Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 301–312 | Cite as

Synanthropic and agrophilic rodents as invasive alien mammals



Taxonomic diversity of synanthropic and agrophilic rodents of Russia is analyzed. It is demonstrated that biological features of these mammals are similar. The history and pathways of their invasion, size of invaded area, and role in ecosystems are characterized. It is shown that synanthropic and agrophilic rodents are a part of a number of dangerous invasive alien mammals, but they take different places in the system of alien mammals. Synanthropic and agrophilic rodents are distinct from other alien species of mammals because their harm to natural ecosystems is not very noticeable; however, they cause serious damage to people in built-up areas and agrocoenoses. Agrophyly and synanthropy of rodents developed as an entire process of agro-synantropic population formation at early stages. Urban expansion and extensive plowing led to formation of independent agrophilic and synanthropic populations of rodents. On Russian territory, the house mice combines agrophyly and synanthropy to a greater extent. Expansion of synanthropic and agrophilic animals is connected with maximal transformation of nature by man: town planning and plowing. The global nature of these processes leads to erasure of zonal borders of biodiversity modification.

Key words

invasions alien species synanthropic and agrophilic rodents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bashenina, N. V., Ekologiya obyknovennoi polevki i nekotorye cherty ee geograficheskoi izmenchivosti (Ecology of Common Vole and Some Traits of Its geographic variation), Moscow: Moscow University, 1962 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. Berezhnoi, A. V., Berezhnaya T. V., Grigorievskaya A. Ya., and Dvurechenskii, V. N., Stepped of Central Chernozem Russia: Part, Present, Future, in Voprosy stepevedeniya, (Institute of Steppe, UrO RAS, 2000), pp. 70–78.Google Scholar
  3. Bobrov, V. V., Warshawskii, A. A., and Khlyap, L. A., Chuzherodnye vidy mlekopitayushchikh v ekosistemakh Rossii (Alien Species of Mammals in Ecosystems of Russia), Moscow: KMK, 2008 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. Bobrov, V. V., Warshawskii, A. A., and Khlyap, L. A., AIMS “Àlien Mammal Species” (, revised 25.06.2010.
  5. Bonhomme, F., Annand, R., Darviche, D., Din, W., and Boursot, P., The House Mouse as a Ring Species? In: Genetics in Wild Mouse, Eds. K. Morivaki et al. Tokyo: Japan Sci. Soc. Press, 1994, pp 13–24.Google Scholar
  6. Burdelov, L. A., Chekalin, V. B., Meka-Mechenko, V. G., and Kardasinov, K. K., The Norway Rat (Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout) in Kazakhstan, Izv. Minsiterstva obrazobakiya i hauki RK, NAN RK, Ser. Biol. and Med., Almaty: RIO VAK RK, 1999, no. 4, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
  7. Dgebuadze, Yu. Yu., Ecology of Iinvasions and Populational Contacts of Animals: General Approaches, in: Alien Species in European Seas of Russia, Eds. G. G. Matishov et al., Apatity, 2000, pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrlich, P.R. Attributes of Invaders and Invading Processes: Vertebrates, In: Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, eds. J.A. Drake et al., SCOPE 37, Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore: Wiley J. & Sons, 1989, pp. 315–328.Google Scholar
  9. Erzhanov, N. T., Bespal’ko, G. A., and Dort-Golts, V. A., The Norway rat in Cerntral Kazakhstan, Sibir-Vostok, 2001, no. 10 (46), pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
  10. Formozov A. N., Program and Methods of Work of Observation Stations on Census of Murine Rodents for Prognosis of Their Mass Outbreaks, in: Uchenye zapiski MGU, Biol., 11 (cited after Bashenina, 1962).Google Scholar
  11. A Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species, Eds. J.A. McNeely, H.A. Mooney, L.E. Neville, et al. Switzerland-Cambridge, Gland. UK: IUCN, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 100 of the Word’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database, Ed. S. Lowe, M. Browne, S. Boudjealas, and M. De Poorter, Invasive Species Specialist Group, New Zealand, Auckland, IUCN-ISSG, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. Karaseva, E. V., Telitsyna A. Yu., and Samoilov, B. L., Mlekopitayushchie Moskvy v proshlom I nastoyashchem (Mammals of Moscow in the Past and Present), Moscow: Nauka, 1999 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. Kashchenko, N. F., Rats and Their Substitutes in Western Siberia and Kazakhstan, Ezhegodnik Zool. Muzeya AN, 1912 (1913), vol. 17, pp. 370–390 (cited after Kuzyakin, 1951).Google Scholar
  15. Katalog mlekopitayushchikh SSSR (pliotsen-sovremennost) (Catalog of Mammals of the USSR (Pliosene—Present Time), ed. I. M. Gromov and G. I. Baranova, Leningrad: Nauka, 1981 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. Khlyap L. A., Bobrov V. V., and Warshavsky, A. A. Biological Invasions on the Territory of Russia, Ross. Zh. Biol. Invazii, 2008, no. 2, pp. 67–83 ( 2/Khlyap_08_2.pdf), revosed 25.06.2010. Translation in: Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2010, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–140.
  17. Khlyap L. A., Kucheruk, V. V., Tupikova, N. V., and Warshavsky A. A., Estimation of Biodiversity of Rodents in Settlements, in Animals in the City, Eds. V. V. Rozhnov et al., Moscow, 2000, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
  18. Khlyap L. A., Tupikova N. V., Warshavsky, A. A., and Rozhdestvenskaya I. A., Map of Rodent Population of Russia as a Source of Information on Biodiversity, in: GIS for Sustainable Development of the Territory, Internat. Conf. (Novorossisk), Sevastopol, 2003a, pp. 104–109.Google Scholar
  19. Khlyap, L. A., Warshavsky, A. A., Kucheruk, V. V., and Tupikova, N. V., Rodents of Settlements of Russia and Adjacent Territories (Maps and GIS), in: Animals in the City, Eds. V. V. Rozhnov et al., Moscow: IPEE RAN, 2003, pp.138–140.Google Scholar
  20. Klein, J., Tichy, H., and Figueroa, F., On the Origin of Mice, An. Univ. Chile, 1987, vol. 5, pp. 91–120.Google Scholar
  21. Kotenkova, E. V. Synanthropic and Wiled Mice of the superspecies Complex M. musculus s. l.: Systematics, Distribution, Mode of Life, Isolation Mechanisms, and Evolution, Extended abstract of Doct. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2000, 56 p.Google Scholar
  22. Kozlov, M. P. and Sultanov, G. V., Epidemic Manifestations of Plague in the past and Present, Makhachkala: Dagknigoizdat, 1993 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. Kucheruk V. V., Synanthropic Rodents and their Significance in the Transmission of Infections, in Theoretical Questions of Natural Foci of Diseases, Proceedings of a Symposium held in Prague, November 26–29, 1963, Ed. B. Rosicky and K. Heyberger, Prague, 1965,pp 353–366.Google Scholar
  24. Kucheruk, V. V., Rodents—Inhabitants of Buildings of Man and Settlements in Various Regions of the USSR, in: General and Regional Theriogeography, Ed. A. G. Voronov, Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 165–237.Google Scholar
  25. Kucheruk V. V., Area, in: Seraya krysa: sistematika, ekologiya, regulaytrsiya chislennosti (The Norway rat: Systematics, Ecology, Abundance Control), Eds. V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Moscow: Nauka, 1990, pp. 34–84.Google Scholar
  26. Kucheruk V. V., The Area of Black Rat in the USSR. The European Part and the Caucasus, Byull. Mosc. Ob-va isp. Prir., Biol., 1991, vol. 96,6, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  27. Kucheruk, V. V., The Area of House Mice of te Superspecies Complex Mus musculus s.lato, in: House Mouse: Origin, Distribution, Systematics, Behavior, Eds. E. V. Kotenkova and N. Sh. Bulatova, Moscow: Nauka, 1994, pp. 56–81.Google Scholar
  28. Kucheruk, V. V., Distribution of Black rat in Russia: Siberia and Far East, Byull. Mosc. Ob-va isp. Prir., Biol., 1994a, vol. 99,5, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
  29. Kucheruk, V. V. and Karaseva, E. V., Synathropy of Rodents, in: Synanthropy of Rodents and Control of Their Abundance, Eds. V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Moscow: RAN, 1992, pp. 4–36.Google Scholar
  30. Kulik, I. L., Comparative Analysis of Faunistic Complexes of mammals of the Forest Part of Northern Eurasia, in: Theriologiya, Ed. N. N. Vorontsov, Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1974, vol. 2, pp. 151–162.Google Scholar
  31. Kulik, I. L. Mus musculus Linnaeus, 1758—the House Mouse, in: Medical Theriology, Ed. V. V. Kucheruk, Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 204–218.Google Scholar
  32. Kuzyakin, A. P., History of Expansion, Recent Distribution, and Habitation Sites of the Norway rat in the USSR, in: Fauna and Ecology of Rodents, Ed. A. N. Formozov, Moscow: Mosc. Ob-vo Isp. Prir., 1951, no. 4, pp. 22–81.Google Scholar
  33. Lavrenchneko, L. A., Formation of Recent Area of House Mice. 2.1. Possible Pathways of Evolution and Distribution, in: The House Mouse: Origin, Distribution, Systematics, Bahvior, Eds. E. V. Kotenkova and N. Sh. Bulatova, Moscow: Nauka, 1994, pp. 51–55.Google Scholar
  34. McNeill, W.H., Plagues and Peoples, Garden City, New York: Anchor Press, Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Meshkova, N. N. and Fedorovich, E. Yu., Orientirovochnoissledovatelskaya deyatelnost, podrazhanie i igra kak psikhologicheskie mechanismy adaptatsii vysshykh pozvonocnykh k urbanizirovannoi srede (Orietntational-Explorative Activities, Imitation, and Play as Psychological Mechanisms of Adaptation of Higher Veretabrates to the Urbanized Environment), Moscow: Argus, 1996.Google Scholar
  36. Mironov, N. P., Karpuzidi, K. S., Klimenko, I. Z., et al., Istochniki i perenoschiki chummy i tularemia (Sources and Agents of Plague and Tularemia), Moscow: Meditsina, 1965 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  37. Nikitina, N. A., Mice, in: Results of Marking of Mammals, Ed. V. V. Kucheruk, Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 57–175.Google Scholar
  38. Nikolaev, N. I., Chuma (klinika, diagnostika, lechenie i profilactica) (Plague (Clinics, Diagnostics, Treatment, and Prevention)), Moscow: Meditsina, 1968 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. Neronov, V. M., Khlyap, L. A., Tupikova, N. V., and Warshavsky, Investigation of Formation of Communities of Rodents on Arable Lands of Northern Eurasia, Ekologiya, 2001, no. 5, pp. 355–362 (English translation as: Neronov, V.M., Khlyap, L.A., Tupikova, N.V., and Warshavsky A.A., Formation of Rodent Communities in Arable Lands of Northen Eurasia, Russian Journal of Ecology, vol. 32 (5), 2001, pp. 326–333).Google Scholar
  40. Obyknovennaya polevka: vidy-dvoiniki Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778, M. rossiameridionalis Ognev, 1924 (Common vole: sibling species Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778, M. rossiameridionalis Ognev, 1924), Eds. V. E. Sokolov and N. V. Bashenina, Moscow: Nauka, 1994 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  41. Pavlinov, I. Ya., Sistematika sovremennykh mkekopita-yushchikh (Systematics of Recent Mammals), 2nd ed., Moscow: Moscow University, 2006.Google Scholar
  42. Pavlinov, I. Ya., Kruskop, S. V., Warshavsky, A. A., and Borisenko A. V., Nazemnye zveri Rossii: spravochnik-opredelitel (Terrestrial mammals of Russia: Reference Book and Key), Moscow: KMK, 2002.Google Scholar
  43. Pallas P. S. Zoographia rosso-asiatica, vol. I, Petropoli, 1811 (cited after Kuzyakin, 1951).Google Scholar
  44. Petrov, A. N., The Genus Rattus Fisher von Waldheim, 1803—rats, in: Fauna of the European North-East of Russia. Mammals, vol. II, part I, Insectivora, Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Rodentia, Ed. A. A. Estafiev SPb: Nauka, 1994, pp. 144–154.Google Scholar
  45. Rakitnikov, A. N., Geografiya selskogo khozyaistva: problemy i metody issledovaniya (Geography of Agriculture: Problems and Methods of Investigation), Moscow: Mysl, 1970 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  46. Rossiiskii Dalnii Vostok v drevnosti i srednevekovie: otkrytiya, problemy, gipotezy (Russian Far East in Ancien and Medivia Periods: Discoveries, Problems, Hypotheses), Ed. Zh. V. Andreeva, Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2005 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  47. Saidov, A. S., Gryzuny Yugo-Zapadnogo Tadzhikistana (Rodents of South-West Tajikistan), Dushanbe: Donish, 2010 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  48. Shilov, M. N., Popov, N. V., Warshavsky, S. N., Samarin, E. G., Rechkina, F. F., Tlegenov, T. T., Bravilov, M. A., Pavlov, G. B., and Kiselev, R. N., Expansion of the Area of the Norway Rat in the North Caspian Region and Its Epidemiological Signoficance in Natural Plague Foci, in Ecology and Medical Significance of Norway Rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.), V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Eds. Moscow, 1983, pp. 32–34.Google Scholar
  49. Sokolov V. E. and Karaseva, E. V., The Norway Rat-a Life Form of Synanthropic Rodent, in: Distribution of Ecology of Norway Rat and Methods of Its Abundance Control, V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Eds. Moscow: Nauka,1985, pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
  50. Surkov, V. S., Some Ecological Traits of Norway Rat in Sakhalin and the Southern Kurils, in: The Norway Rat: Ecology and Distribution, Eds. V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Moscow: Nauka, 1986, vol. I, pp. 114–128, S.Peterburg: Nauka, vol. II, 1994, pp. 144–154.Google Scholar
  51. Tesakov, A. S. and Kirillova, I. V., Mice of the Genus Mus in the Middle Pleistocene of the Lower Volga: Synanthropic or Natural Element? In: Theriofauna of Russia and of Adjacent Territories, International Conferecne, January 31–February 2, 2007, Moscow, Ed. V. V. Rozhnov, Moscow: KMK, 2007, p. 491.Google Scholar
  52. Tikhonova G. N., Davydova, L. V., Tikhonov, I. A., and Bogomolov, P. L., Small Mammals of Yaroslavl, Zool. Zh., 2006, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 277–283.Google Scholar
  53. Tikhonova, G. N., Tikhonov, I. A., and Bogomolov, P. L., The Effect a Small City on the Structure of Population of Small Mammals in Forests of North-Eastern Moscow Area, Ekologiya, 2006a, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 277–283.Google Scholar
  54. Tishkov, A. A., Maslyakov, V. Yu., and Tsarevskaya, N. G., Anthropogenic Transformation of Biodiversity in the Process of Unitended Introduction of Organisms (Biogeographic Consequences), Izvestiya RAN, Ser. Geogr., 1955, 4, pp. 74–85.Google Scholar
  55. Tupikova, N. V., Ecology of House Mouse in the Temperate Zone of the USSR, in: The Fauna and Ecology of Rodents, Ed. A. N. Formozov, Moscow: Mosk. Ob-vo ispyt. Prir., 1947, 2, pp. 5–67.Google Scholar
  56. Tupikova, N. V. Attempt at Composition of the Map of Population of Rodents (Rodentia) and Pikas (Ochtona) on the Territory of the Former USSR: Content and principle of Construction of the Legend, Uspekhi sovremennoi biol., 1996, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
  57. Tupikova, N. V., Khlyap, L. A., and Warshavsky, A. A., Rodents of Fields of North-Eastern Palearctic, Zool. Zh., 2000, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 480–494.Google Scholar
  58. Tupikova, N. V., Warshavsky, and A. A. Khlyap, L. A., The Map and Geoinformational System “Population of Rodents and Pikas in the South of the Former USSR”, Arid Ecosystems, 1998a, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
  59. Tupikova, N.V., Warshavsky, A.A., and Khliap, L.A., Population of rodents and pikas of south of the former USSR: mapping and GIS, In Abstracts Euro-American mammal congress (July 19–24 1998), Santiago de Compostella, Spain, 1998b, p. 124.Google Scholar
  60. Ulitin, N. A. and Novikov, V. N., The Norway Rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) in Ashkhabad, Dezinfeksionnoe delo, 2000, no. 2, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
  61. Verpoorte, A., Geagraphic Area of Man of the Recent Type: Dynamics of the Northern Boundary of Man at the Verge from the Pleistocene to the Holocene, in Evolution of Ecosystems of Europe at the Verge from the Pleistocene to the Holocene (24000–8000 years BP), Eds. A, K, Markova and T. Van Kofshoten, Moscow: KMK, 2008, pp. 489–518.Google Scholar
  62. Warshavsky, A. A., Shilov, M. N., Popov, N. V., Survillo, A. V., Kozakevich, V. P., Warshavsky, B. S., Vologin, N. I., Denisov, P. S., Samarin, E. G. Sorokina, Z. S., Shevchenko, V. L., Efimov, V. I., Guvva, L. A., Zuichenko, N. A., and Korzhov, P. N., A Review of Recent Distribution of the Norway Rat in Enzoontic by Plage Regions in the European South-East, the Caucasus, Kazakhstan, and Central Asia and Some Tasks of Further Investigations, in Materials on Ecology and Control Methods of Abundance of the Norway Rat, Eds. V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 32–68.Google Scholar
  63. Warshavsky, A. A., Shilov, M. N., Survillo, A. V., Popov, N. V., Denisov, P. S., Vikulina, A. E., and Pavlov, G. B., Expansion of the Area and Recent State of the Norway rat in the North-West Caspian Plague Focus, in The Norway Rat: Ecology and Distribution, Eds. V. E. Sokolov and E. V. Karaseva, Moscow, 1986, vol. 2, pp. 32–44.Google Scholar
  64. Yakimenko, L. V., Korobitsina, K. V., Frisman, L. V., Morivaki, K., and Yonekawa H., Cytogenetics and Systematics of House mice of Russia and of Adjacent Countries, In Problems of Evolution, A. P. Kryukov and L. V. Yuakimenko, Eds. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2003, vol. 5, pp. 62–89.Google Scholar
  65. Yonekawa, H., Tsuda, K., Tsuchiya, K. Yakimenko, L.V., Korobitsyna, R.V., Chelomina, G.N., Spiridonova, L.N., Frisman, L.V., Krykov, A.P., and Morivaki K., Genetic diversity, geographic distribution and evolutionary relationships of Mus musculus subspecies based on polymorphisms of mitochondrial DNA, In: Problems of Evolution, A. P. Kryukov and L. V. Yuakimenko, Eds. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2003, vol. 5, pp. 90–108.Google Scholar
  66. Zjigarev, I. A., Melkie mlekopitayushchie rekreatsionnykh i estestvennykh lesov Podmoskovya (Small Mammals of Recreational and Natural Forests of Moscow Area), Moscow: Prometei, 2004 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations