Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry

, Volume 90, Issue 10, pp 1568–1571 | Cite as

Formation and Properties of Nickel–Phosphorus–Graphite Composite Coatings in Autocatalytic Deposition

  • E. G. Vinokurov
  • A. A. Abrashov
  • Kh. A. Nevmyatullina
  • T. A. Vagramyan
Inorganic Synthesis and Industrial Inorganic Chemistry
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

It is shown that nickel–phosphorus–graphite composite coatings can be deposited by the autocatalytic deposition method. The optimal concentration of graphite and the duration of ultrasonic treatment of a graphite suspension in solution for deposition of composite coatings based on the nickel–phosphorus alloy were determined. The influence exerted by thermal treatment parameters on the properties of the deposits was examined. The optimal process conditions are suggested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ginzburg, B.M., Shibaev, L.A., Kireenko, O.F., et al., Polymer Science, Ser. A, 2005, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 160–168.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CN Patent 101 705 480 A (publ. 2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdel Hamid, Z., Ghanem, W.A., and Abo El Enin, S.A., Surf. Interface Anal., 2005, no. 37, p. 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Speshilov, I.O., Vartanyan, M.A., Abrashov, A.A., and Vagramyan, T.A., Steklo Keram., 2015, no. 12, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CN Patent 103 695 877 A (publ. 2014).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CN Patent 101 660 145 A (publ. 2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tseluikin, V.N., Tolstova, I.V., Solov’eva, N.D., et al., Gal’vanotekh. Obrab. Poverkhn., 2006, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CN Patent 103 556 138 A (publ. 2014).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tseluikin, V.N., Solov’eva, N.D., Yakovlev, A.V., et al., Perspekt. Mater., 2009, no. 2, pp. 85–87.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahn, J.H., Shin, H.S., Kim, Y.J., et. al., J. Alloys Compd., 2007, no. 434, pp. 428–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mananth Kumar, Ramesh Chandra Agarwala, and Vijaya Agarwala, Bull. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drovosekov, A.B., Ivanov, M.V., Polyakova, O.A., and Tsupak, T.E., Gal’vanotekh. Obrab. Poverkhn., 2011, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorelov, S.M., Tsupak, T.E., Vinokurov, E.G., et al., Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf., 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 622–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skopintsev, V.D., Vinokurov, E.G., and Firsova, T.D., Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2015, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 1976–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Myshkin, N.K., Grigor’ev, A.Ya., and Gutsev, D.M., Trenie Iznos, 2010, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 544–551.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vinokurov, E.G., Morgunov, A.V., Zhigunov, F.N., and Skopintsev, V.D., Gal’vanotekh. Obrab. Poverkhn., 2015, vol. 23, no. 3, pp.40–46.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    CN Patent 104 947 096 A (publ. 2015).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vinokurov, E.G., Morgunov, A.V., and Skopintsev, V.D., Inorg. Mater., 2015, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 788–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM B117–11, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrushova, O.Yu., Tsupak, T.E., Krutskikh, V.M., et al., Gal’vanotekh. Obrab. Poverkhn., 2015, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. Vinokurov
    • 1
  • A. A. Abrashov
    • 1
  • Kh. A. Nevmyatullina
    • 1
  • T. A. Vagramyan
    • 1
  1. 1.Dmitry Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of RussiaMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations