Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostics of innovative development of Siberia

  • Regional Development
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper exposes methods for diagnostic of the innovative process of a region. The results of factor, regression, and cluster analyses of the indicators of science and innovations made it possible to detect significant factors for the national and Siberian innovative profiles for 2007 and 2010. For regions of Siberia, the significant factors are investments in human capital and efficiency, investments in technological innovations, and innovative activity. The effect of these factors on the GRP growth in Siberian regions was analyzed for different periods. The coefficients of the equations have been interpreted, positive dependence of the GRP growth on promising investment in science and technological innovations is shown, and recommendations in the field of the innovation policy are given. The cluster analysis has shown that the regions of Siberia can be grouped into three clusters, with Novosibirsk oblast as the innovative leader, and small regions constituting special clusters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kazantsev, S.V., The scale of innovative activities in the subjects of Russian Federation, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2012, no. 4 (76), pp. 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Markov, V.M., Factor analysis of innovative activity in oil-gas sector of Russia, Audit Fin. Analiz, 2010, no. 2, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Markov, L.S. and Yagol’nitser, M.A., Klastery: formalizatsiya vzaimosvyazei v neformalizovannykh proizvodstvennykh strukturakh (Clusters: Formalization of Relationships in Nonformalized Industrial Structures), Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Untura, G.A., Komissarova, I.G., and Ushakov, F.A., Metody obrabotki dannykh dlya postroeniya kompleksnykh (integral’nykh) indikatorov i klassifikatsii ob”ektov (The Methods of Data Analysis for Generation of Complex (Integral) Indicators and Classification of the Objects), Novosibirsk: Novosib. Gos. Univ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Radosevic, S., Science-industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent states: conventional policy wisdom facing reality, Sci. Public Policy, 2011, no. 38 (5), pp. 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kleinknecht, A., Montfort, K., and Brouwer, E., How Consistent are Innovation Indicators? A Factor Analysis of CIS Data: Research Memorandum 2000–2028, Amsterdam: Vrije Univ., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matinez-Pellitero, M., Buesa, M., Heijs, J., and Baumert, T., A novel way of measuring regional systems of innovation: factor analysis as a methodological approach, Instituto de Analysis Industrial y Financiero, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2008. http://eprints.ucm.es/7979/1/60-08.pdf. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Srholec, M. and Verstpagen, B., The voyage of the beagle in innovation system land: explorations on sectors, innovation, heterogeneity, and selection, in TIK Working Paper on Innovation Series 20080220, 2008. http://ideas.repec.org/p/tik/inowpp/20080220.html. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Žížalová, P., Emerging innovation models and regional innovation systems in Czech Republic, in TIK Working Paper on Innovation Studies 20090102, 2009. http://www.sv.uio.no/tik/InnoWP/Zizalova%202009_innovation%20modes%20and%20RIS%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic.pdf. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lavrovskii, B.L., Changes of innovative factor: regional aspect, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2012, no. 4 (76), pp. 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bogachev, Yu.S., Briskin, V.D., Kiselev, V.N., and Oktyabr’skii, A.M., Factor analysis of federal target programs as a tool of innovative development of a state. http://inno.sfedu.ru/node/366. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Logical Framework Methodology: The World Bank Group 2010 Publication. http://tools.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/downloads/project-management/logical-framework-information.pdf. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaneva, M.A., Typology “in-out-results-consequences” and the factors of analysis of innovative potential in Russian Federation, in Issledovaniya molodykh uchenykh: otraslevaya i regional’naya ekonomika, innovatsii, finansy i sotsiologiya (Research Works of the Yong Scientists: Industrial and Regional Economics, Innovations, Finances, and Sociology), Suspitsyn, S.A., Ed., Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, pp. 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A List of the Key Technologies of Russian Federation. http://news.kremlin.ru/ref_notes/988. Cited January 17, 2013.

  15. Kravchenko, N.A., Kuznetsova, S.A., Markova, V.D., et al., Innovatsii i konkurentnosposobnost’ predpriyatii (Innovations and Competitiveness of the Industries), Titov, V.V., Ed., Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010.

  16. Park, H.M., Linear regression models for panel data using SAS, State, LIMDEP, and SPSS, Indiana University Working Paper, The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, 2009. http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath stat/all/panel index.html. Cited January 17, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Untura, G.A., Strategic support of Russian regions: complex assessment of the status of territories of innovations, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2012, no. 1 (73), pp. 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, Russia

    M. A. Kaneva & G. A. Untura

  2. Novosibirsk National Research University, Novosibirsk, Russia

    G. A. Untura

Authors
  1. M. A. Kaneva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. A. Untura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Kaneva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.A. Kaneva, G.A. Untura, 2013, published in Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2013, No. 2(78), pp. 173–196.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaneva, M.A., Untura, G.A. Diagnostics of innovative development of Siberia. Reg. Res. Russ. 4, 105–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970514020075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970514020075

Keywords

Search

Navigation