Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry

, Volume 90, Issue 10, pp 1605–1613 | Cite as

Hybrid Catalysts Based on Sulfated Zirconium Dioxide and H-beta Zeolite for Alkylation of Isobutane with Isobutylene

  • E. A. Yuferova
  • S. Yu. Devyatkov
  • S. P. Fedorov
  • K. V. Semikin
  • D. A. Sladkovskii
  • N. V. Kuzichkin
Various Technological Processes
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Physicochemical properties of new hybrid catalysts based on sulfated zirconium oxide supported by zeolite of the Beta structural type were studied. The acid-base characteristics of the catalysts are determined by the amount of the supported component, the maximum concentration of Brønsted acid centers (277 μmol g–1) is reached upon deposition of 1.7 wt % sulfated zirconium oxide. The texture characteristics of the final catalyst are determined by the starting support. Tests of the catalysts in the reaction of isobutane alkylation with isobutylene demonstrated their advantage in selectivity and stability over the classical bulk sulfated zirconium oxide.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vlasov, E.A., Catal. Lett., 2015, vol. 145, no. 9, pp. 1651–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, A., J. Chinese Chem. Soc., 2010, no. 57, pp. 820–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busto, M., Fuel Process. Technol., 2012, vol. 104, pp. 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kustov, L.M., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2015, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 2006–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gizetdinova, A., J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 2014, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 453–460.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    US Patent 7 794 687 B2 (publ. 2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devyatkov, S.Y., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, vol. 55, no. 23, pp. 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emeis, C.A., J. Catal., 1993, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauna, M.R., Ceram.- Silik., 2015, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 318–325.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adebajo, M.O., Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2004, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qi, X., J. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 5626–5633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sing, K.S.W., Assessment of Mesoporosity, Elsevier, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye, F., Catal. Commun., 2009, vol. 10, pp. 2056–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feller, A., J. Catal., 2003, vol. 216, nos. 1–2, pp. 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salinas, A.L., Appl. Catal., A, 2008, vol. 336, nos. 1–2, pp. 313–323.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loenders, R., J. Catal., 1998, vol. 176, pp. 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Yuferova
    • 1
  • S. Yu. Devyatkov
    • 1
  • S. P. Fedorov
    • 1
  • K. V. Semikin
    • 1
  • D. A. Sladkovskii
    • 1
  • N. V. Kuzichkin
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Petersburg State Technological Institute (Technical University)St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations