Cell and Tissue Biology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 297–310 | Cite as

Chloroplast structure of diatoms of different classes

  • Ye. D. Bedoshvili
  • T. P. Popkova
  • Ye. V. Likhoshway
Article

Abstract

The diversity of chloroplast forms, and their number and cellular location, as well as pyrenoid structure, distinguishes diatoms from other groups of heterokont algae. The fine chloroplast structure is considered to be informative for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of diatoms. Six species of diatoms belonging to different classes have been examined with transmission electron microscopy. New data on the chloroplast structure have been obtained. Characteristics of the pyrenoid ultrastructure of diatoms belonging to various phylogenetic clades have been defined more precisely. The results specify the ultrastructure of pyrenoids for different phylogenetic clades of diatoms and contribute to the previously obtained data.

Key words

diatoms pyrenoid ultrastructure chloroplast 

Abbreviations

LM

light microscopy

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brezina, V. and Ettle, H., Eine Komplexe Cytologische Darstellungsmethode fur Untersuchungen des Lebenszyclus von Kieselalgen (Diatoma hiemale var. mesodon), Mikroskople, 1975, vol. 31, pp. 291–293.Google Scholar
  2. Cox, E.J., The Use of Chloroplasts and Other Features of the Living Cell in the Taxonomy of Naviculoid Diatoms, in Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Koenigstein: Koeltz, 1981, pp. 33–115.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, E.J., Variation within the Genus Pinnularia Ehrenb.: Further Evidence for the Use of Live Material in Diatom Systematics, in Proceedings of the 9th International Diatom Symposium, Bristol: Biopress, 1988, pp. 437–444.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, R.M., The Auxospore Wall of the Marine Diatom Melosira nummuloides (Dillw.) C. Ag. and Related Species, Br. Phycol. J., 1974, vol. 9, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford, R.M., The Protoplasmic Ultrastructure of the Vegetative Cell of Melosira varians C.A. Agardh, J. Phycol., 1973, vol. 9, pp. 50–61.Google Scholar
  6. Drum, R.W. and Pankratz, S., Pyrenoids, Raphes, and Other Fine Structure in Diatoms, Am. J. Bot., 1964, vol. 51, pp. 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drum, R.W., Light and Electron Microscope Observations of the Tube Dwelling Diatom Amphipleura rutians (Trentepohl) Cleve., J. Phycol., 1969, vol. 5, pp. 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drum, R.W., Pankratz, S., and Stoermer, E.F., Electron Microscopy of Diatom Cells, in Diatomeenschalen im electronenmikroschen Bild. Lehre, Cramer, J., Ed., 1966, part VI, pp. 514–613.Google Scholar
  9. Geitler, L., Der Chromatophorenbau der Diatomeen Gyrosigma attenuatum und Nitzschia sigmoidea, Beihefte zum Botanische Centrakblatt, 1937, vol. 57, pp. 425–431.Google Scholar
  10. Geitler, L., Der Formwechsel der Pennaten Diatomeen, Archive fur Protistenkunde, 1932, vol. 76, pp. 1–226.Google Scholar
  11. Geitler, L., Die Lage des Chromatophors in Beziehung zur Systematik von Cymbella-Arten (Bacillariophyceae), Pl. Syst. Evol., 1981, vol. 138, pp. 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geitler, L., Die Plasticshe Verformung Reich Gegliederter Chromatophoren Wuhrend der Zellteilung und die Zellorganisation von Cocconeis, Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 1972, vol. 120, pp. 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geitler, L., Die Zweiteiligkeit der Chromatophoren bei den Diatomeen und Chrisophyceon, Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 1967, vol. 114, pp. 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geitler, L., Morphologische, Entwicklungsgcshichtliehe und Systematische Notizen Uber Einige Susswasseralgen, Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 1959, vol. 106, pp. 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs, S.P., The Route of Entry of Cytoplasmically Synthesized Proteins Into Chloroplasts of Algae Possessing Chloroplast ER, J. Cell Sci., 1979, vol. 35, pp. 253–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holdsworth, R.H., The Presence of a Crystalline Matrix in Pyrenoids of the Diatom Achnanthes brevipes, J. Cell Biol., 1968, vol. 37, pp. 831–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoops, H.J. and Floyd, G.L., Ultrastructure of the Centric Diatom Cyclotella menenginiana Vegetative Cell and Auxospore Development, Phycologia, 1979, vol. 18, pp. 424–435.Google Scholar
  18. Jeffrey, S.W. and Vesk, M., Effect of Blue-Green Light on Photosynthetic Pigments and Chloroplast Structure in the Marine Diatom Stephanopyxis turris, J. Phycol., 1977, vol. 13, pp. 271–279.Google Scholar
  19. Kociolek, J.P., Sicko-Goad, L., and Stoermer, E.F., Cytoplasmic Fine Structure of Two Encyonema Species, in Proceedings of the 11th International Diatom Symposium, San-Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, 1990, pp.235–245.Google Scholar
  20. Lauterborn, R., Untersuchugen uber Bau, Kernteilung und Bewegung der Diatomeen, Leipzig: Engelmann, 1896.Google Scholar
  21. Li, C.W. and Volcani, B.E., Studies on the Biochemistry and Fine Structure of Silica Shell Formation in Diatoms. VIII. Morphogenesis of the Wall in the Centric Diatom, Ditylum brightweilli, Protoplasma, 1985, vol. 124, pp. 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mann, D.G., Chloroplast Morphology, Movements and Inheritance in Diatoms, in Cytology, Genetics, and Molecular Biology of Algae, Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publ., 1996. pp. 249–274.Google Scholar
  23. Manton, I. and Von Stosch, H.A., Observations on the Fine Structure of the Male Gamete of the Marine Centric Diatoms Lithodesmium undulatum, J. Royal Microscop. Soc., 1966, vol. 85, pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
  24. McFadden, G.I., Primary and Secondary Endosymbiosis and the Origin of Plastids, J. Phycol., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Medlin, L. K. and Kaczmarska, I., Evolution of the Diatoms: V. Morphological and Cytological Support of the Major Clades and Taxonomic Revision, Phicologia, 2004, vol. 43, pp. 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medlin, L. K., Evolution of the Diatoms — A Total Approach using Morphology, Molecules and Geology, Report of the Workshop on Diatom Research, June 1–2, 1997, 1997, pp. 371–379.Google Scholar
  27. Mereschkowsky, C., Uber Natur und Ursprung der Chromatophoren im Pflanzenreiche, Biol. Centralbl., 1905, vol. 25, pp. 593–604.Google Scholar
  28. Osada, K., Cell Division and Valve Formation in Entomoeneis Species, in Abstracts of 16th International Diatom Symposium, Athens: Amvrosiou Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Pickett-Heaps, J.D., Post Mitotic Cellular Reorganization in the Diatom Cymatopleura solea: The Role of Microtubules and the Microtubule Centre, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 1991, vol. 18, pp. 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ragueneau, O., Treguer, P., Leynaert, A., Anderson, R. F., Brzezinski, M. A., DeMaster, D. J., Dugdale, R.C., Dymond, J., Fischer, G., Francois, R., Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Martin-Jezequel, V., Nelson, D.M., and Queguiner, B., A Review of the Si Cycle in the Modern Ocean: Recent Progress and Missing Gaps in the Application of Biogenic Opal as a Paleoproductivity Proxy, Glob. Planet. Change, 2000, vol. 26, pp. 317–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reynolds, E. S., The Use of Lead Citrate at High pH as an Electron-Opaque Stain in Electron Microscopy, J. Cell Biol., 1963, vol. 17, pp. 208–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen, B.H. and Lowe, R.L., Physiological and Ultrastructural Responses of Cyclotella menenghiniana (Bacillariophyta) to Light Intensity and Nutrient Limitation, J. Phycol., 1984, vol. 20, pp. 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Round, F.E., Crawford, R.M., and Mann D.G., The Diatoms, Bristol: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  34. Schmid, A.-M.M., Aspects of Morphogenesis and Function of Diatom Cell Walls with Implication for Taxonomy, Protoplasma, 1994, vol. 181, pp. 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmid, A.-M.M., Geitler’s Plattenband in Synedra ulna in the Light of TEM Investigations, Pl. Syst. Evol., 1989, vol. 164, pp. 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmid, A.-M.M., Value of Pyrenoids in the Systematics of the Diatoms: Their Morphology and Ultrastructure, in Proceedings of the 16th International Diatom Symposium, Athens: Amvrosiou Press, 2001, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  37. Sedova, T.V., Osnovy tsitologii vodoroslei (Fundamentals of Algal Cytology), Leningrad: Nauka, 1977.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, M. A., The Effect of Heavy Metals on the Cytoplasmic Fine Structure of Sceletonema costatum (Bacillariophyta), Protoplasma, 1983, vol. 116, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoermer, E.F., Pankratz, H.S., and Bowen, C.C., Fine Structure of the Diatom Amphipleura pellucida. II. Cytoplasmic Fine Structure and Frustule Formation, Am. J. Bot., 1965, vol. 52, pp. 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, D.L., Ultrastructure of Cocconeis diminuta Pantocsek, Archive fur Mikribiologie, 1972, vol. 31, pp. 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tschermak-Woess, E., Uber aufallendeStrukturen in den Pyrenoiden einiger Naviculoideen. Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 1953, vol. 100, pp. 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van den Hoek, C., Mann, D.G., and Jahns, H.M., Algae, Bristol: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Vasser, S.P., Kondrat’eva, N.V., and Masyuk, N.P., Vodorosli: Spravochnik (Algae: A Handbook), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1989.Google Scholar
  44. Whatley, J.M. and Whatley, F.R., Chloroplast Evolution, New Phytol., 1981, vol. 87, pp. 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ye. D. Bedoshvili
    • 1
  • T. P. Popkova
    • 1
  • Ye. V. Likhoshway
    • 1
  1. 1.Siberian BranchLimnological Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations