Advertisement

Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 35–41 | Cite as

Estimation of seasonal dynamics of number and age structure of South Baikal natural population of Epischura baicalensis sars using ANOVA

  • E. L. Ermakov
Article

Abstract

The seasonal dynamics of number and age structure of natural population of Epischura baicalensis Sars, 1900 (Copepoda, Calanoida) from South Baikal was studied using the materials of ten-day sampling of zooplankton samples in the water layer of 0–250 min 2001–2004. Using ANOVA we determined the statistical significance of seasonal changes in number and ratio of nauplius larvae, copepodid larvae, and adults. The method of sampling reduction was used to identify the three phases of population cycle: growth, peak, and depression of number, corresponding to three biological seasons. The importance of the obtained data is discussed considering the regulating mechanisms for numbers of population of E. baicalensis

Keywords

lake Baikal zooplankton ANOVA number population 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. M. Gilyarov, Population Ecology (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Begon, J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend, Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1986; Mir, Moscow, 1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Auclair, J. J. Frenette, and J.J. Dodson, “Zooplankton Community Structure in Southwestern Quebec Lakes: the Roles of Acidity and Predation,” Plankton Res. 15(10), 1103 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. E. Cartes and J. C. Sorbe, “Aspects of Population Structure and Feeding Ecology of the Deep-Water Mysid Boreomysis arctica, a Dominant Species in Western Mediterranean Slope Assemblages,” J. Plankton Res. 20(12), 2273 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Valet and J.-C. Dauvin, “Spatio-Temporal Changes of the Near-Bottom Mesozooplankton form the English Channel,” J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 84(3), 539 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. L. Rowlands, M. Dickey-Collas, A. J. Geffen, and R. D. M. Nach, “Abundance Metridia lucens in the Western Irish Sea,” J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 84(3), 617 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Nishibe and T. Ikeda, “Vertical Distribution, Population Structure and Life Cycles of Four Species Oncaeid Copepods in the Oyashio Region, Western Subarctic Pacific,” Mar. Biol. 150(4), 609 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Yu. Naumova, “Life Cycles and Morphology of Representatives of the Genus Epischura Forbes, 1882 (Copepoda: Calanoida),” Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Irkutsk, 2006).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Yu. Maksimenko, T. I. Zemskaya, E. Yu. Naumova, and N. G. Mel’nik, “Analysis of Microbial Community of the Stomach of Baikal Endemic Epischura baicalensis with the Help of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization,” Gidrobiologicheskii Zh. 44(5), 78 (2008).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. M. Kozhova and A. M. Beim, Ecological Monitoring of Lake Baikal (Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, 1993) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. V. Dzyuba, N. G. Mel’nik, and E. Yu. Naumova, “Ranges of Nutrition of the Young of Cottocomephorus inermis (Cottidae) in Lake Baikal,” Voprosy Ikhtiologii 40(3), 21 (2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. R. Izmest’eva, “Zooplankton of Pelagic Zone of South Baikal in the Area of Anthropogenic Load,” in Proceedings of the Conference “Problems of Ecology: Readings in the Memory of Prof. M.M. Kozhov” (Novosibirsk, 1998), pp. 58–60 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. A. Timoshkin, G. F. Mazepova, N. G. Mel’nik, et al., Atlas and Guide to Pelagobionts of Baikal (with Short Sketches on their Ecology) (Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, 1995) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. K. Pavlov and E. V. Pislegina, “Estimation of the State of Population of Epischura baicalensis Sard in Lake Baikal when Conducting Ecological Monitoring,” in Proceedings of the I International Symposium “Baikal. Modern State of the Surface and Underground Hydrosphere of the Mountain Lands” (Novosibirsk, 2004), pp. 120–123 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. L. Afanas’eva, Biology of Epischura baicalensis (Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. M. Kozhova and N. G. Mel’nik, Manual to the Processing of Samples of Plankton by Calculation Method (Irkutsk. Gos. Univ., Irkutsk, 1978) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. G. Mel’nik, “Long-Term Dynamics of Orthonauplii of Epischura baicalensis in Lake Baikal,” in Rhythmics of Natural Phenomena, Proceedings of III All-Union Conference (Leningrad, 1976), pp. 155–156 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. V. Grechanyi, A. Ya. Nikitin, V. M. Korzun, and I. A. Sosunova, Ecological-Genetic Determination of Dynamics of Population Numbers (Irkutsk. Gos. Univ., Irkutsk, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. B. Chernyshev, Ecology of Insects (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. E. Williamson, R. W. Sanders, R. E. Moeller, and S. L. Stutzman, “Utilization of Subsurface Food Resources for Zooplankton Reproduction: Implications for Diel Vertical Migration Theory,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 41(2), 224 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. C. Halliday, S. H. Coombs, and C. Smith, “AComparison of LHPR and OPC Data from Vertical Distribution Sampling of Zooplankton in a Norwegian Fjord,” Sarsia 86, 87 (2001).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. A. Broughton and R. G. Lough, “A Direct Comparison of MOCNESS and Video Plankton Recorded Zooplankton Abundance Estimates: Possible Application for Augmenting Net Sampling with Video System,” Deep-Sea Res, Pt. 2 53(23–24), 2789 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. V. Kozlov, “Pseudoreplication in Ecological Studies: a Problem Unnoticed by the Russian Scientists,” Zh. Obshchei Biologii 64(4), 292 (2003).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. F. Rokitskii, Biological Statistics (Vysheish. Shkola, Minsk, 1973) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Ya. Nikitin and I. A. Sosunova, Analysis and Forecast of Time Series in Ecological Observations and Experiments (Irkutsk. Gos. Pedag. Univ., Irkutsk, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Jung, C. Hojnowski, H. Jenkins, et al., ”Daily Vertical Migrations of Baikal Zooplankton and Their Relation with the Size of Zooplanktonts,” in Materials of the I International Symposium “Baikal. Modern State of the Surface and Underground Hydrosphere of the Mountain Lands” (Novosibirsk, 2004), pp. 131–140 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. P. Tereza, E. V. Dzyuba, E. Yu. Naumova, et al., “Winter Vertical Distribution and Daily Migrations of Zooplankton and Ichtyoplankton in South Baikal,” in Proceedings of the International Conference “Scientific Grounds for Preservation of Water Collecting Basins: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Managing of Natural Resources” (Ulan-Ude; Ulaan-Baatar, 2004), Vol. 1, pp. 187–188 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. V. Grechanyi, E. L. Ermakov, and I. A. Sosunova, “Population Structure of Fruit Fly by the Quantitative Parameters and Its Seasonal Variability,” Zh. Obshchei Biologii 65(1), 39 (2004).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. L. Ermakov, S. I. Pitul’ko, V. M. Korzun, and G. V. Grechanyi, “Genotypic Structure of Natural Population of Water Flea by the Phenotypic Reaction of the Individuals to the Change in Food Amount,” Genetika 46(2), 239 (2010).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. E. Ponyi, I. H. Peter, and N. P. Zankai, “Daily Changes in Population Structure and Production of Eudiapomus gracilis (G. O. Sars) (Copepoda, Calanoida) during Summer in a Shallow Lake (Balaton, Hungary),” J. Plankton Res. 4(4), 913 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    N. G. Mel’nik, “Regularities of Changes in Number of Epischura baicalensis in Lake Baikal, Revealed by the Method of Principal Components,” in Problems of Forecasting Research of Natural Phenomena (Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, 1979), pp. 118–123 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Maynou, M. P. Olivar, and M. Emelianov, “Patchiness and Spatial Structure of the Early Developmental Stages of Clupeiforms in the NW Mediterranean Sea,” J. Plankton Res. 30(3), 873 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    W. M. Lewis, Jr., “Comparison of Temporal and Spatial Variation in the Zooplankton of a Lake by Means of Variance Components,” Ecology 59, 666 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Reis-Santos, S. D. McCormick, and J. M. Wilson, “Iono-Regulatory Changes during Metamorphosis and Salinity Exposure of Juvenile Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus L.),” J. Exp. Biol. 211(10), 978 (2008).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Belmonte and A. C. Pati, “Hatching Rate and Diapause Duration in Eggs of Paracartia latisetosa (Copepoda: Calanoida),” J. Plankton Res. 29(1), 139 (2007).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Bergfur, R. K. Johnson, L. Sandin, et al., ”Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Boreal Streams: Invertebrates, Fungi and Leaf-Litter Breakdown,” Freshwater Biol. 52(10), 1618 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    B. Matthews and A. Mazunder, “Compositional and Interlake Variability of Zooplankton Affect Baseline Stable Isotope Signatures,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 48(5), 1977 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of BiologyIrkutsk State UnversityIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations