Advertisement

Polymer Science, Series D

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 156–159 | Cite as

Current prepreg-formation technologies

Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Formation technologies for prepregs intended for items made of glass and carbon fiber are discussed. A comparison of prepreg technologies that are used for manufacturing thermoplastic and thermoreactive binders is given. Advantages of standard prepreg-formation technologies (solution and melt type) and modern sheet molding compounds and bulk molding compounds) are considered.

Keywords

prepregs thermoplastic and thermoreactive binders 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. I. Baurova and V. A. Zorin, Use of Polymer Composite Materials in the Manufacture and Repair of Machines: Textbook (MADI, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Nelyub, A. A. Karaseva, and A. A. Bochenkova, “Construction GRP based on polyester matrix,” VseMater., Entsikl. Sprav., No. 8, 56–58 (2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Nelyub, D. V. Grashchenkov, D. I. Kogan, and I. A. Sokolov, “Use of direct molding techniques in the production of large parts of fiberglass,” Khim. Tekhnol. 13 (12), 735–739 (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. A. Nelyub, A. S. Borodulin, L. P. Kobets, and G. V. Malysheva, “A study of structure formation in a binder depending on the surface microrelief of carbon fiber,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 9 (3), 286–289 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Marycheva, P. P. Maung, and G. V. Malysheva, “Investigation of the influence of structures of tissue materials on the kinetics of the formation of products from fiberglass using vacuum infusion,” Dizain, Mater., Tekhnol., No. 5, 64–66 (2015).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Nelyub and A. A. Berlin, “A study of the chemical structure of the surface of carbon fibers before and after oxidation,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 8 (3), 175–180 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. I. Baurova, V. A. Zorin, and V. M. Prikhod’ko, “Description of scenarios of transition of material from an operable to inoperable state using an equation of fold catastrophe theory,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 8 (1), 1–5 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. I. Baurova, V. A. Zorin, and V. M. Prikhod’ko, “Technological heredity and identification of technological processes,” Vse Mater., Entsikl. Sprav., No. 2, 2–7 (2015).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. V. Malysheva and Y. Y. Shimina, “Influence of preparation technology on carbon-fiber-composite component composition,” Fibre Chem. 46 (4), 237–240 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. S. Borodulin, G. V. Malysheva, and I. K. Romanova, “Optimization of rheological properties of binders used in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding of fiberglass,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 8 (4), 300–303 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Yu. Sergeev and N. I. Baurova, “Studying residual strains in ring-shaped specimens made of polymer composite materials with unidirectional structure,” Klei. Germetiki. Tekhnol., No. 4, 28–32 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Y. Sergeev and N. I. Baurova, “Studying residual strains in ring-shaped specimens made of polymer composite materials with unidirectional structure,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 8 (4), 296–299 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. A. Dement’eva, A. A. Serezhenkov, L. I. Bocharova, N. F. Lukina, K. E. Kutsevich, and A. P. Petrova, “Properties of composite materials based on adhesive prepregs,” Polym. Sci., Ser. D 6 (4), 298–303 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations