Nanofabricated multilayer coatings of Zn-Ni alloy for better corrosion protection

  • V. R. Rao
  • A. Chitharanjan Hegde
Nanoscale and Nanostructured Materials and Coatings


As an effort to increase the corrosion resistance of conventional monolayer Zn-Ni alloy coating, the multilayer Zn-Ni alloy coating have been done electrolytically on mild steel (MS), using gelatin and glycerol as additives. Multilayered, or more correctly composition modulated multilayer alloy (CMMA) coatings have been developed using square current pulse. Successive layers of alloys, in nanometric scale having alternately changing composition were fabricated by making the cathode current to cycle between two values, called cyclic cathode current densities (CCCD’s). The coatings having different configuration, in terms of composition and thicknesses of individual layers were developed and their corrosion performances were evaluated by electrochemical methods. The corrosion rate (CR)’s were found to decrease drastically with progressive increase in number of layers (up to 300 layers), and then increased. The coating configurations have been optimized for best protection against corrosion. The CMMA Zn-Ni coating having 300 layers was found to be about 37 times more corrosion resistant than corresponding monolayer alloy, developed from same bath for same time. High protection efficacy of the coatings were attributed to alternate layers of alloys having different surface structure and composition, supported by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) study, respectively. Optimization procedure has been explained, and results are discussed.


Corrosion Resistance Corrosion Rate Mild Steel Saturate Calomel Electrode Alloy Coating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kalantary, M.R., Wilcox, G.D., and Gabe, D.R., Electrochim. Acta, 1995, vol. 40, no. 11, p. 1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maciej, A., Nawrat, G., Simka, W., and Piotrowski, J., Mat. Chem. Phys., 2012, vol. 132, p. 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blum, W., Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc., 1921, vol. 40, p. 307.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brenner, A., Electrodeposition of Alloys: Principles and Practice, N.Y.: Academic Press, 1963, vol. 2, p. 589.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tench, D. and White, J., Tensile J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, vol. 138, p. 3757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalantary, M.R., Wilcox, G.D., and Gabe, D.R., Br. Corros. J., 1998, vol. 33, p. 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jing-yin Fei and Wilcox, G.D., Surf Coat Tech., 2006, vol. 2000, p. 3533.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fei Jing-yin, Liang Guo-zheng, et al., J. Iron Steel Res., 2006, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahsepar, M. and Bahrololoom, M.E., Corros. Sci., 2009, vol. 51, p. 2537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liao, Y., Gabe, D.R., and Wilcox, G.D., Plat. Surf. Finish., 1998, vol. 85, no. 9, p. 88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirilova, I. and Ivanov, I., J. Appl. Electrochem., 1999, vol. 29, p. 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirilova, I., Ivanov, I., and Rashkov, St., J. Appl. Electrochem., 1998, vol. 28, p. 1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thangaraj, A., et al., Chin. J. Chem., 2008, vol. 26, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatakrishna, K. and Chitharanjan Hegde, A., J. Appl. Electrochem., 2010, vol. 40, p. 2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thangaraj, V., Eliaz, N., and Chitharanjan Hegde, A., J. Appl. Electrochem., 2009, vol. 39, p. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhat Ramesh, et al., Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf., 2011, vol. 47, no. 5, p. 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parthasaradhy, N.V., Practical Electroplating Handbook Simon and Schuster Englewood, New Jersey: Cliffs, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nasser Kanani, Electroplating: Basic Principles Processes and Practice, Berlin: Elsevier Ltd., 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Injetic Gurrappa and Binder, L., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2008, vol. 9, p. 43001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prabhu Ganeshan, et al., Surf. Coat. Technol., 2007, vol. 201, p. 7896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrochemistry Research Laboratory, Department of ChemistryNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkal SrinivasnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations