Advertisement

Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 75–82 | Cite as

Reproductive Strategies of Non-Native Planktonic Crustaceans in the South-Eastern Baltic Sea

  • Ju. Ju. Polunina
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Three nonnative crustacean species have been registered in the zooplankton of the South-Eastern Baltic Sea (SEB). Calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa and cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi have established sustainable self-reproducing populations in the SEB. The successful development of the A. tonsa population is supported by its ability to produce diapausing eggs under unfavorable temperature conditions. The reproductive strategy of C. pengoi in the environmental conditions of the SEB is aimed at increasing the gamogenesis period along with the growing production of the resting eggs. In the SEB environmental conditions, parthenogenesis is the dominant type of reproduction of cladoceran Evadne anonyx.

Keywords

nonindigenous species zooplankton of the Baltic Sea reproduction parthenogenesis gamogenesis number of eggs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acartia tonsa Dana, 1849-a planktonic copepod, in NOBANIS: European Network on Invasive Alien Species, 2013. http://www.nobanis.org/MarineIdkey/Small%20crustaceans/AcartiaTonsa.htm. Accessed February 1, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Aleksandrov, S.V., Zhigalova, N.N., and Zezera, A.S., Long-term dynamics of zooplankton in the southeastern Baltic Sea, Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balushkina, E.V. and Winberg, G.G., The relation between weight and body length in planktonic cristaceans, in Obshchie osnovy izucheniya vodnykh ekosistem (General Principles of Studying Aquatic Ecosystems), Leningrad: Nauka, 1979, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar
  4. Berenbeim, D.Ya., Hydrometeorological description of the Vistula Lagoon, in Ekologicheskie rybokhozyaistvennye issledovaniya v Vislinskom zalive Baltiiskogo moray (Environmental Fishery Research in the Vistula Lagoon of the Baltic Sea Sb. Nauch. Tr. Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., Kaliningrad, 1992, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
  5. Bielecka, L., Mudrak-Cegiouka, S., and Kalarus, M., Evadne anonyx G.O. Sars, 1897—the first record of this Ponto-Caspian cladoceran in the Lagoon of Gdansk (Baltic Sea), Oceanologia, 2014, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Encyclopedia of Life, Acartia tonsa, 2013. http://eol.org/ pages/1020212/details. Accessed February 21, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Gasiünaitë, Z.R., Seasonal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of the plankton crustaceans in the eutrophic coastal lagoon, PhD Thesis, Klaipeda: Klaipeda Univ., 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Glazunova, A., Rodionova, N., and Polunina, Ju., The first record of the Ponto-Caspian cladoceran Evadne anonyx in the Vistula Lagoon, Baltic Sea, Proc. 8th Baltic Sea Science Congress, St. Petersburg, August 22–26, 2011, Abstracts of Papers, St. Petersburg, 2011, p. 295.Google Scholar
  9. Grigorovich, I.A., MacIsaac, H.J., Rivier, I.K., Aladin, N.V., and Panov, V.E., Comparative biology of the predatory cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi from Lake Ontario, Baltic Sea and Caspian Sea, Arch. Hydrobiol., 2000, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holste, L. and Peck, M., The effects of temperature and salinity on egg production and hatching success of Baltic Acartia tonsa (Copepoda: Calanoida): a laboratory investigation, Mar. Biol., 2006, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karaseva, E.M., The first finding of Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) in the open Southeastern Baltic Sea, Nauch. seminar “Vidy-vselentsy v evropeiskikh moryakh Rossii,” Tezisy dokladov (Scientific Workshop “Invador Species in the European Seas of Russia,” Abstracts of Papers), Murmansk, 2000, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
  12. Krylov, P.I. and Panov, V.E., Resting eggs in the life cycle of Cercopagis pengoi, a recent invader of the Baltic Sea, Arch. Hydrobiol., Spec. Iss. Adv. Limnol., 1998, vol. 52, pp. 383–392.Google Scholar
  13. Litvinchuk, L.F. and Telesh, I.V., Distribution, population structure and ecosystem effects of the invader Cercopagis pengoi (Polyphemoidea, Cladocera) in the Gulf of Finland and the open Baltic Sea, Oceanology (Engl. Transl.), 2006, vol. 48, suppl., pp. 243–257.Google Scholar
  14. Manuilova, E.F., Vetvistousye rachki (Cladocera) fauny SSSR (Cladocerans (Cladocera) in Fauna of the USSR), Moscow: Nauka, 1964.Google Scholar
  15. Mauchline, J., The Biology of Calanoid Copepods, San Diego: Elsevier, 1998. http://books.google.co.uk/books? id=fbsrq6CvYkAC&pg=PA4#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed February 22, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po sboru i obrabotke materialov pri gidrobiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh na presnykh vodoemakh. Zooplankton i ego produktsiya (Guidelines for the Collection and Processing of Materials in Hydrobiological Studies of Freshwater Bodies: Zooplankton and Its Production), Leningrad: Gos. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Ozern. Rechn. Rybn. Khoz., 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Naumenko, E.N., The population dynamics of invasive Acartia tonsa Dana in the Vistula Lagoon of the Baltic Sea, in Vidy-vselentsy v evropeiskikh moryakh Rossii (Invader Species in the European Seas of Russia), Apatity, 2000, pp. 113–121.Google Scholar
  18. Naumenko, E.N. and Polunina, Ju.Ju., Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) (Crustacea, Cladocera): a new invader in the Vistula Lagoon of the Baltic Sea, in Vidyvselentsy v evropeiskikh moryakh Rossii (Invader Species in the European Seas of Russia), Apatity, 2000, pp. 121–129.Google Scholar
  19. Navrotskaya, S.E. and Stont, Zh.I., Regional features of the variability of hydrometeorological conditions of the South-Eastern Baltic coast (Kaliningrad oblast), Izv. Russ. Geogr. Ob-va, 2014, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 54–64.Google Scholar
  20. Pöllupüü, M., Simm, M., Pöllumäe, A., and Ojaveer, H., Successful establishment of the Ponto-Caspian alien cladoceran Evadne anonyx G.O. Sars 1897 in low-salinity environment in the Baltic Sea, J. Plankton Res., 2008, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polunina, Ju.Ju., Populations of two predatory cladocerans in the Vistula Lagoon—the native Leptodora kindtii and the non-indigenous Cercopagis pengoi, Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud., 2005, vol. 34, suppl. 1, pp. 249–260.Google Scholar
  22. Polunina, Ju.Ju., Community of cladocerans (Crustacea, Cladocera) in specific conditions of an estuary (a case study of the Pregolya River—Vistula Lagoon system), Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Kaliningrad: Ross. Gos. Univ., 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Polunina, Ju.Ju., Predatory cladocerans (Crustacea, Cladocera) of Curonian and Vistula lagoons of the Baltic Sea, Mater. Vseros. konf. s mezhd. uchastiem “Vodnye i nazemnye ekosistemy: problemy i perspektivy issledovanii,” Vologda, 24–28 noyabrya, 2008 (Proc. All-Russia Conf. with Int. Participation “Aquatic and Overland Ecosystems: Problems and Perspectives of Researchers,” Vologda, November 24–28, 2008), Vologda, 2008, pp. 212–214.Google Scholar
  24. Polunina, Ju.Ju., Reproductive strategy of the alien Ponto-Caspian cladocerans Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) in the Baltic Sea (by example of the Vistula Lagoon), Russ. J. Dev. Biol., 2014, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Recommendations on Methods for Marine Biological Studies in the Baltic Sea: Mesozooplankton Biomass Assessment, Hernroth, L., Ed., Bergen: Inst. Mar. Res., 1985.Google Scholar
  26. Redeke, H.C., On the occurrence of two pelagic copepods, Acartia bifilosa and Acartia tonsa in brackish waters of the Netherlands, J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer., 1934a, vol. 9, pp. 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Redeke, H.C., Acartia (Acanthacartia) Tonsa Dana Ein Neuer Copepode Des Niederländischen Brackwassers, Arch. Neerl. Zool., 1934b, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Review of the Ecological Monitoring of “Kravtsovskoe” (D-6) Offshore Oilfield, 2008. http://www.lukoil.ru/FileSystem/ PressCenter/155737.pdf. Assessed February 21, 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Riv’er, I.K., Reproduction of cercopagids (Cladocera, Polyphemidae) in the Caspian Sea, Tr. Inst. Biol. Vnutr. Vod, Akad. Nauk USSR, 1969, vol. 19, no. 22, pp. 119–128.Google Scholar
  30. Riv’er, I.K., Disturbance and features of embryogenesis in some Cladocera, Inf. Byul. Inst. Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 1974, no. 22, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
  31. Riv’er, I.K., Reproductive biology of plankton crustaceans of the family Cercopagidae (Polyphemoidae, Cladocera), Zool. Zh., 2004, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 776–787.Google Scholar
  32. Rodionova, N.V. and Panov, V.E., Establishment of the Ponto-Caspian predatory cladoceran Evadne anonyx in the eastern Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea, Aquat. Invasions, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rozanska, Z., Zooplankton of the Vistula Lagoon, Zesz. Nauk. Wyzszej Szkoly Roln. Olszt., 1963, vol. 16, no. 278, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
  34. Rzóska, Ju., Materialy do znajomosci plamktonu Malego morza: Copepoda, Arch. Hydrobiol. Ryb., 1939, vol. 12, nos. 1–2, pp. 55–87.Google Scholar
  35. Saiz, E., Tiselius, P., Jonsson, P., Verity, P., and Paffenhofer, G., Experimental records of the effects of food patchiness and predation on egg production of Acartia tonsa, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1993, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Semenova, A.S. and Zhigalova, N.N., Seasonal dynamics and production characteristics of plankton crustaceans of the southeastern part of the Baltic Sea, Mater. mezhd. konf., posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya F.D.Mordukhai-Boltovskogo, “Ekologiya vodnykh bespozvonochnykh,” Borok, 30 oktyabrya—2 noyabrya 2010 (Proc. Int. Conf. Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of F.D. Mordukhai-Boltovsky “Ecology of Aquatic Invertebrates,” Papanin Institute of Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, October 30 to November 2, 2010), Yaroslavl: Printkhaus, 2010, pp. 286–288.Google Scholar
  37. Shchuka, T.A. and Shchuka, S.A., The dynamics of quantitative characteristics of alien species of zooplankton in the south-eastern part of the Baltic Sea in July of the years 2003–2015 in connection with thermohaline conditions, Probl. Ekol. Monit. Model. Ekosist., 2016, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 86–108.Google Scholar
  38. Telesh, I.V., Litvinchuk, L.F., Bol’shagin, P.V., Krylov, P.I., and Panov, V.E., Features of biology of the Ponto-Caspian species Cercopagis pengoi (Crustacea: Onychopoda) in the Baltic Sea, in Vidy-vselentsy v evropeiskikh moryakh Rossii (Invader Species in the European Seas of Russia), Apatity, 2000, pp. 130–151.Google Scholar
  39. Tsyban’, A.V., Volodkovich, Yu.V., Kudryavtsev, V.M., Kudryavtsev, A.V., Shchuka, T.A., and Shchuka, S.A., The status of individual components of plankton ecosystem of the south-eastern Baltic Sea, in Obzor sostoyaniya i zagryazneniya okruzhayushchei sredy v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2012 god (Review of the Status and Environmental Pollution Russian Federation for 2012), Izrael’, Yu.A. et al., Eds., Moscow: Rosgidromet, 2013, pp. 134–138.Google Scholar
  40. Zhigalova, N.N. and Puzhakova, L.I., The status and interannual dynamics of zooplankton development in the waters of the southern part of the Baltic Sea in 1997–2001, in Promyslovo-Biologicheskie Issledovaniya Atlanticheskogo NIRO v 2000–2001 godakh, Tom 2: Baltiiskoe more (Commercial-Biological Scientific Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography in 2000–2001, Vol. 2: The Baltic Sea), Kaliningrad: Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2002, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations