Boundary element method based on preliminary discretization

Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

A new numerical method for solving wave diffraction problems is given. The method is based on the concept of boundary elements; i.e., the unknown values are the field values on the surface of the scatterer. An analog of a boundary element method rather than a numerical approximation of the initial (continuous) problem is constructed for an approximate statement of the problem on the discrete lattice. Although it reduces the accuracy of the method, it helps to simplify the implementation significantly since the Green functions of the problem are no longer singular. In order to ensure the solution to the diffraction problem is unique (i.e., to suppress fictitious resonances), a new method is constructed similarly to the CFIE approach developed for the classical boundary element method.

Keywords

wave diffraction Helmholtz equation boundary element method boundary algebraic equations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Givoli, “Recent advances in the DtN FE method,” Arch. Comput. Method Eng 6, 71–116 (1999).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.-P. Berenger, “A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves,” J. Comput. Phys. 114, 185–200 (1994).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Harari and T. Hughes, “A cost comparison of boundary element and finite element methods for problems of time-harmonic acoustics,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg 97, 77–102 (1992).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Kleinman and G. Roach, “Boundary integral-equations for 3-dimensional Helmholtz equation,” SIAM Rev. 16, 214–236 (1974).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Burton and G. Miller, “Application of integral equation methods to numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems,” Proc. R. Soc. A 323, 201–210 (1971).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. G. Martinsson and G. J. Rodin, “Boundary algebraic equations for lattice problems,” Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 2489–2503 (2009).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Gillman and P. G. Martinsson, “Fast and accurate numerical methods for solving elliptic difference equations defined on lattices,” J. Comput. Phys. 229, 9026–9041 (2010).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. S. Ryaben’kii, “On the method of difference potentials,” J. Sci. Comput. 28, 467–478 (2006).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Lim, S. V. Utyuzhnikov, Y. W. Lam, A. Turan, M. R. Avis, V. S. Ryaben’kii, and S. V. Tsynkov, “Experimental validation of the active noise control methodology based on difference potentials,” AIAA J. 47, 874–884 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Tsukerman, “A singularity-free boundary equation method for wave scattering,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 59, 555–562 (2011).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. A. Martin, “Discrete scattering theory: Green’s function for a square lattice,” Wave Motion 43, 619–629 (2006).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Poblet-Puig
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Yu. Valyaev
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. V. Shanin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Jordi Girona 1, Campus Nord, B1BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations