Advertisement

Comparative analysis of birth defects in regions of nuclear power plant locations

  • N. S. Demikova
  • E. K. Khandogina
  • L. M. Vorobeva
  • N. A. Fedotova
  • B. A. Kobrinskii
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Analysis of birth defect (BD) rates in regions of nuclear power plant locations in comparison with control regions has been performed using the BD monitoring database for 2000–2007. It has been shown that the BD rates in these regions do not differ from BD rates in control regions, for the Russia Federation on the whole and for some other countries. The results indicate that the work of nuclear power plants does not lead to an increase in the BD frequencies in these regions.

Keywords

birth defects monitoring radiation epidemiology 

References

  1. Bochkov, N.P., The Modern View of the Mutation Process in Man, Vestn. Ros. Voen.-Med. Akad., Prilozh. 2, 2008, vol. 36, no. 23, p. 6.Google Scholar
  2. Kobrinskii, B.A. and Demikova, N.S., Principles of Organization of Monitoring of Congenital Malformations and Its Implementation in the Russian Federation, Ros. Vestn. Perinatol. Pediatr., 2001, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 56–60.Google Scholar
  3. Dubinin, N.P., Obschaya genetika (General Genetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Annual Report of International Clearing House for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems, ICBD, Italy, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Dolk, H. and Nichols, R., Evaluation of the Impact of Chernobyl on the Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in 16 Regions of Europe, Int. J. Epidemiol., 2000, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 596–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolk, H., et al., A Review of Environmental Risk Factors for Congenital Anomalies, EUROCAT Special Report, 2004, pp. 89–92.Google Scholar
  7. Neel, J.V. and Schull, W.J., The Effect of Exposure to the Atomic Bombs on Pregnancy Termination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 1956.Google Scholar
  8. Yamazaki, J.N. and Schull, W.J., Perinatal Loss and Neurological Abnormalities Among Children of the Atomic Bomb, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1990, vol. 264, no. 5, pp. 605–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Annual Reports on Monitoring the CDF. www.medmoni-tor.ru.
  10. Annual Report of ICBDSR, 2007, pp. 103–123.Google Scholar
  11. EUROCAT reports. www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. S. Demikova
    • 1
  • E. K. Khandogina
    • 2
  • L. M. Vorobeva
    • 2
  • N. A. Fedotova
    • 2
  • B. A. Kobrinskii
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pediatrics and Child SurgeryRosmedtekhnologii, MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Problems of Safe Development of Nuclear EnergyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations