Advertisement

Russian Journal of Pacific Geology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 138–150 | Cite as

Landscape-geochemical zoning of the Amur Basin (Russian Territory)

  • A. F. Makhinova
  • A. N. Makhinov
  • V. A. Kuptsova
  • Shuguang Liu
  • V. V. Ermoshin
Article

Abstract

This study presents the landscape-geochemical characteristics of the Russian part of the Amur Basin and highlights the influence of geographic factors on the formation of the soil geochemical systems. The spatial variability of the element concentrations in the background soils is found to be a function of the mobility of the elements in organometallic compounds. The formation of the landscape-geochemical features is briefly reviewed. New approaches and principles of landscape-geochemical zonation are used to compile the map of the landscape-geochemical zoning of the Amur Basin on a scale of 1: 2500000, which shows the landscape-geochemical features reflecting the spatial variability of the element concentrations and the conditions of the element migration in the soils.

Keywords

soils soil geochemical fluxes migration zone landscape-geochemical zonation Amur basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. I. Arkhipov, Evolution and Distribution of Iron Ores in Northeast Asia (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. P. Bel’chikova, “Determination of soil humus using the Tyurin technique,” in Agrochemical Methods in Soil Study (Nauka, Moscow, 1975), pp. 56–62 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Vernadskii, Chemical Structure of the Earth Biosphere and its Surroundings (Nauka, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. A. Verkhovskaya and E. P. Sorokina, Mathematical Modeling of Geochemical Field for Prospecting Purposes (Nedra, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. P. Vinogradov, “Average content of chemical elements in major types of igneous rocks,” Geokhimiya, No. 7, 555–571 (1962).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Glazovskaya, “Geochemical landscapes around the world: concepts and principles of mapping,” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 5, 25–33 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. A. Glazovskaya, N. S. Kasimov, and A. I. Perel’man, “Landscape geochemistry: main notions required for background monitoring,” in Landscape-Geochemical Principles of Background Natural Monitoring (Nauka, Moscow, 1989), pp. 8–25 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. P. Zvereva, “Modern aspects of supergenesis in geo-ecology as exemplifed by the Far East mining industry,” Gorn. Inform.-Analit. Byull, No. 15, 230–240 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. G. Isachenko, Principles of Landscape Science and Physical-Geographical Zoning (Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. S. Kasimov, I. P. Gavrilova, M. I. Gerasimova, and M. D. Bogdanova, “New landscape-geochemical map of Russia,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 5: Geogr., No. 1, 30–44 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. V. Kulakov, L. M. Kondrat’eva, and E. M. Golubeva, “Geological and biogeochemical prerequisites for high Fe and Mn contents in the Amur River water,” Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 4(6), 510–519 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. N. Makhinov, Formation of Slopes with Moving Denudation Basis (DVNTs AN SSSR, Vladivostok, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. N. Makhinov and A. F. Makhinova, “Transformation of anthropogenic relief in the sites of placer minings,” Geomorfologiya, No. 2, 43–49 (2006).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. N. Makhinov, A. F. Makhinova, and M. N. Shevtsov, “Environmental effect of wastes of ore-dressing plants of the Khabarovsk krai,” Gornyi Zh., No. 4, 83–86 (2006).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. F. Makhinova, Soil Cover of the Lower Amur Region (DVO AN SSSR, Vladivostok, 1989) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. F. Makhinova, A. N. Makhinov, and V. V. Ermoshin, “Main geochemical fluxes in the landscapes of the Amur River basin, Russia,” in Landscape Geochemistry and Soil Geography: Reports of All-Russian Conference on 100 Anniversary of M. A. Glazovskaya (Moscow, 2012), pp. 215–218 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. V. Nikol’skaya, Morphological Sculpture of the Amur Basin (Nauka, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. V. Novorotskii, “Climatic changes in the Amur Basin for the last 115 years,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 2, 43–53 (2007).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. S. Orlov, L. K. Sadovnikova, and N. I. Sukhanova, Soil Chemistry (Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. P. Perel’man and N. S. Kasimov, Landscape Geochemistry (MGU, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. I. Popkova, E. F. Kaidalova, T. V. Klimovskaya, and N. P. Savrasov, Chemical Analyses of Igneous Rocks from the Southern Far East (Khabarovsk, 1961) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. I. Roslikova, Ferromanganese Neomorphs in Soils of the Plain Landscapes of Humid Zone (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 1966) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. P. Sorokina, N. K. Dmitrieva, L. K. Karpov, and V. V. Maslennikov, “Analysis of regional geochemical background as basis for ecological-geochemical mapping of plain territories by the example of the northern Western Siberian region,” in Applied Geochemistry (IMGRE, Moscow, 2001), No. 2, pp. 316–338 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. V. Smagin, “Theory and methods of evaluating the physical status of soils,” Eur. Soil Sci., 36(3), 301–312 (2003).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. I. Trufanov, “On migration of iron and manganese in supergene zones of the southern Far East,” in Natural Waters of Far East (KhabKNII, Khabarovsk, 1975), pp. 147–154 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    EAO. 1990a. EAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World-Revised Legend.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. F. Makhinova and A. N. Makhinov, “Differentiation of organic matter and major geochemical flows in the Amur basin landscapes,” in Functions of Natural Organic Matter in Changing Environment: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Humic Substances (Springer, 2012), pp. 361–363.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mapping of Soil and Terrain Vulnerability to Specified Chemical Compounds in Europe at a Scale of 1:5M, Ed. by N. H. Batjes and E. M. Bridges (ISRI, Wageningen, 1991).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. Senesi and E. Poffredo, “Metal iron complexation by soil humic substance,” in Chemical Processes in Soils, (Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, 2005), pp. 563–617.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Makhinova
    • 1
  • A. N. Makhinov
    • 1
  • V. A. Kuptsova
    • 1
  • Shuguang Liu
    • 2
  • V. V. Ermoshin
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Water and Ecological Problems, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKhabarovskRussia
  2. 2.Tongji UnversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Pacific Institute of Geography, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations