Advertisement

Geology of Ore Deposits

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 109–122 | Cite as

Physicochemical parameters of the melts participating in the formation of chromite ore hosted in the Klyuchevsky ultramafic massif, the Central Urals, Russia

  • V. A. Simonov
  • K. S. Ivanov
  • V. N. Smirnov
  • S. V. Kovyazin
Article

Abstract

The results of melt inclusion study are reported for chromites of the Klyuchevsky ultramafic massif, which is the most representative of all Ural ultramafic massifs localized beyond the Main Ural Fault Zone. The massif is composed of a dunite-harzburgite complex (tectonized mantle peridotite) and a dunite-wehrlite-clinopyroxenite-gabbro complex (layered portion of the ophiolitic section). The studied Kozlovsky chromite deposit is located in the southeastern part of the Klyuchevsky massif and hosted in serpentinized dunite as a series of lenticular bodies and layers up to 7–8 m thick largely composed of disseminated and locally developed massive ore. Melt inclusions have been detected in chromites of both ore types. The heated and then quenched into glass melt inclusions and host minerals were analyzed on a Camebax-Micro microprobe. The glasses of melt inclusions contain up to 1.06 wt % Na2O + K2O and correspond to melts of normal alkalinity. In SiO2 content (49–56 wt %), they fit basalt and basaltic andesite. The melt inclusions are compared with those from chromites of the Nurali massif in the southern Urals and the Karashat massif in southern Tuva. The physicochemical parameters of magmatic systems related to the formation of disseminated and massive chromite ores of the Klyuchevsky massif are different. The former are characterized by a wider temperature interval (1185–1120°C) in comparison with massive chromite ore (1160–1140°C).

Keywords

Olivine Chromite Magmatic System Melt Inclusion Antigorite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Bea, G. B. Fershtater, P. Montero, et al., “Recycling of Continental Crust into the Mantle As Revealed by Kytlym Dunite Zircons, Ural Mts., Russia,” Terra Nova 3, 407–412 (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. D. Bulykin, K. K. Zoloev, and A. N. Mardiros’yan, “Ore Formation Types of Chromite Deposits and Related Platinum Group Elements,” in Actual Problems of Magmatic Geology, Petrology, and Ore Formation (Uralgeolkom, Yekaterinburg, 1995), pp. 68–78 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. V. Danyushevsky, “The Effect of Small Amounts of H2O on Crystallization of Mid-Ocean Ridge and Back-Arc Basin Magmas,” J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res., 110,(3–4), 407–412 (2001).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. A. Efimov, Yu. L. Ronkin, S. Zindern, et al., “New U-Rb Data on Zircons from Plagiogranite of the Kytlym Massif: Isotopic Ages of Late Events in the History of the Ural Platinum Belt,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 403(4), 512–516 (2005) [Dokl.Earth Sci. 403A (6), 896–900 (2005)].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. I. Gurskaya, L. V. Smelova, L. R. Kolbantsev, et al., Platinum Group Elements of Chromite-Bearing Massifs of the Polar Urals (VSEGEI, St. Petersburg, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inventory of Chromite Occurrences in Alpine-Type Ultramafics of the Urals, Ed. by B. V. Perevozchikov (KamNIIKIGS, Perm, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. S. Ivanov, V. N. Smirnov, and Yu. V. Erokhin, Tectonics and Magmatism of Collision Stage (with Reference to the Central Urals) (Ural Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Yekaterinburg, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. S. Kamenetsky, A. J. Crawford, and S. J. Meffre, “Factors Controlling Chemistry of Magmatic Spinel: An Empirical Study of Associated Olivine, Cr-Spinel, and Melt Inclusions of Primitive Rocks,” J. Petrol. 42, 655–671 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. A. Kurenkov, A. N. Didenko, and V. A. Simonov, Geodynamics of Paleospreading (GEOS, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. A. Kurenkov, A. N. Didenko, V. A. Simonov, and N. V. Lubnina, “Geodynamic Formation Conditions of Paleospreading Complexes of the Ural-Mongolian Belt,” in Essays on Regional Tectonics, Vol. 2: Kazakhstan, Tien Shan, Polar Urals (Nauka, Moscow, 2005), pp. 201–247 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Lavrenchuk, “PLUTON Program for Calculation of Intrachamber Fractionation of Basic Magma,” in Proceedings of the Second Siberian International Conference of Young Scientifics on Sciences of the Earth (Novosibirsk, 2004), pp. 105–106 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. S. Popov, “Geological Formation Conditions of Dunite-Clinopyroxenite Associations: General and Specific Features,” in Proceedings of International Scientific Conference on Ophiolites: Geology, Petrology, Metallogeny, and Geodynamics (Inst. Geol. Geokhem., Ural Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Yekaterinburg, 2006), pp. 44–48 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. N. Savelieva, M. A. Shishkin, A. N. Larionov, et al., “Late Vendian Tectonomagmatic Events in Mantle-Derived Complexes of Ophiolites in the Polar Urals: U-Pb Dating of Zircon from Chromitites,” in Proceedings of International Scientific Conference on Ophiolites: Geology, Petrology, Metallogeny, and Geodynamics (Inst. Geol. Geochem., Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2006), pp. 160–164 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Schiano, R. Clocchiatti, J.-P. Lorand, et al., “Primitive Basaltic Melts Included in Podiform Chromites from the Oman Ophiolite,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 146(3/4), 489–497 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. A. Shcherbakov, Ductile Deformation of Ultramafics of Ophiolite Association of the Urals (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. R. Shmelev, “Igneous Complexes of the Main Ural Deep Fault Zone, the Subpolar Urals in the Light of New Geochemical Data,” Litosfera, No. 2, 41–59 (2005).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. A. Simonov, Petrogenesis of Ophiolites (Thermobarogeochemical Study) (UIGGM, Siberian Branch, Russian Acad. Sci., Novosibirsk, 1993) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. A. Simonov and S. V. Kovyazin, “Geochemistry of Rare and Rare Earth Elements in Magmatic Systems Forming Mafic-Ultramafic Series of Ophiolites in Tuva,” in Ultramafic and Mafic Complexes in Foldbelts (Irkutsk State Techn. Univ., Irkutsk, 2007), pp. 242–246 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. A. Simonov, A. Yu. Dunaev, S. V. Kovyazin, and V. V. Zaikov, “Magmatic Systems of Paleooceans: Data on Melt Inclusions in Chrome Spinels,” in Geodynamic Evolution of the Lithosphere of the Central Asian Mobile Belt (from Ocean to Continent) (Inst. Geogr., Siberian Branch, Russian Acad. Sci., Irkutsk, 2004), Vol. 2, pp. 97–100 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. A. Simonov, D. N. Salikhov, S. V. Kovyazin, and A. Yu. Dunaev, “Specific Features of Crystallization of Chromite Ore in the Upper Ubaly Deposit, Southern Urals,” in Metallogeny of Ancient and Modern Oceans-2006. Conditions of Ore Formation (Inst. Mineral., Ural Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Miass, 2006a), 140–145 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. A. Simonov, E. V. Sharkov, S. V. Kovyazin, and N. S. Bortnikov, “Melt Inclusions in Cr-Spinels from the Fe-Ti Oxide Intrusive Complexes of the Central Atlantic: Key to Understanding the Physicochemical Parameters of Hydrothermal-Magmatic Systems in Slow-Spreading Ocean Ridges,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 418(5), 679–682 (2008) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 419 (2), 284–287 (2008)].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. A. Simonov, E. V. Sklyarov, and S. V. Kovyazin, “Melt Inclusions in Chrome Spinels: Source of Direct Information on Parameters of the Oldest Boninite Magmas,” in Petrology of Igneous and Metamorphic Complexes (Center Sci. Techn. Inform., Tomsk, 2005), Vol. I, No. 5, pp. 125–129 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. A. Simonov, S. V. Kovyazin, and E. V. Sharkov, “Crystallization Parameters of Intrusive Complexes in Modern and Ancient Oceans,” in Geodynamic Evolution of the Lithosphere of the Central Asian Mobile Belt (from Ocean to Continent) (Inst. Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch, Russian Acad. Sci., Irkutsk, 2006b) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. N. Smirnov, “Ophiolites in the Eastern Zone of the Middle Urals,” in Proceedings of International Scientific Conference on Ophiolites: Geology, Petrology, Metallogeny, and Geodynamics (Inst. Geol. Geokhem., Ural Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Yekaterinburg, 2006), pp. 164–167 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. V. Sobolev and L. V. Danyushevsky, “Petrology and Geochemistry of Boninites from the North Termination of the Tonga Trench: Constraints on the Generation Conditions of Primary High-Ca Boninite Magmas,” J. Petrol. 35, 1183–1211 (1994).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu. A. Volchenko, K. S. Ivanov, V. A. Koroteev, and T. Auger, “Lithotectonic Evolution of Complexes of the Ural Platinum Belt during Formation of Ural-Type Chromite-PGE Deposits,” Litosfera, No. 3, 3–24 (2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Simonov
    • 1
  • K. S. Ivanov
    • 2
  • V. N. Smirnov
    • 2
  • S. V. Kovyazin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations