Advertisement

Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 180–187 | Cite as

Composition and species richness of fallow plant communities with predominance of adventive species (Belaya River basin, Western Caucasus)

  • T. G. Eskina
  • V. V. Akatov
  • T. V. Akatova
Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of adventive dominants (Erigeron annuus, Solidago canadensis, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Asclepias syriaca, etc.) on the composition and species richness of fallow plant communities (Belaya River basin, Western Caucasus) are analyzed. The results show that (1) adventive dominants have light effects on the composition of fallow communities; (2) communities with more abundant adventive dominants are characterized by lower community species richness on the plots of 0.5 and 15 m2 as a whole, and a lesser number of native species and higher number of adventive ones; and (3) communities with more abundant adventive dominants are characterized by a lower average frequency of native and adventive species on the plots of 0.5 m2. However, the relations between all these characteristics are poor.

Keywords

adventive species fallow lands dominants species composition species richness frequency Western Caucasus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akatov, V.V., Importance of Local and Regional Process in Species Diversity Formation of Wood Layer in the Western Caucasian Different Size Areas, Issledovano v Rossii, 2010a, no. 40, pp. 479–486. http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2010/040.pdf
  2. Akatov, V.V., Rare and Endangered Plant Species of Russia, Krasnodar Krai and Adygei Republic: Key Factors and Treats by Experts’ Opinion, in XVI Mezhdunar. nauch.prakt. Konf. “Ekologicheskie problemy sovremennosti. Ratsional’noe prirodopol’zovanie i sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya” (The XVI International Scientific-Practical Conference on contemporary Ecological Problems. Rational Nature Management and Preservation of Biodiversity), Maikop: MGTU, 2010b, vol. 3, pp. 105–115.Google Scholar
  3. Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V., and Eskina, T.G., Variation Factors of the Number of Adventive Species in Grass Communities of Western Caucasus, Ekologiya, 2010, no. 5, pp. 344–351.Google Scholar
  4. Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V., and Shadzhe, A.E., Species Diversity of Wood and Shrubby Layers in Riparian Forests of Western Caucasus with Domination of Alien Species, Ekologiya (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R.L. and Peet, R.K., Diversity and Invisibility of Southern Appalachian Plant Communities, Ecology, 2003, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaway, R.M. and Ridenour, W.M., Novel Weapons: A Biochemically Ased Hypothesis for Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability, Frontiers Ecol. Environ., 2004, no. 2, pp. 433–436.Google Scholar
  7. Chernov, Yu.I., Species Diversity and Compensatory Processes in Communities and Biotic Systems, Zool. Zh., 2005, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1221–1238.Google Scholar
  8. Flather, C.H. and Sieg, C.H., Species Rarity: Definition, Causes, and Classification, in Conservation of Rare or Little-Known Species: Biological, Social, and Economic Considerations, Raphael, M.G. and Molina, R., Eds., Washington, 2008, pp. 40–66.Google Scholar
  9. Fridley, J.D., Brown, R.L., and Bruno, J.E., Null Models of Exotic Invasion and Scale-Dependent Patterns of Native and Exotic Species Richness, Ecology, 2004, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 3215–3222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzalez, A. and Loreau, M., The Causes and Consequences of Compensatory Dynamics in Ecological Communities, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 2009, vol. 40, pp. 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hejda, M. and Pyšek, P., What is the Impact of Impatiens glandulifera on Species Diversity of Invaded Riparian Vegetation?, Biological Conservation, 2006, vol. 132, pp. 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., and Jarosik, V., Impact of Invasive Plants on the Species Richness, Diversity and Composition of Invaded Communities, Journal of Ecology, 2009, vol. 97, pp. 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herben, T., Mandak, B., Bimova, K., and Munzbergova, Z., Invasibility and Species Richness of a Community: A Neutral Model and a Survey of Published Data, Ecology, 2004, vol. 85, pp. 3223–3233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houlahan, J.E. and Findlay, C.S., Effect of Invasive Plant Species on Temperate Wetland Plant Diversity, Conservation Biology, 2004, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1132–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hulme, P.E. and Bremner, E.T., Assessing the Impact of Impatiens glandulifera on Riparian Habitats: Partitioning Diversity Components Following Species Removal, Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, vol. 43, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krasnaya kniga Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Rasteniya i griby) (Red Book of Russian Federation), Moscow: Tov. Nauch. Izd. KMK, 2008, 855 p.Google Scholar
  17. Krasnaya kniga RSFSR. Rasteniya (Red Book of RSFSR. The Plants), Moscow: Rosagropromizdat, 1988, 591 p.Google Scholar
  18. Kravtsova, L.S., Izhboldina, L.A., Mekhanikova, I.V., Pomazkina, G.V., and Belykh, O.I., Naturalization of Elodea canadensis Mich. in the Baikal Lake, Ros. Zh. Biol. Invaz., 2010, no. 2, pp. 2–18.Google Scholar
  19. Kunte, K., Competition and Species Diversity: Removal of Dominant Species: Increases Diversity in Costa Rican Butterfly Communities, Oikos, 2008, vol. 117, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKane, R.B., Johnson, L.C., Shaver, G.R., Nadelhoffer, K.J., et al., Resource-Based Niches Provide a Basis for Plant Species Diversity and Dominance in Arctic Tundra, Nature, 2002, vol. 415, pp. 68–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meiners, S.J., Pickett, S.T.A., and Cadenasso, M.L., Effects of Plant Invasions on the Species Richness of Abandoned Agricultural Land, Ecography, 2001, vol. 24, pp. 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mills, J.E., Reinartz, J.A., Meyer, G.A., and Young, E.B., Exotic Shrub Invasion in an Undisturbed Wetland Has Little Community-Level Effect over a 15-Year Period, Biol. Invasions, 2009, vol. 11, pp. 1803–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirkin, B.M. and Naumova, L.G., Nauka o rastitel’nosti (istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie osnovnykh kontseptsii) (The Science of Vegetation (History and Present Status of General Conceptions)), Ufa: Gilem, 1998, 413 p.Google Scholar
  24. Reinhart, K.O., Greene, E., and Callaway, R.M., Effects of Acer platanoides Invasion on Understory Plant Communities and Tree Regeneration in the Rocky Mountains, Ecography, 2005, vol. 28, pp. 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Réjmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., and Pyšek, P., Plant Invasions and Invisibility of Plant Communities, in Vegetation Ecology, van der Maarel, E., Ed., Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, pp. 332–355.Google Scholar
  26. Sagoff, M., Do non-Native Species Threaten the Natural Environment?, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2005, vol. 18, pp. 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sax, D.F., Brown, J.H., White, E., and Gaines, S.D., The Dynamics of Species Invasions: Insights into the Mechanisms that Limit Species Diversity, in Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution and Biogeography, Sax, D.F. and Sunderland, S.D., Eds., Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, 2005, Ch. 17, pp. 447–465.Google Scholar
  28. Sax, D.F. and Gaines, S.D., Species Diversity: From Global Decreases to Local Increases, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2003, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silliman, B.R. and Bertness, M.D., Shoreline Development Drives Invasion of Phragmites australis and the Loss of Plant Diversity on New England Salt Marshes, Conservation Biology, 2004, vol. 18, pp. 1424–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soule, M.E., Community Processes, in Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Soule, M.E., Ed., Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, 1986, pp. 304–308.Google Scholar
  31. Uitteker, R., Soobshchestva i ekosistemy (Communities and Ecosystems), Moscow: Progress, 1980, 327 p.Google Scholar
  32. Vasil’eva, N.V. and Papchenkov, V.G., Influence Mechanisms of Invasive Bidens frondosa L. on Domestic Species of the Bur-Marigold, Ros. Zh. Biol. Invaz., 2011, no. 1, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  33. Vinogradova, Yu.K., Experimental Studies of the Plant Invasions (by an Example of Genus Bidens), in Problemy izucheniya adventivnoi i sinantropnoi flory v regionakh SNG (Problems of Study of Adventive and Synanthropic), Moscow: Botanicheskii Sad MGU, 2003, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
  34. Vinogradova, Yu.K., Invasive Capacity of Natural Phytocenosises and Competitive Relations between Domestic and Invasive Species, in Bioraznoobrazie: problemy i perspektivy sokhraneniya. Materialy konferentsii (Proceedings of the Conference on Biodiversity: Problems and Perspectives of Preservation), Penza, 2008, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caucasian State Nature Biosphere ReserveMaykopRepublic of Adygea, Russia
  2. 2.Maykop State Technological UniversityMaykopRepublic of Adygea, Russia

Personalised recommendations