Integral measurement of the 12C(n, p)12B reaction up to 10 GeV

Abstract.

The integral measurement of the 12C(n, p)12B reaction was performed at the neutron time-of-flight facility n_TOF at CERN. The total number of 12B nuclei produced per neutron pulse of the n_TOF beam was determined using the activation technique in combination with a time-of-flight technique. The cross section is integrated over the n_TOF neutron energy spectrum from reaction threshold at 13.6MeV to 10GeV. Having been measured up to 1GeV on basis of the 235U(n, f ) reaction, the neutron energy spectrum above 200MeV has been re-evaluated due to the recent extension of the cross section reference for this particular reaction, which is otherwise considered a standard up to 200MeV. The results from the dedicated GEANT4 simulations have been used to evaluate the neutron flux from 1GeV up to 10GeV. The experimental results related to the 12C(n, p)12B reaction are compared with the evaluated cross sections from major libraries and with the predictions of different GEANT4 models, which mostly underestimate the 12B production. On the contrary, a good reproduction of the integral cross section derived from measurements is obtained with TALYS-1.6 calculations, with optimized parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    S. Zinkle, A. Möslang, Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 472 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    M. Rebai, A. Milocco, L. Giacomelli et al., J. Instrum. 8, P10007 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    M. Pillon, M. Angelone, A. Krása et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 640, 185 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    V.E. Ablesimov, E.K. Bonjushkin, A.P. Morosov, in Proceedings of the Neutron Physics Conf., Kiev 1971, Vol. 1 (1971) p. 173

  5. 5

    W.E. Kreger, B.D. Kern, Phys. Rev. 113, 890 (1959)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    E.M. Rimmer, P.S. Fisher, Nucl. Phys. A 108, 567 (1968)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    V.V. Bobyr, G.I. Primenko, K.K. Revyuk et al., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 36, 2621 (1972) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    D.A. Kellogg, Phys. Rev. 90, 224 (1953)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire, M.C. Duijvestijn, in International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France 2007 (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2008) p. 211

  10. 10

    M.B. Chadwick, L.J. Cox, P.G. Young, A.S. Meigooni, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 123, 17 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    M.B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Y. Watanabe, K. Kosako, E.S. Sukhovitskii et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 769, 346 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    http://wwwndc.jaea.go.jp/jendl/jendl.html

  15. 15

    S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    C. Guerrero, A. Tsinganis, E. Berthoumieux et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 27 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    P. Zugec, N. Colonna, D. Bosnar et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 021601(R) (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    C. Paradela, L. Tassan-Got, L. Audouin et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 034601 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    D. Tarrío, L. Tassan-Got, L. Audouin et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 044620 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    https://www-nds.iaea.org/standards/

  21. 21

    M. Barbagallo, C. Guerrero, A. Tsinganis et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 156 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    R. Plag, M. Heil, F. Käppeler et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 496, 425 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    U. Abbondanno, G. Aerts, F. Álvarez et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 538, 692 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    P. Zugec, M. Barbagallo, N. Colonna et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 014605 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    P. Zugec, N. Colonna, D. Bosnar et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 760, 57 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    R.L. Macklin, J. H. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. 159, 1007 (1967)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    U. Abbondanno, G. Aerts, H. Alvarez et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 521, 454 (2004)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    GEANT4, Physics Reference Manual, available online at http://geant4.cern.ch/

  29. 29

    S. Pearlstein, in Symposium on Nuclear Data Evaluation Methodology (Brookhaven National Lab, Upton, NY, 1992)

  30. 30

    G. Battistoni, S. Muraro, P.R. Sala et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 896, 31 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    R.L. Macklin, J. Halperin, R.R. Winters, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 164, 213 (1979)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    S. Lo Meo, M.A. Cortés-Giraldo, C. Massimi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 160 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    A. Koning, S. Hilaire, S. Goriely, TALYS-1.6 User Manual, 2013, http://www.talys.eu/

  35. 35

    A.E. Taylor, E. Wood, Phil. Mag. 44, 95 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    P.H. Bowen, J.P. Scanlon, G.H. Stafford et al., Nucl. Phys. 22, 640 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    J.R. Morales, L.O. Figueroa, P. Martens et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 300, 312 (1991)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    R. Shane, R.J. Charity, J.M. Elson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 614, 468 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    W.P. Abfalterer, F.B. Bateman, F.S. Dietrich et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 044608 (2001)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    V.I. Strizhak, At. Energ. 2, 68 (1957) (in Russian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Ju. G. Degtjarev, At. Energ. 19, 1956 (1965) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    V.T. Shchebolev, Z.A. Ramendik, Sh.V. Yablokov, At. Energ. 39, 207 (1975) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    R.G.P. Voss, R. Wilson, Proc. R. Soc. London A 236, 52 (1956)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    C. Zanelli, P.P. Urone, J.L. Romero et al., Phys. Rev. C 23, 1015 (1981)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    M. Ibaraki, M. Baba, T. Miura et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. Suppl. 2, 405 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    R. Bonetti, A.J. Koning, J.M. Akkermans, P.E. Hodgson, Phys. Rep. 247, 1 (1994)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    D. Mancusi, A. Boudard, J. Cugnon et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 054602 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    S. Pedoux, J. Cugnon, Nucl. Phys. A 866, 16 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Žugec.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Guidal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Žugec, P., Colonna, N., Bosnar, D. et al. Integral measurement of the 12C(n, p)12B reaction up to 10 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16101-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neutron Beam
  • PWHT
  • Reaction Threshold
  • GEANT4 Simulation
  • Neutron Energy Spectrum