Self-similarity of hard cumulative processes in fixed target experiment for BES-II at STAR
- 19 Downloads
Search for signatures of phase transition in Au + Au collisions is in the heart of the heavy ion program at RHIC. Systematic study of particle production over a wide range of collision energy revealed new phenomena such as the nuclear suppression effect expressed by nuclear modification factor, the constituent quark number scaling for elliptic flow, the “ridge effect” in Δϕ-Δη fluctuations etc. To determine the phase boundaries and location of the critical point of nuclear matter the Beam Energy Scan (BES-I) program at RHIC has been suggested and performed by STAR and PHENIX Collaborations. The obtained results shown that the program (BES-II) should be continued. In this paper a proposal to use hard cumulative processes in BES Phase-II program is outlined. Selection of the cumulative events is assumed to enrich data sample by new type of collisions characterized by higher energy density and more compressed matter. This would allow finding clearer signatures of phase transition, location of a critical point and studying extreme conditions in heavy ion collisions.
Keywordscumulative process self-similarity high energy heavy ions critical point phase transition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.H. Caines, (for the STAR Collab.), “The RHIC beam energy scan-STAR’S perspective,” in Proceedings for the Rencontres de Moriond 2009, QCD session, arXiv: 0906. 0305v1 [nucl-ex], 1 June, 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collab.), “Experimental study of the QCD phase diagram and search for the critical point: selected arguments for the Run-10 beam energy scan,” June 4, 2009, http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/starnotes/public/sn0493 Google Scholar
- 7.M. M. Aggarwal et al. (STAR Collab.), “An experimental exploration of the QCD phase diagram: The search for the critical point and the onset of deconfinement,” arXiv:1007.2613 [nucl-ex] 15 July, 2010.Google Scholar
- 8.STAR Collab. STAR Collaboration Decadal Plan (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, December, 2010), http://www.bnl.gov/npp/docs/STAR-Decadal-Plan-Final%5B1%5D.pdf
- 9.Hot and Dense QCD Matter, “A community white paper on the future of relativistic heavy-ion physics in the US,” Unraveling the Mysteries of the Strongly Interacting Quark-Gluon-Plasma, http://www.bnl.gov/npp/.
- 10.STAR Collab. Studying the Phase Diagram of QCD Matter at RHIC A STAR white paper summarizing the current understanding and describing future plans, SN0598, June 1, 2014.Google Scholar
- 11.PHENIX Collab., The PHENIX Experiment at RHIC, Decadal Plan 2011–2020 (Brookhaven National Laboratory).Google Scholar
- 12.H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, London, 1971).Google Scholar
- 21.M. V. Tokarev and I. Zborovský, “z-scaling as manifestation of symmetry in Nature,” Selected papers of the seminar (2002–2005), “Symmetries and Integrable Systems,” Ed. by A. N. Sysakian (JINR, Dubna, 2006), vol. II, p. 154.Google Scholar
- 24.I. Zborovský and M. V. Tokarev, “Energy scan in heavyion collisions and search for a critical point,” Phys. At. Nucl. 7, 700 (2012).Google Scholar
- 28.M. V. Tokarev and I. Zborovský, “Energy loss in heavy ion collisions,” in Proceedings 40th International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics (ISMD 2010), 21–25 September, 2010, Antwerp. Belgium, p. 301.Google Scholar
- 29.M. V. Tokarev and I. Zborovský, “Self-similarity of hadron production in heavy ion collisions at RHIC,” Nonlin. Phenom. Complex Syst. 12, 459 (2009).Google Scholar
- 31.V. S. Stavinsky, “Limiting fragmentation of nuclei—cumulative effect,” Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 10, 949 (1979).Google Scholar
- 32.G. A. Leksin, “Nuclear scaling. Elementary particles,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Physics School ITEF (Moscow, 1975), no. 2, p. 5; G. A. Leksin, Nuclear Scaling (Moscow,1975), pp. 90.Google Scholar
- 35.I. M. Belyaev et al., “Production of cumulative pions and kaons in proton-nucleus interactions at energies from 15 to 65 GeV,” Phys. At. Nucl. 56, 1378 (1993).Google Scholar
- 37.N. N. Antonov et al., “Measurement of positive charged particle yields in proton-nucleus interactions at √s NN ≈ 10 GeV and the angle of 35 degree” (“Physics of Fundamental Interactions”, Russian Academy of Science, ITEP, Moscow, Russia, 21–25 November, 2011), http://matras.itep.ru/npd2k11/ Google Scholar
- 38.V. V. Ammosov, N. N. Antonov, A. A. Baldin, et al., “First measurements of cumulative particle production in proton-nucleus interactions at energy 50∼GeV in the region pT > 1 GeV/c,” Seminar LHEP, JINR, June 6, 2012, Dubna, http://lhe.jinr.ru/seminararchive.shtml/
- 39.V. V. Ammosov, N. N. Antonov, A. A. Baldin, et al., “A measurement of the yield of the positive particles escaping at 35° angle from proton interactions with nuclear targets at energy of 50 GeV,” Yad. Fiz. 76, 1275 (2013).Google Scholar