Studies on Russian Economic Development

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 144–152 | Cite as

Development Trajectories of the Russian Far East: Evaluation Based on the Dynamic Model of Economic Interactions

  • N. G. Dzhurka
Regional Problems


The article discusses the possible development trajectories for the Far East formed under the influence of the policy of creating preferences for economic activities in the region. A dynamic model of economic interactions has been proposed for identifying these trajectories. Based on the model calculations, the complementarity of various incentive schemes for economic activity in the Far East is analyzed and the dependence of economic growth on the scale of the state support is assessed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. B. Dixon, B. R. Parmenter, and J. Sutton, “Spatial disaggregation of ORANI results: A preliminary analysis of the impacts of protection at the state level,” Econ. Anal. Policy 8 (1), 35–86 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. B. Dixon, M. T. Rimmer, and M. Tsigas, “Regionalising results from a detailed CGE model: Macro, industry and state effects in the US of removing major tariffs and quotes,” Pap. Reg. Sci. 86 (1), 31–55 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. A. Giesecke, Development of a Large-Scale Single U.S. Region CGE Model Using IMPLAN Data: A Los Angeles County Example with a Productivity Shock Application. General Working Paper G-187 (Centre of Policy Studies, Melbourne, 2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. R. Madden, Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Tasmania, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Harrigan, P. G. McGregor, N. Dourmashkin, R. Perman, J. K. Swales, and Y. P. Yin, “AMOS: A macro-micro model of Scotland,” Econ. Modell. 8 (4), 424–479 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Gillespie, P. G. McGregor, J. K. Swales, and Y. P. Yin, “The displacement and multiplier effects of regional selective assistance: A computable general equilibrium analysis,” Reg. Stud. 35 (2), 125–139 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. D. Adams, J. M. Dixon, J. A. Giesecke, and J. M. Horridge, MMRF: Monash Multiregional Forecasting Model: A Dynamic Multiregional Model of the Australian Economy, General Working Paper G-223 (Melbourne, 2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Lkhanaajav, CoPS Style Modelling and Analysis. CoPS Working Paper G-264 (Centre of Policy Studies, Melbourne, 2016).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. A. Giesecke, The FEDERAL-F Model. CREA Paper № TS-07 (Centre for Regional Economic Analysis, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 1997).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. A. Giesecke and J. R. Madden, “Competition reforms and collaborative federalism: A dynamic multiregional applied general equilibrium analysis,” in 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (University of Dortmund, 2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Gillespie, P. G. McGregor, J. K. Swales, and Y. P. Yin, “A computable general equilibrium approach to the ex post evaluation of regional development agency policies,” in Regional Policies and Comparative Advantage, Ed. by B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, and R. R. Slough (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2002), pp. 253–282.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Gilmartin, D. Learmonth, P. McGregor, K. Swales, and K. Turner, “Regional policy spillovers: The national impact of demand-side policy in an interregional model of the UK economy,” SIRE Discuss. Pap., No. 46 (2011).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. A. Minakir, “The Far East and Transbaikalia on the eve of the reform: The concept of entering the market,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 1, 17–51 (2017).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. M. Prokapalo, A. G. Isaev, D. V. Suslov, E. I. Devaeva, and T. E. Kotova, “The economic situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2010,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 2, 54–91 (2011).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. N. Leksin and B. N. Porfiryev, “Evaluation of the effectiveness of government programs of socioeconomic development of regions of Russia,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (4), 418–428 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Briefing of Yury Trutnev following the results of the meeting on preliminary results of the territories of advanced development (TADs). Ministry for the Development of the Far East (2017). Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. G. Zakharchenko and O. V. Demina, “Modeling of economic interactions in the energy–economy system: The experience of the Far East,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 1, 62–90 (2015).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. N. Mikheeva, “Statistical evaluation of input-output tables for the Russian Far East,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 2, 61–79 (2005).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. I. Vlasyuk, “A study of the economy of the Russian Far East on the basis of “input-output” tables,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 2, 79–90 (2006).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. I. Vlasyuk, N. G. Zakharchenko, and V. D. Kalashnikov, “Research of regional macroeconomic proportions and multiplicative effects: Khabarovsk Territory,” Prostranstvennaya Ekon., No. 2, 44–66 (2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research InstituteFar Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesKhabarovskRussia

Personalised recommendations