Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 156–161 | Cite as

Distribution of total mercury in peat soil profiles in West Siberia

Article

Abstract

Total mercury content in peat soils of different botanical composition has been determined. Mercury content in peat depends on principal properties of peat soil such as botanical composition, ash content, degree of peat decomposition, as well as nitrogen, carbon, and humic acid content in peat. A model based on the mercury/biomass concept is proposed to determine the distribution of total mercury in peat soil profiles in West Siberia from the content of the main biogenic elements C and N.

Key words

mercury peat soil redox potential geochemical barrier biogenic elements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “Estimation of Mercury Distribution and Its Role in Ecosystems,” The Final Report of the ad hoc Research Team of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment 1994–1995 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. F. Vasiliev, A. A. Obolensky, and M. A. Yagolnitser, The Sciences of the Total Environment 213, 73 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Regional and Global Mercury Cycles: Sources, Fluxes, and Mass Balances (NATO ARW, Novosibirsk, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behavior of Mercury and Other Heavy Metals in Ecosystems, Analytical Survey, Issues 1–3 (State Public Scientific Technical Library (GPNTB), Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 1989) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. V. Tauson, V. F. Geletii, and V. I. Men’shikov, Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya 3(1–2), 151 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Biester, R. Kilian, et al., Contribution #1029, in 11th Annual International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment, Ed. by J. Nriagu (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2000) (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. A. Saukov, N. Kh. Aidin’yan, and N. A. Ozerova, Outlines of Geochemistry of Mercury (Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. A. Saukov, “Geochemistry of Mercury,” in Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk (1946) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. P. Gladyshev, S. A. Levitskaya, and L. V. Filippova, Analytical Chemistry of Mercury (Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. M. Varshal and N. S. Buachidze, Zh. Analiticheskoi Khimii 38(12), 2155 (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Meili, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 56, 333 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. A. Golovatskaya, “Elements of Carbon Balance of Biogeocenoses in the System of Oligotrophic and Eutrophic Bogs in the South-Taiga Subzone of the Tomsk Region,” Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology, (Tomsk, 2002).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    RGA-11 Mercury Gas Analyzer, Technical Specification and User’s Guide, AMYa 2.770.001 (Optika Design Bureau, Tomsk, 1990) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Certificate 08-48/034 of Metrological Standardization of an Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Technique for the Quantitative Chemical Analysis of Soils for Microquantities of Mercury [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. T. Bazin, V. D. Kopenkin, V. I. Kosov, et al., Technical Analysis of Peat (Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Ponomareva and T. A. Nikolaeva, Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 88 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. B. Zamyatina, in Agrochemical Methods of Soil Research (Moscow, 1975), pp. 94–95 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. I. Inisheva, T. V. Dement’yeva, E. A. Golovatskaya, and E. V. Porokhina, Vasyugan’e Research Range, Program of a Scientific Excursion (Center of Scientific and Technical Information (TsNTI), Tomsk, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. I. Inisheva, V. I. Yukhlin, and F. F. Zelinger, Determination of Redox Potential of Soils Using an ESK-1 Device (Center of Scientific and Technical Information (TsNTI), Tomsk, 1975), pp. 35–75 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. N. Anoshin, I. N. Malikova, S. I. Kovalev, et al., Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya 3(1–2), 69 (1995).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vasyugan Bog (Environment, Structure, and Functioning) (Center of Scientific and Technical Information (TsNTI), Tomsk, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. I. Perel’man and N. S. Kasimov, Geochemistry of Landscapes: Manual, 3rd ed. (Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. N. Tsybukova and L. I. Inisheva, in Abstracts of the International Symp. on Control and Rehabilitation of the Environment (Tomsk, 1998), pp. 82–83.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. I. Inisheva, V. K. Bernatonis, and T. N. Tsybukova, Torfyanaya Promyshlennost’, No. 1, 19 (1991).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. T. Taisaev, Geochemistry of Frozen Taiga Landscapes and Exploration of Ore Deposits (Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. S. Gladkova and M. S. Malinina, Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 1265 (1999).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. S. Gladkova and M. S. Malinina, Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 960 (2005).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Larcher, Plant Ecology (Springer, New York, 1973; Moscow, 1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations