Advertisement

Arid Ecosystems

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 81–88 | Cite as

Soil resource diversity and its role in food security preservation

Systematic Study of Arid Territories
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

This paper shows the expediency of using the cartographic method for assessing soil resources by area with the addition of resource diversity (production, energy, and information resources). It studies the genetic nature of a production resource, which is an important category of diversity. Ratios are revealed for the values of annual growth and plant litter and the share of total biomass reprocessed into food; the threshold concentration of nutrients and competitive relations in their consumption act as factors of mobilization of unused resources.

Keywords

soil resources annual increase plant litter threshold concentration competition production diversity categories differentiation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asvarova, T.A., Zalibekov, Z.G., and Abdullaeva, A.S., Effect of desertification processes on migration intensity of radionuclides in soils of Terek-Kuma Lowland, Arid Ecosyst., 2013, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biarslanov, A.B., Biological diversity of the general soil types in Dagestan, Tr. Inst. Geol., Dagest. Nauch. Tsentra, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2013, no. 62, pp. 89–92.Google Scholar
  3. Dobrovolsky, G.V., Role of soils in conservation of biological diversity, Pochvovedenie, 1996, no. 6, pp. 694–699.Google Scholar
  4. Dobrovolsky, G.V. and Nikitin, E.D., Sokhranenie pochv kak nezamenimogo komponenta biosfery (Conservation of Soils as the Valuable Component of Biosphere), Moscow: Nauka, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Dokuchaev, V.V., Natural historical classification of Russian soils, in Sochineniya (The Researches), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1950, vol. 4, pp. 255–286.Google Scholar
  6. Fridland, V.M., Pochvennaya karta RSFSR i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv. Masshtab 1: 2500000 (Soil Map of RSFSR and Adjacent Countries, Scale 1: 2500000), Moscow: Glav. Uprav. Geodez. Kartogr. SSSR, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. Grime, J.P., Plant Strategies, Vegetation Process, and Ecosystem Properties, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2001, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  8. Kovda, V.A., Biogeokhimiya pochvennogo pokrova (Biogeochemistry of Soil Cover), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. Kovda, V.A., Biosphere, soils, and their use, in Mater. 10 mezhd. kongr. pochvovedov (Proc. 10 Int. Congr. of Soil Scientists), Moscow: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Kretovich, V.L., Obmen azota v rasteniyakh (Nitrogen Metabolism in the Plants), Moscow: Nauka, 1972.Google Scholar
  11. Mirzoev, E.M.-R., Assessment methods of soil salinity related to salt-resistance of the fruit plantations in the plain part of Dagestan, Pochvovedenie, 1963, no. 12, pp. 63–69.Google Scholar
  12. Ratner, E.I. and Ukhina, S.F., Efficiency of amino acids as the sources for the plant nutrition, Fiziol. Rast., 1963, no. 12, pp. 393–400.Google Scholar
  13. Soldatov, A.S., Soil studies in Dagestan, Tr. Otd. Pochvoved., Dagest. Fil., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1956, vol. 3, pp. 6–22.Google Scholar
  14. Tilman, D., Resource Competition and Community Structure, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. Unchiev, N.D., Biochemical and economic characteristic of fodder plants in winter pastures of Dagestan, Tr. Otd. Rastit. Resur., Dagest. Fil., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, vol. 2, pp. 110–164.Google Scholar
  16. Vernadskii, V.I., About involvement of the living matter in soil formation, in Trudy po biogeokhimii i geokhimii pochv (Research Works on Biogeochemistry and Geochemistry of Soils), Moscow: Nauka, 1992, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
  17. Yarullina, N.A., Pervichnaya biologicheskaya produktivnost’ pochv del’ty Tereka (Primary Biological Productivity of Soils in the Terek River Delta), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Zalibekov, Z.G., Pochvy Dagestana (Soils of Dagestan), Moscow: Nauka, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. Zalibekov, Z.G., Role of analysis of humus composition in creation of the theory of soil behavior in time, Vestn. Dagest. Gos. Univ., Estestv. Nauki, 2013, no. 6, pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
  20. Zalibekov, Z.G., Balamirzoev, M.A., and Biarslanov, A.B., Desertification in Dagestan and implementation of GIS technologies for the control of soil resources, in Pochvennye i rastitel’nye resursy yuzhnykh regionov Rossii i ikh upravlenie s primeneniem GIS-tekhnologii (Soil and Plant Resources of Southern Russia and Their Control Using GIS-Technologies), Makhachkala: Prikasp. Inst. Biol. Resur., Dagest. Nauch. Tsentr, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2007, pp. 19–17.Google Scholar
  21. Zonn, S.V., Soil transformation of Dagestan related to their intensive use, in Biologicheskaya produktivnost’ pochv del’tovykh ekosistem Prikaspiiskoi nizmennosti (Biological Productivity of Soil in Delta Ecosystems of the Caspian Lowland), Makhachkala: Otd. Biol., Dagest. Fil., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1978, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology, Dagestan Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesMakhachkalaRussia
  2. 2.Caspian Institute of Biological Resources, Dagestan Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesMakhachkalaRussia

Personalised recommendations