar, F. McCarthy, A. Ballon, R.B. Mann, Holographic heat engines: general considerations and rotating black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity
**34**(17), 175005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa7f0f. arXiv:1704.02314 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.A. Chakraborty, C.V. Johnson, Benchmarking black hole heat engines. I. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819500123. arXiv:1612.09272 [hep-th]
- 16.M. Zhang, W.B. Liu, \(f(R)\) black holes as heat engines. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**55**(12), 5136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-3134-4 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 17.C. Bhamidipati, P.K. Yerra, Heat engines for dilatonic Born–Infeld black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C
**77**(8), 534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5076-2. arXiv:1606.03223 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.C.V. Johnson, Born–Infeld AdS black holes as heat engines. Class. Quantum Gravity
**33**(13), 135001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/13/135001. arXiv:1512.01746 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.C.V. Johnson, Gauss–Bonnet black holes and holographic heat engines beyond large \(N\). Class. Quantum Gravity
**33**(21), 215009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/21/215009. arXiv:1511.08782 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 20.M.R. Setare, H. Adami, Polytropic black hole as a heat engine. Gen. Relativ. Gravit.
**47**(11), 133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-015-1979-0 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 21.J. Sadeghi, K. Jafarzade, The thermodynamic efficiency in static and dynamic black holes. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**56**(11), 3387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3501-9. arXiv:1504.07744 [hep-th]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 22.A. Belhaj, M. Chabab, H. El Moumni, K. Masmar, M.B. Sedra, A. Segui, On heat properties of AdS black holes in higher dimensions. JHEP
**1505**, 149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)149. arXiv:1503.07308 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 23.S.W. Hawking, D.N. Page, Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-De Sitter space. Commun. Math. Phys.
**87**, 577 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01208266 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.J.M. Maldacena, The large \(N\) limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**38**, 1113 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026654312961 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 25.J.M. Maldacena, The large \(N\) limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.
**2**, 231 (1998). https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1. arXiv:hep-th/9711200 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 26.D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann, \(P\)–\(V\) criticality of charged AdS black holes. JHEP
**1207**, 033 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)033. arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 27.P.S. Letelier, Clouds of strings in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D
**20**, 1294 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1294 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.M. Barriola, A. Vilenkin, Gravitational field of a global monopole. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**63**, 341 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.341 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.T.P. Sotiriou, V. Faraoni, \(f(R)\) theories of gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**82**, 451 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451. arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 30.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from \(F(R)\) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models. Phys. Rep.
**505**, 59 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.04.001. arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 31.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: inflation, bounce and late-time evolution. Phys. Rep.
**692**, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001. arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 32.S. Chen, X. Liu, C. Liu, J. Jing, \(P\)–\(V\) criticality of AdS black hole in \(f(R)\) gravity. Chin. Phys. Lett.
**30**, 060401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/30/6/060401. arXiv:1301.3234 [gr-qc]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 33.J.P. Morais Graça, I.P. Lobo, I.G. Salako, Cloud of strings in \(f(R)\) gravity. Chin. Phys. C
**42**, 063105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/063105. arXiv:1708.08398 [gr-qc]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 34.C. Teitelboim, The cosmological constant as a thermodynamic black hole parameter. Phys. Lett.
**158B**, 293 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91186-4 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 35.C. Bunster, A. Pérez, Superselection rule for the cosmological constant in three-dimensional spacetime. Phys. Rev. D
**91**, 024029 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024029. arXiv:1412.1492 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 36.D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann, M. Teo, Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda. Class. Quantum Gravity
**34**(6), 063001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa5c69. arXiv:1608.06147 [hep-th]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 37.T.K. Dey, Thermodynamics of AdS Schwarzschild black hole in the presence of external string cloud. arXiv:1711.07008 [hep-th]
- 38.V. Faraoni, Black hole entropy in scalar–tensor and \(f(R)\) gravity: an overview. Entropy
**12**, 1246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/e12051246. arXiv:1005.2327 [gr-qc]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 39.A. Sheykhi, Higher-dimensional charged \(f(R)\) black holes. Phys. Rev. D
**86**, 024013 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.024013. arXiv:1209.2960 [hep-th]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Funded by SCOAP^{3}