Nanotechnologies in Russia

, Volume 7, Issue 1–2, pp 54–61 | Cite as

Distribution of particles in sizes and sintering: A numerical analysis



On the basis of a physical model of sintering, a numerical analysis of the temporal form change in the simulative powder compacts from particles with various distribution widths is carried out. It is shown that, provided the average particle size and initial density of packing are the same, the average grains size in the sintered material and the grains size distribution width both increase with growth of particle-distribution width. The best results from the point of view of productivity of the process (time of sintering) and the qualities of the final product (the average size of the grain) are demonstrated by monodisperse powders. The pro-posed numerical technique may be useful for a qualitative analysis of sintering of the powder compacts, for the reason to optimize the technological parameters and the quality of the material.


Free Boundary Distribution Width Sinter Time Sintered Material Contact Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Deresevich, “Mechanics of a Granular Media,” in Problems of Mechanics (Inostr. Liter., Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Das and H. S. Maiti, “Effect of Size Distribution of the Starting Powders on the Pore Size and its Distribution of Tape Cast Alumina Microporous Membranes,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19, 341 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. L. Coble, “Effects of Particle-Size Distribution in Initial-Stage Sintering,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 56(9), 461 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Wakai, M. Yoshida, and B. P. Kashyap, “Influence of Particle Arrangement on Coarsening during Sintering of Free Spherical Particles,” J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 114(11), 974 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. V. Galakhov, “Pore Coordination Number and Sintering,” Refract. Industr. Ceram. 51, 83–87 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. V. Galakhov and V. Ya. Shevchenko, “Analysis of Two-Dimensional Packing, Refractories 32, 629 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. A. Brebbia, The Boundary Element Method for Engineers (Wiley, New York, 1978; Mir, Moscow, 1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. V. Galakhov, “Numerical Methods of Simulating Sintering,” Refract. Industr. Ceram. 50, 191 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ya. E. Geguzin, Physics of Sintering (Nauka, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. S. Gorelik, S. V. Dobatkin, and L. Kaputkina, Recrystallization of Metals and Alloys (MISIS, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Hirth and J. Lotte, Theory of Dislocations (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967; Atomizdat, Moscow, 1972).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. M. Dynys, R. L. Coble, and W. S. Coblenz, “Mechanisms of Atom Transport during Initial Stage Sintering of Al2O3,” Mat. Sci. Res. 13, 391 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Nicolopoulus, “Surface, Grain-Boundary and Interfacial Energies in Al2O3 and Al2O3-Sn, Al2O3-Co Systems,” J. Mat. Sci. 20, 3993 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. B. Nandiyanto and K. Okuyama, “Progress in Developing Spray-Drying Methods for the Production of Controlled Morphology Particles: From the Nanometer to Submicrometer Size Range,” Adv. Powder Technol. 22, 1 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Galakhov, L. V. Vinogradov, V. I. Antipov, and A. G. Kolmakov, “Nanostructured Powders for Ceramics,” Nanotechnol. Russia 6, 662 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations