Cell and Tissue Biology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 313–320 | Cite as

Distribution of bone-marrow stromal cells in a 3D scaffold depending on the seeding method and the scaffold inside a surface modification

  • Yu. A. Nashchekina
  • P. O. Nikonov
  • V. M. Mikhailov
  • G. P. Pinaev
Article

Abstract

The distribution of bone-marrow stromal cells (BMSC) was studied in 3D polylactide scaffolds. Seeding of cells into the scaffold by the dynamic method (with the aid of a peristaltic pump) has been shown to provide distribution of cells throughout the entire scaffold volume, unlike the static method of seeding, in which the cell suspension is applied onto the scaffold surface. Unlike the cells seeded into the scaffold by the dynamic method, the cells seeded by the static method practically completely migrate from the scaffold on the dish for the first several days. It is revealed that BMSCs cultivated in 3D polylactide scaffolds modified by fibrin form colonies, whereas BMSCs cultivated inside scaffolds modified by collagen type 1 distribute all over the scaffold volume in the form of individual cells.

Keywords

3D polylactide scaffolds collagen of type 1 fibrin bone marrow stromal cells 

Abbreviations

BMSC

bone-marrow stromal cell

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauwens, C.L., Peerani, R., Niebruegge, S., Woodhouse, K.A., Kumacheva, E., Husain, M., and Zandstra, P.W., Control of human embryonic stem cell colony and aggregate size heterogeneity influences differentiation trajectories, Stem Cells, 2008, vol. 26, pp. 2300–2310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyce, S.T. and Warden, G.D., Principles and practices for treatment of cutaneous wounds with cultured skin substitutes, Amer. J. Surgery, 2002, vol. 183, pp. 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capes, J.S., Ando, H.Y., and Camron, R.E., Fabrication of polymeric scaffolds with a controlled distribution of pores, J. Mater. Sci., Mater. Med., 2005, vol. 16, pp. 1069–1075.Google Scholar
  4. Carolyn, S.A., Reed, M.W.R., and Brown, N.J., A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays, Int. J. of Exper. Pathol., 2009, vol. 90, pp. 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandrakasan, G., Torchia, D.A., and Piez, K.A., Preparation of intact monomeric collagen from rat tail tendon and skin and the structure of the nonhelical ends in solution, J. Biol. Chem., 1967, vol. 251, pp. 6062–6067.Google Scholar
  6. Choi, S-W., Xie, J., and Xia, Y., Chitosan-based inverse opals: three-dimensional scaffolds with uniform pore structures for cell culture, Adv. Mat., 2009, vol. 21, pp. 2997–3001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai, N.T., Williamson, M.R., Khammo, N., Adams, E.F., and Coombes, A.G., Composite cell support membranes based on collagen and polycaprolactone for tissue engineering of skin, Biomaterials, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 4263–4271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dar, A., Shachar, M., Leor, J., and Cohen, S., Optimization of cardiac cell seeding and distribution in 3D porous alginate scaffolds, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2002, vol. 80, pp. 305–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dvorak, H.F., Harvey, V.S., Estrella, P., Brown, L.F., McDonagh, J., and Dvorak, A.M., Fibrin containing gels induce angiogenesis. Implications for tumor stroma generation and wound healing, Lab. Invest., 1987, vol. 57, pp. 673–686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hou, Q.P., Grijpma, D.W., and Feijen, J., Porous polymeric structures for tissue engineering prepared by a coagulation, compression moulding and salt leaching technique, Biomaterials, 2003, vol. 24, pp. 1937–1947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khademhosseini, A., Langer, R., Borenstein, J., and Vacanti, J.P., Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, vol. 103, pp. 2480–2487.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khetani, S.R. and Bhatia, S.N., Engineering tissues for in vitro applications, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2005, vol. 17, pp. 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mikos, A.G., Thorsen, A.J., Czerwonka, L.A., Bao, Y., Langer, R., Winslow, D.N., and Vacanti, J.P., Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid) foams, Polymer, 1994, vol. 35, pp. 1068–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nikolaenko, N.S., Tsypkina, N.V., Pinaev, G.P., Dulaev, A.K., Deev, R.V., and Gololobov, V.G., Isolation and culture of bone marrow stromal cells with a view to their use in treating bone defects, Transplantologiya, 2003, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 169–171.Google Scholar
  15. Ruszczak, Z.B., Modern aspects of wound healing: an update, Dermatol. Surg., 2000, vol. 26, pp. 219–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rybarczyk, B.J., Lawrence, S.O., and Simpson-Haidaris, P.J., Matrix-fibrinogen enhances wound closure by increasing both cell proliferation and migration, Blood, 2003, vol. 102, pp. 4035–4043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shi, G.X., Wang, S.G., and Bei, J.Z., Preparation of porous cell scaffolds of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic-go-glycolic acid) and measurement of their porosity, J. Funct. Polymer., 2001, vol. 14, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
  18. Shved, Yu.A., Kukhareva, L.B., Zorin, I.M., Solovyov, A.Yu., Blinova, M.I., Bilibin, A.Yu., and Pinaev, G.P., Cultivation of human dermal fibroblasts on the polylactide polymer films, Tsitologiia, 2006, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 161–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shved, Yu.A., Zorin, I.M., Bilibin, A.Yu., Kukhareva, L.B., Blinova, M.I., and Pinaev, G.P., Interaction of cultured skin cells with the polylactide matrix coved with different collagen structural isoforms, Cell Tissue Biol., 2007, vol. 1, pp. 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Takei, A., Tashiro, Y., Nakashima, Y., and Sueishi, K., Effects of fibrin on the angiogenesis in vitro of bovine endothelial cells in collagen gel, In Vitro Cell. Devel. Biol. Animal., 1995, vol. 31, pp. 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Obradovic, B., Martin, I., Bursac, P.M., Langer, R., and Freed, L.E., Dynamic cell seeding of polymer scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Biotechnol. Prog., 1998, vol. 14, pp. 193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whang, K., Healy, K.E., Elenz, D.R., Nam, E.K., Tsai, D.C., Thomas, C.H., Nuber, G.W., Glorieux, F.H., Travers, R., and Sprague, S.M., Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture, Tis. Eng., 1999, vol. 5, pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu, D.G., Lin, W.C., and Yang, M.C., Surface modification of poly(L-lactic acid) membrane via layer-by-layer assembly of silver nanoparticle-embedded polyelectrolyte multilayer, Bioconjugate Chem., 2007, vol. 18, pp. 1521–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu, H., Ji, J., and Shen, J., Surface engineering of poly(D,L-lactic acid) by entrapment of biomacromolecules, Macromol. Rapid Comm., 2002, vol. 23, pp. 819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu, X.H., Arifin, D.Y., Khoo, B.H., Hua, J., and Wang, C-H., Study of cell seeding on porous poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) sponge and growth in a Couette-Taylor bioreactor, Chem. Eng. Science, 2010, vol. 65, pp. 2108–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. A. Nashchekina
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. O. Nikonov
    • 1
  • V. M. Mikhailov
    • 1
  • G. P. Pinaev
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of CytologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry of High Molecular CompoundsSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations