Advertisement

Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 227–238 | Cite as

Urban Development Consequences on the Wetland Ecosystems Transformations—Case Study: Pančevački Rit, Serbia

  • Dejan Šabić
  • Snežana Vujadinović
  • Sanja Stojković
  • Snežana Djurdjić
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The article analyzes the consequences of one century long human influences on vegetation of the wetland ecosystem, on the example of Pančevački Rit in Belgrade, Serbia. The autochthonous, non-altered ecosystem was formed in the alluvial plain between Danube and Timis River in the formation of connected swamps and bogs with periodically flooded patches. The major transformation of the wetland ecosystem started with the construction of the embankment and dense canal system followed by settlements development, increasing of population density, intensification of agriculture activities etc. The study area transformation factors were identified in the first phase of research, while the second phase includes analyses of their influences on habitat conversion using GIS, with the purpose to preserve fragments of indigenous wetland vegetation, mostly fragile wetland meadows from further degradation.

Keywords

human activities altered natural conditions wetland vegetation GIS Pančevački Rit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberti, M., Marzluff, J., Shulenberger, J., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., and Zumbrunnen, C., Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems, BioScience, 2003, vol. 53 no. 12, pp. 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, C., Lawrence, R.L., Montagne, C., and Patten, D., Change detection of wetland ecosystems using Landsat imagery and change vector analysis, Wetlands, 2007, vol. 27, pp. 610–619. doi 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[610:CDOWEU]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basic Pedological Map of Serbia, Scale 1: 50000, Sheets Belgrade 1, 2; Obrenovac 2; Zrenjanin 3, Belgrade: Inst. Soil Res., 1963.Google Scholar
  4. Brander, L.M., Florax, R.J.G.M., and Vermaat, J.E., The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature, Environ. Resour. Econ., 2006, vol. 33, pp. 223–250. http://dx.doi.org/. doi 10.1007/sl0640-005-3104-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Čičulić-Trifunović, M., Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1: 100000, Indjija Sheet, Belgrade: Fed. Geol. Survey, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Cui, B.S. and Yang, Z.F., Establishing an indicator system for ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands I. A theoretical framework, Acta Ecol. Sin., 2002, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1005–1011.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, N.C., How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area, Mar. Freshwater Res., 2014, vol. 65, pp. 936–941. doi 10.1071/MF14173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitrijević, M., Karamata, S., Sikošek, B. and Veselinovic, D., Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1: 100000, Pančevo Sheet, Belgrade: Fed. Geol. Survey, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Dimitrijević, M., Dragić, D., Karamata, S., Petrović, B., Sikošek, B., Šuvački, V., and Veselinović, D., Basic Geological Map of SFRY 1: 100000, Belgrade: Fed. Geol. Survey, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z.-I., Knowler, D.J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J., and Sullivan, C.A., Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 2006, vol. 81, pp. 163–182. http://dx.doi.org/. doi 10.1017/S1464793105006950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ðurđic, S., Stojković, S. and Šabić, D., Nature conservation in urban conditions: a case study from Belgrade, Serbia, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 129–145. WOS 000295583900008Google Scholar
  12. Dyakov, N.R., Spatial distribution of some alien plants across a restricted mountainous area, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 663–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Džigurski, D., Nikolić, Lj., and Ljevnaić-Mašić, B., Vegetation of the Hydrochari–Lemnete and Potametea classes in the Danube–Tisza–Danube hydrosystem (Serbia), Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2016, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrenfeld, J., Evaluating wetlands within an urban context, Ecol. Eng., 2000, vol. 15, pp. 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrenfeld, J., Vegetation of forested wetlands in urban and suburban landscapes in New Jersey, J. Torrey Bot. Soc., 2005, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 262–279. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/20063766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernstson, H., van der Leeuw, S.E., Redman, C.L., Meffert, D.J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., and Elmqvist, T., Urban transitions: On urban resilience and humandominated ecosystems, J. Hum. Environ., 2010, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 531–545. doi 10.1007/sl3280-010-0081-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández, S., Santin, C., Marquínez, J., and Álvarez, M.A., Saltmarsh soil evolution after land reclamation in Atlantic estuaries (Bay of Biscay, North coast of Spain), Geomorphology, 2010, vol. 114, pp. 497–507. http://dx. doi.org/. doi 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finlayson, C.M., Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use, Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 2012, vol. 22, pp. 139–143. doi doi 10.1002/aqc.2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner, R.C., Barchiesi, S., Beltrame, C., Finlayson, C.M., Galewski, T., Harrison, I., Paganini, M., Perennou, C., Pritchard, D.E., Rosenqvist, A., and Walpole, M., State of the world’s wetlands and their services to people: a compilation of recent analyses, in Ramsar Briefing Note No. 7, Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs, J.P., Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation, Conserv. Biol., 2000, vol. 14, pp. 314–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gong, P., Wang, J. and Yu, L., Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 2012, vol. 34, pp. 2607–2654. doi 10.1080/01431161.2012.748992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jovanović, S., Calystegio-Equisetum telmateiae is a new hygrophile ruderal community in Belgrade, Acta Herbol., 1993, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
  23. Jovanović, S., Stojanović, V., Lazarević, P., Jelić, I., Vukojičić, S., and Jakovljević, K., Flora of Belgrade surroundings (Serbia) 150 years after Pančić's monograph— a comparative overview, Bot. Serb., 2014, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 201–207.Google Scholar
  24. Junk, W.J., An, S., Finlayson, C.M., Gopal, B., Květ, J., Mitchell, S.A., Mitsch, W.J., and Robarts, R.D., Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis, Aquat. Sci., 2013, vol. 75, pp. 151–167. http://dx.doi.org/. doi 10.1007/s00027-012-0278-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kingsford, R.T. and Thomas, R.F., Use of satellite image analysis to track wetland loss on the Murrumbidgee River flood plain in arid Australia, 1975–1998, Water Sci. Technol., 2002, vol. 45, pp. 45–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kojić, M., Popović, R. and Karadžić, B., Vascular Plants of Serbia as Habitat Indicators, Belgrade: Inst. Istrazivanja Poljoprivredi, 1997, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar
  27. Lakušić, D., Blaženčić, J., Ranđelović, B., Butorac, B., Vukojičić, S., Zlatković, B., Jovanović, S., Šinžar-Sekulić, J., Žukovec, D., Ćalić, I., and Pavićević, Habitats of Serbia—Handbook with descriptions and basic data, in Habitats of Serbia, The Results of the Project “Harmonization of National Habitats Classification Nomenclature with European Community Standards”, Lakusic, D., Ed., Belgrade: Inst. Bot. Bot. Basta Jevremovac, 2005. http://habitat.bio.bg.ac.rs.Google Scholar
  28. Ma, K.M., Kong, H.M., Guan, W.B., and Fu, B.J., Ecosystem health assessment: methods and directions, Acta Ecol. Sin., 2001, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2106–2116. doi 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.106Google Scholar
  29. Mace, G.M., Norris, K., and Fitter, A.H., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2012, vol. 27, pp. 19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Malinić, V., Urban ecotourism as the concept of optimal development of the landscape of outstanding features Veliko ratno ostrvo, Coll. Pap.–Fac. Geogr. Univ. Belgrade, 2016, vol. 64, pp. 481–516. doi 10.5937/zrgfubl664481mGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, J., Paul, M., and Taulbee, W.K., Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 2005, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-021.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Military Geographical Institute, Topographic Map 1: 50 000— Sheets Beograd 2, Zrenjanin 4, Smederevo 1, Belgrade: Milit. Geogr. Inst., 1989.Google Scholar
  33. Mori, A.S., Lertzman, K.P., and Gustafsson, L., Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology, J. Appl. Ecol., 2017, vol. 54, pp. 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, Law on Nature Protection, Belgrade: Off. Gazette RS, 2009, vol. 36, pp. 76–100.Google Scholar
  35. Nestorović, M., Weed flora of the Pančevački Rit, Contemp. Agric., 2009, vol. 58, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–10. udc 63(497.l)(051)-540.2Google Scholar
  36. Nestorović, M. and Konstantinović, B., Assessment of herbicide efficiency in potato crops, Herbologia, 2014, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–52. doi 10.5644/Herb.l4.1.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Niu, Z.G., Zhang, H.Y., and Wang, X.W., Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008, Chin. Sci. Bull., 2012, vol. 57, pp. 2813–2823. doi 1434-012-5093-3 doi 10.1007/slCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Connell, M.J., Detecting, measuring and reversing changes to wetlands, Wetland Ecol. Manage., 2003, vol. 11, pp. 397–401. doi 10.1023/B:WETL.0000007191.77103.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ouyang, W., Shan, Y., Hao, F., Shi, X., and Wang, X., Accumulated impact assessment of river buffer zone after 30 years of dam disturbance in the Yellow River basin, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 2013, vol. 27, pp. 1069–1079. http://dx.doi.org/. doi 10.1007/s00477-012-0645-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pang, A., Li, C., Wang, X., and Hu, J., Land use/cover change in response to driving forces of Zoige County, China, Procedia Environ. Sci., 2010, vol. 2, pp. 1074–1082. doi 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Puzović, S. and Mijović, D., Pančevački Rit, in Cetiri Obale—Živi Svet i Prirodna Baština Sliva Dunava u. Jugoslaviji, Laušević, R., Ed., Belgrade: Drustvo Ekologa Srbije, 1999, pp. 53–56.Google Scholar
  42. Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia, Meteorological Yearbook 2016, Beograd, 2017. http://www.hidmet.gov.rs/ciril/meteorologija/klimatologija_godisnjaci. php.Google Scholar
  43. Šabić, D., Milinčić, M., Pecelj, M., Mandić, D., Pecelj, J., Pavlović, M., Živković, D., and Plavša, J., Geoecological importance of wetlands transformation into agricultural landscape: example of Pančevački Rit in Serbia, Proc. 8th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Environment, Ecosystems and Development, Included in ISI/SCI Web of Science and Web of Knowledge, Athens: World Sci. Eng. Acad. Soc., 2010, pp. 202–205. WOS 000300024800038Google Scholar
  44. Šabić, D., Vujadinović, S., Milinčić, M., Golić, R., Stojković, S., Joksimović, M., Filipovic, D., Šecerov, V., and Dimitrijević, D., The impact of FDI on the transitional economy in Serbia–changes and challenges, Acta Polytech. Hung., 2012, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 65–84. WOS 000306871700004Google Scholar
  45. Šabić, D., Miljković, O., Vujadinović, S., Milinčić, M., and Gajić, M., Geo-ecological transformation of wetland into agricultural landscape: the case of Pančevački Rit, Serbia, J. Environ. Prot. Ecol., 2013a, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 517–523. WOS 000321796500015Google Scholar
  46. Šabić, D., Knežević, A., Vujadinović, S., Golić, R., Milinčić, M., and Joksimović, M., Belgrade Slums—Life or Survival on the Margins of Serbian Society? TRAMES: J. Human. Soc. Sci., 2013b, vol. 17, no. 67, pp. 55–86. WOS 000316314400003Google Scholar
  47. Shengjie, H., Zhenguo, N., Yanfen, C., Lifeng, L., and Haiying, Z., Global wetlands: Potential distribution, wetland loss, and status, Sci. Total Environ., 2017, vol. 586, pp. 319–327. doi 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simeoni, U. and Corbau, C., A review of the Delta Po evolution (Italy) related to climatic changes and human impacts, Geomorphology, 2009, vol. 107, pp. 64–71. doi 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.ll.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soulsbury, C. and White, C.L.P., Human-wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities, Wildl. Res., 2016, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14229#sthash.epto-BIdG.dpuf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Standish, R.J., Hobbs, R.J., and Miller, J.R., Improving city life: options for ecological restoration in urban landscapes and how these might influence interactions between people and nature, Landscape Ecol., 2013, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1213–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Sinecological and Floristic Study of Ruder Vegetation in the Area of Pančevački Rit Belgrade: Poljoprivredni Fak. Beogradu, 2007a, pp. 1–169.Google Scholar
  52. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Taxonomic and ecological analysis of ruder flora in the area of Pančevački Rit, Acta Herbol., 2007b, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  53. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Vrbničanin, S., Radivojević, Lj., and Ivanovic, M., Invasive adventive weed species ruderal and arable area in the Pančevački Rit, Zb. Rezimea XIII Simp. sa Savetovanjem o Zastiti Bilja, Zlatibor, 2007, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
  54. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Radivojević, Lj., Janjić, V., Šantrić, Lj., and Malidža, G., A new association of ruderal weeds at Pančevački Rit in Serbia, Helia, 2008a, vol. 31, pp. 35–44. doi 10.2298/HEL0849035SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Radivojević, Lj., Jovanović, V., Janjić, V., and Šantrić, Lj., Adventive species Asclepias syriaca L. at the area of Pančevački Rit, Acta Herbol., 2008b, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 95–103.Google Scholar
  56. Stanković-Kalezić, R., Jovanović, V., Janjić, V., and Radivojević, Lj., Community Arctio-Artemisetum vulgaris (Tx. 1942) Oberd. et al. 1967: the most represented ruder community in the area of Pančevački Rit, Pesticfitomed., 2009, vol. 24, pp. 113–121.Google Scholar
  57. Stevanović, V., Floristic division of the territory of Serbia with examination of higher horizons and corresponding elements of flora, in Flora Srbije 1, Saric, M., Ed., Belgrade: Serbian Acad. Sci. Arts, 1992, pp. 49–65.Google Scholar
  58. Stevanović, V., Jovanović, S., and Lakušević, D., Diversity of vegetation of Yugoslavia, in Biodiversity of Yugoslavia with an Overview of Species of International Importance, Stevanović, V. and Vasić, V., Eds., Belgrade: Biol. Fak. Beogradu Ecolibri, 1995, pp. 219–241.Google Scholar
  59. Sujing, C., Lijuan, L., Jiuyi, L., and Jiaxu, L., Impacts of climate change and human activities on water suitability in the upper and middle reaches of the Tao’er River area, J. Resour. Ecol., 2016, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 378–385. doi 10.5814/j.issn.l674-764x.2016.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Szmazsenka, E. and Friedlinger, A., Torontál County Map. BIX–Austria-Hungary, BIXa–Political and Administrative Maps, XVI. From the 19th Century to 1918, Prague: Inst. Mus. Milit. Hist., Transp. Group Millennium Comm. Torontál County, 1986.Google Scholar
  61. Tengteng, S., Wenpeng, L., Guangsheng, C., Pupu, G., and Ying, Z., Wetland ecosystem health assessment through integrating remote sensing and inventory data with an assessment model for the Hangzhou Bay, China, Sci. Total Environ., 2016, vols. 566–567, pp. 627–640. doi 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.028Google Scholar
  62. The European Environment Agency, Corine land cover, 2012. http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corineland-cover/clc-2012.Google Scholar
  63. Vidojević, D. and Komnenić, V., Promena biopotencijala ekosistema Pančevački Rita, Zb. Naucn. Rad. Inst. PKB Agroekon., 2004, vol. 10, no. l, pp. 121–128.Google Scholar
  64. Vujadinović, S., Šabić, D., and Gajić, M., Local government in Serbia: between legislation and practice, Coll. Pap.–Fac. Geogr. Univ. Belgrade, 2016, vol. 64, pp. 73–90. doi 10.5937/zrgfubl664073VGoogle Scholar
  65. Vukmirović, D., 2011 Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Serbia—Population, Belgrade: Stat. Off. Rep. Serbia, 2014.Google Scholar
  66. Xiang, S., Guo, R., Wu, N., and Sun, S., Current status and future prospects of Zoige marsh in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Ecol. Eng., 2009, vol. 35, pp. 553–562. doi 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yuanyuan, S., Qingwen, M., Lu, H., and Anthony, F., Agricultural heritage systems: a bridge between urban and rural development, J. Resour. Ecol., 2016, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 187–196. https://doi.org/10.5814/ j.issn.1674-764x.2016.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zedler, J.B. and Kercher, S., Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2004, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zedler, J.B. and Kercher, S., Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability, Rev. Lit. Arts Am., 2005, pp. 39–74. doi 10.146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dejan Šabić
    • 1
  • Snežana Vujadinović
    • 1
  • Sanja Stojković
    • 1
  • Snežana Djurdjić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of GeographyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations