On magnetometer heading updates for inertial pedestrian navigation system
A magnetometer is often used to aid heading estimation of a low-cost Inertial Pedestrian Navigation System (IPNS) without which the latter will not be able to accurately estimate heading for more than a few seconds, even with the help of Zero Velocity Update (ZVU). Heading measurements from the magnetometer are typically integrated with gyro heading in an estimation filter such as Kalman Filter (KF) — to best estimate the true IPNS heading, resulting in a better positioning accuracy. However indoors the reliability of these measurements is often questionable because of the magnetic disturbances that can disrupt the measurements. To solve this problem, a filtering method is often used to select the best measurements. However, the importance of the frequency of these measurement updates has not been highlighted.
In this paper, the impact of frequency of magnetometer updates on the overall accuracy of the navigation system is presented. The paper starts by discussing the use of a magnetometer in a low-cost IPNS. An exemplary filter to extract reliable heading measurements from the magnetometer is then described. From real field trial results, it will be shown that even if reliable heading measurements may be obtained indoors, it is still insufficient to increase the positioning accuracy of the low-cost IPNS unless it is reliable on every epoch.
KeywordsKalman Filter Inertial Measurement Unit Significant Position Error Indoor Navigation Earth Magnetic Field
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Skog, I., Nilsson, J.-O., and Händel, P., Evaluation of zero-velocity detectors for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems, Proceedings of International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN 2010), Zurich, Switzerland, 15–17 September 2010.Google Scholar
- 4.Xsens, 2013. [Online] Available at: 〈www.xsens.com〉 [Accessed on 2 October 2013].
- 5.Microstrain, 2013. [Online] Available at: 〈www.microstrain.com〉 [Accessed on 2 October 2013].
- 6.Intersense, 2013. [Online] Available at: 〈www.intersense.com〉 [Accessed on 2 October 2011].
- 9.Glanzer, G. and Walder, U., Self-contained indoor pedestrian navigation by means of human motion analysis and magnetic field mapping, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication (WPNS 2010), Dresden, Germany, 11–12 March 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.Storms, W. F., Raquet, J. F., and Shockley, J. A., 2010. Magnetic Field Navigation in an Indoor Environment. In Proceedings of Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation and Location Based Services (UPIN LBS 2010). Helsinki, Finland, 14–15 October 2010.Google Scholar
- 11.Bird, J. and Arden, D., Indoor navigation with footmounted strapdown inertial navigation and magnetic sensors, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2011, no. 18, pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
- 12.Faulkner, W.T., Alwood, R., Taylor, D.W.A., and Bohlin, J., GPS-denied pedestrian tracking in indoor environments using an IMU and magnetic compass, Proceedings of the 2010 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, California, USA, 25–27 January 2010.Google Scholar
- 14.Sabatini, A.M., Adaptive filtering algorithms enhance the accuray of low-cost inertial/magnetic sensing in pedestrian navigation systems, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2008, no. 7, pp. 351–361.Google Scholar
- 16.Mather, C.J., Groves, P.D., and Carter, M.R., A man motion navigation system using high sensitivity GPS, MEMS IMU and auxiliary sensors, Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2006), Texas, USA, 26–29 September 2006.Google Scholar
- 17.Kemppi, P., Pajunen, J., and Rautiainen, T., Use of artificial magnetic anomalies in indoor pedestrian navigation, Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Ottawa, Canada, 6–9 September 2010.Google Scholar
- 18.Renaudin, V., Afzal, M., and Lachapelle, G., New method for magnetometers based orientation estimation, Proceedings of ION/IEEE PLANS 2010, California, USA, 4–6 May 2010.Google Scholar
- 19.Afzal, M.H., Renaudin, V., and Lachapelle, G., Multimagnetometer based perturbation mitigation for indoor orientation estimation, Navigation, 2011, vol. 58, pp. 279–292.Google Scholar
- 20.Caruso, M., Applications of magnetic sensors for low cost compass systems, Proceedings of Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS 2000), California, USA, 13–16 March 2000.Google Scholar
- 22.Chung, J., Donahoe, M., Schmandt, C., Kim, I. J., Razavai, P., and Wiseman, M., Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, Washington, USA, 28 June–1 July 2011.Google Scholar
- 23.Storms, W. F. and Raquet, J.F., Magnetic field aided indoor navigation, Proceedings of European Navigation Conference (ENC-GNSS 09), Naples, Italy, 3–6 May 2009.Google Scholar
- 24.Afzal, M.H., Renaudin, V., and Lachapelle, G., Assessment of indoor magnetic field anomalies using multiple magnetometers, Proccedings of ION GNSS 2010, Oregon, USA, 21–24 September 2010.Google Scholar
- 26.Kaniewski, P. and Kazubek, J., Integrated system for heading determination, Acta Physica Polonica A, 2010, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 325–330.Google Scholar
- 27.Aponte, J., Meng, X., Hill, C., Moore, T., Burbidge, M., and Dodson, A., Quality assessment of a network-based RTK GPS service in the UK, Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2010, no. 3, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
- 28.Dmitriev, S.P., Stepanov, O.A., Rivkin, B.S., Koshaev, D.A., and Chung, D., Synthesis and analysis of map-matching algorithm for car navigation systems, 55th Annual Meeting on Navigational Technology for the 21st Century, Cambridge, June, 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Bergman, N., Recursive Bayesian estimation. Navigation and tracking applications. Linkoping studies in science and technology, Dissertations No. 579. Department of Electrical Engineering Linkoping University, SE-581-83 Linkoping, Sweden, 1999.Google Scholar
- 30.Stepanov, O.A., and Toropov, A.B., Comparison of point mass and particle filters in map-aided navigation, 17 St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, 2010, pp. 381–384.Google Scholar