Advertisement

Geology of Ore Deposits

, Volume 51, Issue 7, pp 627–632 | Cite as

Isomorphic substitutions in afghanite: Identification of the mineral

  • A. N. Sapozhnikov
  • D. I. Cherepanov
  • L. F. Suvorova
  • L. P. Feoktistova
Minerals and Parageneses of Minerals
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Samples of afghanite, (Na,Ca,K)8 (Al6Si6O24)(SO4,Cl,CO3)3 · H2O, from the Malaya Bystraya and Tultui lazurite deposits in the Baikal region have been studied with X-ray diffraction and an electron microprobe. The unit-cell dimensions a and c of the examined afghanite samples range from 12.729 to 12.762 &0A and from 21.385 to 21.415 &0A. Isomorphic substitution is exhibited between Na and K; Ca content is about 2.5 apfu; the Cl/SO4 ratio is close to 1.0 with slight variations. Parameter a was plotted versus K content. The correlation between Na and K is established. Comparative analysis has shown that afghanite from the Baikal region is characterized by a lower K content than that from volcanic complexes in Italy. In the studied samples, K2O ranges from 0.51 to 2.28 wt %, whereas in comparable samples from volcanic complexes of Italy, it varies from 3.44 to 8.26 wt %. Sodalite-group minerals display a similar behavior of potassium. In lazurite from the Baikal region, the K2O content ranges from 0 to 0.95 wt %; the K2O content in hauyne from Italy varies from 0.88 to 5.75 wt %. The wider isomorphic miscibility in the feldspar minerals from volcanic-hosted assemblages in Italy as compared with the same minerals from lazurite deposits of the Baikal region reflects the difference in the geological and physicochemical conditions under which the minerals have been formed. In addition to the X-ray procedure, the Cl/SO4 ratio determined from microprobe data may be used to identify cancrinite-group minerals found at the Baikal lazurite deposits. It is near 1.0 in afghanite; 0.8 in tounkite; and more than 2 in davyne.

Keywords

Diopside Baikal Region Volcanic Complex Isomorphic Substitution Microprobe Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Ballirano, A. Maras, and P. R. Buseck, “Crystal Chemistry and IR Spectroscopy of Cl- and SO4-Bearing Cancrinite-Like Minerals,” Am. Miner. (81), 1003–1012 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Ballirano, E. Bonaccorsi, A. Maras, and S. Merlino, “Crystal Structure of Afghanite, the Eight-Layer Member of the Cancrinite-Group: Evidence for Long-Rang Si, Al Ordering,” Eur. J. Miner. 9, 21–30 (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Ballirano, A. Maras, P. R. Buseck, S. Wang, and A. V. Yates, “Improved Powder X-ray Data for Cancrinites: 1. Afghanite,” Powder Diffraction 9,(1), 68–73 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. V. Chukanov, R. K. Rastsvetaeva, I. V. Pekov, and A. E. Zadov, “Alloriite Na5K1.5Ca(Al6Si6O24)(SO4) (OH)0.5 · H2O: A New Mineral Species of the Cancrinite Group,” Zap. Ross. Mineral. O-va 136(1), 82–89 (2007) [Geol. Ore Deposits, Zap. Russian Mineral. Soc. 49 (8), 752–757 (2007)].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. D. Hogart, “Afghanite: New Occurrences and Chemical Composition,” Can. Miner. 17, 47–52 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. G. Ivanov and A. N. Sapozhnikov, Lazurites of the USSR (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Leoni, M. Mellini, S. Merlino, and H. Orlandi, “Cancrinite-Like Minerals: New Data and Crystal Chemical Consideration,” Rendiconti S. I. M. P. 35(2), 713–719 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minerals, Reference Book, Vol. 5: Framework Silicates, Issue 2: Feldspathoids (Nauka, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. C. Parodi, P. Ballirano, and A. Maras, “Afghanite from Mount Vesuvius: A Rediscovery,” Miner. Record. 27, 109–114 (1996).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. A. Pobedimskaya, R. K. Rastsvetaeva, L. E. Terent’eva, and A. N. Sapozhnikov, “Crystalline Structure of Afghanite,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 320(4), 882–886 (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. A. Rozenberg, A. N. Sapozhnikov, R. K. Rastsvetaeva, N. B. Bolotina, and A. A. Kashaev, “Crystal Structure of a New Representative of the Cancrinite Group with a 12-Layer Stacking Sequence of Tetrahedral Rings,” Kristallografiya 49(4), 635–642 (2004) [Crystallogr. Rep. 49 (4), 635–642 (2004)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. N. Sapozhnikov, N. V. Chukanov, L. F. Suvorova, L. P. Feoktistova, and L. A. Bogdanova, “Davin Tultui Lazurite Deposit, the Baikal Region,” Zap. Ross. Mineral. O-va 135(3), 77–84 (2006).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. N. Sapozhnikov, V. I. Levitsky, D. I. Cherepanov, L. F. Suvorova, and L. A. Bogdanova, “On Effect of Chlorine on Configuration of Framework of Cancrinite-Like Minerals,” Zap. Vseross. Mineral. O-va 134(5), 76–86 (2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Sapozhnikov
    • 1
  • D. I. Cherepanov
    • 1
  • L. F. Suvorova
    • 1
  • L. P. Feoktistova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geochemistry, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations