Evaluation of cytotoxicity and efficiency of antioxidant protection of hydrophilic derivatives of 2,4,6-trialkylphenols in Escherichia coli cells

  • U. N. Rotskaya
  • L. P. Ovchinnikova
  • E. A. Vasunina
  • O. I. Sinitsina
  • N. V. Kandalintseva
  • E. A. Prosenko
  • G. A. Nevinsky
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of five new derivatives of 2,6-dialkyl-4-propylphenol containing different ionogenic groups (-SO3Na, -S-SO3Na, -S-(NH2)2Cl) in the para position on survival of the E. coli AB1157 strain and its isogenic strain deficient in repair enzyme genes have been investigated in the presence and in the absence of hydrogen peroxide. Survival of cells treated with hydrogen peroxide was markedly increased in the presence of sodium (3-(3,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propyl)-1-sulphonate (C1). Replacement of methyl substituents at ortho-position of C1 for tert-butyl or cyclohexyl groups decreased cell protection against exogenous hydrogen peroxide. Among 2,6-di-tert-buthylphenol the compound with the thiosulphonate group demonstrated properties similar to its sulphonate analog, whereas 3 mM isothiuronium chloride completely suppressed cell growth both in the absence and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Thus, among the tested compounds C1 may be considered as the most promising antioxidant.

Keywords

oxidative stress sulfur-containing phenolic antioxidants hydrophilic antioxidants 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols 

Abbreviations used

AO

antioxidant

CFU

colony forming unit

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sies, H., Oxidative Stress, London: Academic Press, 1985, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sies, H., Amer. J. Med., 1991, vol. 91, pp. 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seyfulla, R.D. and Borisova, I.G., Farmakol. Toksikol., 1990, no. 6, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Men’schikova, E.B., Lankin, V.Z. Zenkov, N.K., Bondar’, I.A., Krugovykh, I.F., and Trufakin, V.A., Okislitel’nyi stress. Prooksidanty i antioksidanty (Oxidative Stress. Prooxidants and Antioxidants), Moscow: Slovo, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vol’skii, N.N., Kashlakova, N.V., and Kozlov, V.A., Tsitologiya, 1988, vol. 30, pp. 895–902.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richards, D.M.S., Dean, R.T., and Jessup, W., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1988, vol. 946, pp. 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drapier, J.-C. and Hibbs, J.B., J. Immunol., 1988, vol. 140, pp. 2829–2838.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman, M.E., Mello-Filho, A.C., and Meneghini, R., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1984, vol. 781, pp. 234–238.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harman, D., Mutat. Res., 1992, vol. 275, pp. 257–266.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beckman, K.B. and Ames, B.N., Physiol. Rev., 1998, vol. 78, pp. 547–581.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grollman, A.P. and Moriya, M., Trends Genet., 1993, vol. 9, pp. 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halliwell, B., Lancet, 1994, vol. 344, pp. 721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhuravlev, A.I., Bioantiokisliteli v regulyatsii metabolisma v norme i patologii, (Bioantioxidants in the regulation of metabolism in norm and pathology), Moscow: Nauka, 1982, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bast, A. and Haenen, G.R., Antioxidants in Therapy and Preventive Medicine, N.-Y.: Plenum Press, 1990, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munday, R. and Winterboume, C.C., Biochem. Pharmacol., 1989, vol. 38, pp. 4349–4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wengel, A., Enzymes — Tools and Targets, Basel: Karget, 1988, pp. 161–167.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kenya, M.V., Lukash, A.I., Gus’kov, E.P., Usp. Sovr. Biol., 1993, vol. 113, pp. 456–470.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abramova, Zh.I. and Oksengendler, G.I., Chelovek i protivookislitel’nye veshchestva, (Man and Antioxidant Substances), Leningrad; Nauka, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beyer, R.E., Free Radical Biol. Med., 1990, vol. 8, pp. 545–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roginskii, V.A., Fenol’nyie antioksidanty: reaktsionnaya sposobnost’ i effektivnost’ (Phenolic Antioxidants: Reactivity and Effectiveness), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mickle, D.A.G., Li, R.K., Weisel, R.D., Tumiati, L.C., and Wu, T.W., J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 1990, vol. 22, pp. 1297–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Voskresenskii, O.N., Zhutaev, I.A., Bobyrev, V.N., and Bezuglyi, Yu.V., Vopr. Med. Khim., 1982, no. 1, pp. 14–27.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sokolovskii, V.V., Vopr. Med. Khim., 1988, no. 6, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maron, D.M. and Ames, B.N., Mutat. Res., 1983, vol. 113, pp. 173–215.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quillardet, P. and Hofnung, M., Mutat. Res., 1985, vol. 147, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asad, N.R., CEB de Almedia, LMBO Asad, Felzeswalb, I., and Leitao, A.C., Biochimie, 1995, vol. 77, pp. 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gomes, E.M., Souto, P.R., and Felzeswalb, I., Mutat. Res., 1996, vol. 367, pp. 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Imlay, J., and Linn, S., Science, 1988, vol. 240, pp. 640–642, 1302–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Asad, N.R. and Leitao, A.C., J. Bacteriol., 1991, vol. 173, pp. 2562–2568.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kemeleva, E.A., Vasyunina, E.A., Sinitsyna, O.I., Khomchenko, A.S., Gross, M.A., Kandalintseva, N.V., Prosenko, A.E., and Nevinsky, G.A., Bioorgan. Khim., 2008, vol. 34, pp. 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    DeWitt, S.K. and Adelbeg, E.A., Genetics, 1962, vol. 47, pp. 577–585.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oleinick, A.S., Kuprina, T.S., Pevneva, N.Yu., Markov, A.F., Kandalintseva, N.V., Prosenko, A.E., and Grigor’ev, I.A., Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2007, vol. 6, pp. 1094–1101.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kandalintseva, N.V., Prosenko, A.E., Dyubchenko, O.I., and Stoyanov, E.S., Zh. Org. Khim., 2001, vol. 9, pp. 1317–1320.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miller, J., Eksperimenty v molekulyarnoi genetike, (Experiments in Molecular Genetics), Mir: Moscow, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhatnagar, S.K. and Bessman, M.J., J. Biol. Chem., 1988, vol. 263, pp. 8953–8957.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miller, J.H. and Michael, M., Gene, 1996, vol. 179, pp. 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lin, J.J. and Sancar, A., Bochemistry, 1989, vol. 28, pp. 7979–7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oleinik, A.S., Pevneva, N.Yu., Kandalintseva, N.V., Prosenko, A.E., Khoschenko, O.M., and Dushkin, M.I., Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya, 2008, vol. 5, pp. 559–564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. N. Rotskaya
    • 1
  • L. P. Ovchinnikova
    • 1
  • E. A. Vasunina
    • 1
  • O. I. Sinitsina
    • 1
  • N. V. Kandalintseva
    • 2
  • E. A. Prosenko
    • 2
  • G. A. Nevinsky
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and GeneticsSiberian Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State Pedagogic UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental MedicineSiberian Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations