Skip to main content
Log in

A Cut Generation Algorithm of Finding an Optimal Solution in a Market Competition

  • Published:
Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a mathematical model of market competition between two parties. The parties sequentially bring their products to the market while aiming to maximize profit. The model is based on the Stackelberg game and formulated as a bilevel integer mathematical program. The problem can be reduced to the competitive facility location problem (CompFLP) with a prescribed choice of suppliers which belongs to a family of bilevel models generalizing the classical facility location problem. For the CompFLP with a prescribed choice of suppliers, we suggest an algorithm of finding a pessimistic optimal solution. The algorithm is an iterative procedure that successively strengthens an estimating problem with additional constraints. The estimating problem provides an upper bound for the objective function of the CompFLP and is resulted from the bilevel model by excluding the lower-level objective function. To strengthen the estimating problem, we suggest a new family of constraints. Numerical experiments with randomly generated instances of the CompFLP with prescribed choice of suppliers demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. L. Beresnev and V. I. Suslov, “A Mathematical Model of Market Competition,” Sibir. Zh.Industr.Mat. 12 (1), 11–24 (2009) [J. Appl. Indust. Math. 4 (2), 147–157 (2010)].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. H. von Stackelberg, The Theory of the Market Economy (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. L. Beresnev and A. A. Melnikov, “The Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for a Competitive Facility Location Problem with the Prescribed Choice of Suppliers,” Diskretn. Anal. Issled. Oper. 21 (2), 3–23 (2014) [J. Appl. Indust. Math. 8 (2), 177–189 (2014)].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Melnikov, “Randomized Local Search for the Discrete Competitive Facility Location Problem,” Avtomat. Telemekh. No. 4, 134–152 (2014) [Automat. Remote Control 75 (4), 700–714 (2014)].

  5. V. L. Beresnev, “On the Competitive Facility Location Problem with a Free Choice of Suppliers,” Avtomat. Telemekh. No. 4, 94–105 (2014) [Automat. Remote Control 75 (4), 668–676 (2014)].

  6. V. L. Beresnev, “Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for a Competitive Facility Location Problem,” Comput. Oper. Res. 40 (8), 2062–2070 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. V. L. Beresnev and A. A. Melnikov, “Exact Method for the Capacitated Competitive Facility Location Problem,” Comput. Oper. Res. 95, 73–82 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Cánovas, A. García, M. Labbé, and A. Marín, “A Strengthened Formulation for the Simple Plant Location Problem with Order,” Oper. Res. Lett. 35 (2), 141–150 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Hanjoul and D. Peeters, “A Facility Location Problem with Clients’ Preference Orderings,” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 17 (3), 451–473 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Vasil’ev, X. Klimentova, and M. Boccia, “Polyhedral Study of Simple Plant Location Problem with Order,” Oper. Res. Lett. 41 (2), 153–158 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Dempe, Foundations of Bilevel Programming (Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2002).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hemmati and J. C. Smith, “A Mixed-Integer Bilevel Programming Approach for a Competitive Prioritized Set Covering Problem,” Discrete Optim. 20, 105–134 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. V. L. Beresnev and A. A. Melnikov, “Cut Generation Algorithm for the Discrete Competitive Facility Location Problem,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 80 (5), 515–518 (2018) [Dokl. Math. 97 (3), 254–257 (2018)].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. V. L. Beresnev and A. A. Melnikov, “Approximation of the Competitive Facility Location Problem with MIPs”, Comput. Oper. Res. 104, 139–148 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. T. Moore and J. F. Bard, “The Mixed Integer Linear Bilevel Programming Problem,” Oper. Res. 38 (5), 911–921 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual, Gurobi Optimization (2018). Available at https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/8.1/refman.pdf (accessed Feb. 11, 2019).

  17. Benchmark Library ‘Discrete Location Problems’, available at http://math.nsc.ru/AP/benchmarks/english.html (accessed Feb. 11, 2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. L. Beresnev or A. A. Melnikov.

Additional information

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Diskretnyi Analiz i Issledovanie Operatsii, 2019, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 5–29.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beresnev, V.L., Melnikov, A.A. A Cut Generation Algorithm of Finding an Optimal Solution in a Market Competition. J. Appl. Ind. Math. 13, 194–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990478919020029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990478919020029

Keywords

Navigation