International experience in the organization of science, with special reference to the USA
The organization of academic science in the United States and its relationship with the economy and private business are analyzed. The extent to which organizational measures taken and methods used are adequate to the actual trends of the evolution of world science is examined. It is suggested that some international experience can be borrowed for the benefit of reform of Russian science.
KeywordsIntellectual Property Private Investment RUSSIAN Economic Development International Experience Private Business
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004, Vol. 1 (NSF, Arlington, VA, 2004).Google Scholar
- 2.NSF Division of Scientific Resource Statistics, National Patterns of R and D Resources: 2003 (NSF 05-308, Brandon Shackelford, Arlington, VA, 2005).Google Scholar
- 3.G. B. Kochetkov and V. B. Supyan, Corporation: The American Model (Piter, St. Petersburg, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 4.Office of Management and Budget, Circular No. A-21 “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions”; Circular No. A-122 “Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations”; Circular No. A-110 “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations”; Circular No. A087 “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments,” http://whitehouse.gov/om6/circulars.html.
- 5.Graduate Student Assistantships. Stanford University. Administrative Guide Memo 24.2, Sept. 2005.Google Scholar
- 6.Department of Treasury. Internal Revenue Service, Charitable Contributions (Publ. 526, Dec. 2003).Google Scholar
- 7.Office of Technology Licensing. Guiding Principle (http://www.princeton.edu/patents/intelprop.htm), Nov. 15 (2005).