Advertisement

Inland Water Biology

, 4:332 | Cite as

Proportion of dead individuals in the zooplankton of the Curonian Lagoon of the Baltic Sea

  • A. S. Semenova
Zooplankton, Zoobenthos, and Zooperiphyton

Abstract

Changes have been studied in space and time in the proportion of dead individuals in the zooplankton of the Curonian Lagoon. Dead individuals were found in the populations of all dominant invertebrate species. Their proportion was shown to increase during “hyperbloom” by a factor of 5 to 6. In the vegetation period without algal hyperbloom (2007), the dead individuals accounted on average for 1.9 ± 0.7% of the total abundance and 1.7 ± 0.8% of the total biomass of zooplankton; in the vegetation period with hyperbloom (2008), their proportion increased to 6.7 ± 3.0% and 5.9 ± 2.5%, respectively. Differences in sensitivity to bloom of Cianobacteria have been revealed in hydrobionts from different groups. Cladocera and nauplial Copepoda are the most sensitive groups; Cyclopoida is the least sensitive. The highest proportion of dead individuals was recorded in the most eutophicated and polluted part of the lagoon. It is suggested that parameters of zooplankton mortality be used for estimating the ecological state of the Curonian Lagoon.

Keywords

Curonian Lagoon bloom of Cianobacteria hyperbloom zooplankton proportion of dead individuals 

References

  1. 1.
    Aleksandrov, S.V., Long-Term Variability of the Trophic Status of the Curonian and Vistula Lagoons of the Baltic Sea, Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 2009, no. 4, pp. 27–34 [Inland Water Biol. (Engl. Transl.), 2009, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 319–326].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleksandrov, S.V. and Dmitrieva, O.A., Primary Production and Characteristics of Phytoplankton as Criteria of Eutrophication of the Curonian Lagoon of the Baltic Sea, Water Resur., 2006, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andronikova, I.N., Strukturno-funktsional’naya organizatsiya zooplanktona ozernykh ekosistem raznykh troficheskikh tipov (Structural-Functional Organization of Zooplankton of Lake Ecosystems of Different Trophic Types), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andronikova, I.N. and Raspopov, I.M., Zones of Environmental Risk in Coastal Areas of Lake Ladoga, Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 2007, no. 2, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belykh, O.I., Gladkikh, A.S., Tikhonova, I.V., and Dmitrieva, O.A., Identification of Genes Involved in the Synthesis of Cyanobacterial Toxins in Different Water Bodies in Russia: Molecular-Biological Approach to Water Quality Assessment, in Tez. dokl. X s”ezda Gidrobiol. Obshch. RAN (Abstr. X Congr. Hydrobiol. Soc. Ros. Akad. Sci.), Vladivostok, 2009, p. 39.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vinberg, G.G., Pervichnaya produktsiya vodoemov (Primary Production of Water Bodies), Minsk: Akad. Nauk BSSR, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vinberg, G.G., Experience of Using Different Systems of Biological Indication of Water Pollution in the USSR, in Vliyanie zagryaznyayushchikh veshchestv na gidrobiontov i ekosistemy vodoemov (Influence of Pollutants on Aquatic Animals and Ecosystems of Water Bodies), Leningrad: Nauka, 1979, pp. 285–289.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gladyshev, M.I., A Device for Staining Zooplankton Organisms to Differentiate Live and Dead Animals in Fixed Samples, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1993, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dmitrieva, O.A., Potentially Toxic Phytoplankton Species of the Russian Part of Curonian and Vistula Bays of the Baltic Sea, in Problemy izucheniya i okhrany prirodnogo i kul’turnogo naslediya natsional’nogo parka “Kurshskaya Kosa” (Problems of Study and Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Kurshskaya Kosa National Park), Kaliningrad, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 102–117.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dmitrieva, O.A., Semenova, A.S., and Chukalova, N.N., Effect of Blooming of Cyanobacteria on the Environmental Situation in the Curonian Lagoon, in Antropogennoe vliyanie na vodnye organizmy i ekosistemy: Mater. III Vseros. Konf. (Proc. III All-Russia Conf. “Anthropogenic Effects on Aquatic Organisms and Ecosystems”), Borok, 2008, pp. 229–233.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Vertical Distribution of Live and Dead Zooplankton Occurring in the Sayan-Shusha Reservoir, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1987, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 84–88.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Estimate of the Number of Dead Zooplanktonic Crustaceans in a Water Body using Aniline Blue Staining of Samples: Methodological Aspects, Zhurn. Sib. Fed. Univ., Ser. Biol., 2008, no. 2, pp. 145–161.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Mortality of Planktonic Crustaceans Not Related to Predators and Its Possible Causes (Overview), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2009, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 168–192.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Gladyshev, M.I., and Gubanov, V.G., Seasonal Dynamics of Live and Dead Zooplankton Specimens in a Small Pond and Some Variants of Estimation of Mortality, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1999, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 543–555.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Gladyshev, M.I., and Makhutova, O.N., Zooplankton Outflow through a High-Pressure Dam and Its Fate in a River with Fast Current (a Case Study of the Dam of the Krasnoyarsk Hydroelectric Power Station on the Yenisei River), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2004, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 81–93.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Semenchenko, V.P., Gladyshev, M.I., et al., Characteristics of Mortality not Related to Predators in Zooplanktonic Cladocerans in the Pelagic and Littoral Zone of a Shallow Slightly Eutrophic Lake, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2007, vol. 416, no. 6, pp. 836–838.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ivanova, M.B. and Telesh, I.V., Assessment of the Environmental State of Neva Bay and Watercourses of St. Petersburg by Zooplankton, Ekologicheskoe sostoyanie vodoemov i vodotokov basseina reki Nevy (Ecological State of Water Bodies and Watercourses of the Neva River), St. Petersburg: Nauch. Tsentr Ros. Akad. Nauk, 1996, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karmaikl, V.V., Chernaenko, V.M., and Evans, I., Cyclic Peptide Hepatotoxins from Freshwater Cyanobacteria (Blue-Green Algae) Collected in Blooming Waters of Ukraine and the European Part of Russia, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1993, vol. 330, no. 5, pp. 659–661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kastal’skaya-Karzinkina, M.A., Method of Determination of Living and Dead Plankton Components in Fixed Material, Tr. Kosinsk. Limnol. St., 1935, vol. 19, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiselev, I.A., Plankton morei i kontinental’nykh vodoemov (Plankton of Seas and Inland Water Bodies), Moscow: Nauka, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiselite, T., Zooplankton of Curonian Bay, Tr. AN LitSSR. Ser. Biol., Vilnus, 1957, vol. 4, pp. 30–34.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozhova, O.M., The Problem of Monitoring Zooplankton, in Monitoring sostoyaniya ozera Baikal (Monitoring of the State of Lake Baikal), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1991, pp. 209–222.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krylova, O.I., Functioning of Plankton and Benthos in Curonian and Vistula Lagoons of the Baltic Sea in Relation to Their Ecological Differences, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1984.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po sboru i obrabotke materialov pri gidrobiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh na presnovodnykh vodoemakh. Zooplankton i ego produktsiya (Methodological Guidelines for Collecting and Processing Materials for Hydrobiological Studies in a Freshwater Environment. Zooplankton and Its Production), Leningrad: Gos. NII Ozer. Rech. Ryb. Khoz., 1984, 33 p.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Naumenko, E.N., Zooplankton in Different Types of Estuaries (using Curonian and Vistula Estuaries as an Example), Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 2009, no. 1, pp. 76–85 [Inland Water Biol. (Engl. Transl.), 2009, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 72–81].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Semenova, A.S., Changes in Zooplankton Characteristics of the Curonian Lagoon during Cyanobacterial Blooming, Voda: Khimiya i Ekologiya, 2009, no. 9, pp. 2–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sergeeva, V.A., Status and Distribution of Zooplankton in Polluted Sites of Ladoga Basin, Sb. Nauch. Tr. Gos. NII Ozer. Rech. Ryb. Khoz., 1988, no. 285, pp. 114–128.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sergeeva, O.A., Kalinichenko, R.A., Lenchina, L.G., and Medyanik, E.V., Effect of the Cooling System of a Thermal Power Plant on Plankton, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1989, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smel’skaya, M.V., Using the Method of Intravital Staining to Assess the Proportion between Living and Dead Animals in the Zooplankton of Lake Galichskoe, in Biology of Inland Waters: Inform. Bull., St. Petersburg, 1995, no. 98, pp. 69–71.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Telesh, I.V., Transformation of Lacustrine Plankton in Rivers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1986, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. 495–498.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    “Tsvetenie” vody (Water Blooming), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1968.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shestakov, V.S., The Role of Cyanobacteria in the Plankton Dynamics of Highly Trophic Lakes, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 1999.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shcherban’, E.P., Experimental Assessment of Toxicity of the Danube River Water for Daphnia magna Straus, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1982, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 82–87.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shcherban’, E.P., Comparative Efficacy of Bioassays Based on Using Different Types of Cladocera, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1992, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 76–81.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shchuka, T.A., Characteristics of the Current State of Zooplankton in the Baltic Sea, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2002.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bickel, S.L., Tang, K.W., and Grossart, H.P., Use of Aniline Blue to Distinguish Live and Dead Crustacean Zooplankton Composition in Freshwaters, Freshwater Biol., 2008, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 971–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dubovskaya, O.P., Gladyshev, M.I., Gubanov, V.G., and Makhutova, O.N., Study of Non-Consumptive Mortality of Crustacean Zooplankton in a Siberian Reservoir Using Staining for Live/Dead Sorting and Sediment Traps, Hydrobiologia, 2003, vol. 504, pp. 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ferrarin, C., Razinkovas, A., and Gulbinskas, S., et al., Hydraulic Regime-Based Zonation Scheme of the Curonian Lagoon, Hydrobiologia, 2008, vol. 611, pp. 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fulton, R.S. and Paerl, H.W., Toxic and Inhibitory Effects of the Blue-Green Alga Microcystis aeruginosa to Herbivorous Zooplankton, J. Plankton Res., 1987, vol. 9, pp. 837–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gladyshev, M.I., Dubovskaya, O.P., Gubanov, V.G., and Makhutova, O.N., Evaluation of Non-Predatory Mortality of Two Daphnia Species in a Siberian Reservoir, J. Plankton Res., 2003, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 999–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Haney, J.F. and Hall, D.J., Sugar-Coated Daphnia: A Preservation Technique for Cladocera, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1973, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lampert, W., Inhibitory and Toxic Effect of Blue-Green Algae on Daphnia, Int. Rev. Gesamt. Hydrobiol., 1981, vol. 66, pp. 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moustaka-Gouni, M., Vardaka, E., Michaloudi, E., et al., Plankton Food Web Structure in a Eutrophic Polymictic Lake with a History of Toxic Cyanobacterial Blooms, Limnol. Oceanogr., 2006, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nizan, S., Dimentman, C., and Shilo, M., Acute Toxic Effects of the Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa on Daphnia magna, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1986, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Olenina, I., Long-Term Changes in the Kursiu Marios Lagoon: Eutrophication and Phytoplankton Response, Ecologija, 1998, no. 1, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Paldaviêiene, A., Mazur-Marzec, H., and Razinkovas, A., Toxic Cyanobacteria Blooms in the Lithuanian Part of the Curonian Lagoon, Oceanologia, 2009, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rohrlack, T., Dittmann, E., Börner, T., and Christoffersen, K., Effects of Cell-Bound Microcystins on Survival and Feeding of Daphnia spp., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2001, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3523–3529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schmidt-Ries, H., Untersuchungen zur Kenntnis des Pelagials Eines Strangewassers (Kurisches Haff), Z. Fisch., 1940, vol. 6, no. 2, 325 p.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Seepersad, B. and Crippen, R.W., Use of Aniline Blue for Distinguishing between Live and Dead Freshwater Zooplankton, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 1978, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1363–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Szidat, L., Beitrage Zur Faunistik und Biologie des Kurischen Haff, in Schr. Physik.-Econom. Gesellschaft zur Koenigsberg i Pr., 1926, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tang, K.W., Freund, C.S., and Schweitzer, C.L., Occurrence of Copepod Carcasses in the Lower Chesapeake Bay and Their Decomposition by Ambient Microbes, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 2006, vol. 68, pp. 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atlantic Research Institute of Fishery and OceanographyKaliningradRussia

Personalised recommendations