Advertisement

Russian Journal of General Chemistry

, Volume 87, Issue 12, pp 3093–3096 | Cite as

Bicomponent Catalysts for Ethanol Dehydrogenation

  • Е. A. Ponomareva
  • T. O. Oladapo
  • Е. V. Egorova
Selected articles originally published in Russian in Rossiiskii Khimicheskii Zhurnal (Russian Chemistry Journal)

Abstract

Comparison of the catalytic activities of copper, copper‒chromium, and copper‒zirconium on activated carbon fiber systems was carried out. Component distribution and phase constitution of the catalysts were investigated by XRD and SEM. The copper-supported catalyst proved to be the most selective for the dehydrogenation of ethanol to form acetaldehyde, while the copper‒chromium-supported catalyst was shown to be more active above 300°С.

Keywords

ethanol dehydrogenation copper catalyst 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gallo, J.M.R., Bueno, J.M.C., and Schuchardt, U., J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2014, vol. 25, no. 12, p. 2229.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryashentseva, M.A., Egorova, E.V., Trusov, A.I., Nougmanov, E. R., and Antonyuk, S.N., Russ. Chem. Rev., 2006, vol. 75, no. 11, p. 1003. doi 10.1070/RC2006v075n11ABEH003627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iwasa, N., Yamamoto, O., Tamura, R., Nishikubo, M., and Takezawa, N., Catal. Lett., 1999, vol. 62, nos. 2–4, p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheng, P.Y., Chiu, W.W., Yee, A., Morrison, S.J., and Idriss, H., Catal. Today, 2007, vol. 129, p. 313. doi 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magaeva, A.A., Lyamina, G.V., Sudakova, N.N., Shilyaeva, L.P., and Vodyankina, O.V., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2007, vol. 81, no. 10, p. 1613. doi 10.1134/S0036024407100123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chladeck, P., Croiset, E., Epling, W., Hudgins, R.R., Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2007, vol. 85, p. 917. doi 10.1002/cjce.5450850613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rioux, R.M. and Vannice, M.A., J. Catal., 2003, vol. 216, p. 362. doi 10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00165-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang, F.-W., Yang, H.-C., Roselin, L.S., and Kuo, W.-Y., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2006, vol. 304, p. 30. doi 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sato, A.G., Volanti, D.P., Meira, D.M., Damyanova, S., and Longo, E., J. Catal., 2013, vol. 307, p. 1. doi 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.06.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carotenuto, G., Tesser, R., Di Serio, M., and Santacesaria, E., Catal. Today, 2013, vol. 203, p. 202. doi 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanoun, N., Astier, M.P., and Pajonk, G.M., J. Mol. Catal., 1993, vol. 79, p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tu, Y.-J. and Chen, Y.W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, vol. 37, p. 2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ponomareva, E.A., Egorova, E.V., Bokarev, D.A., and Parasraev, A.S., Vestn. Mosk. Inst. Tonkoi Khim. Tekhnol., 2013, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 20.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu, Y.-J., Li, C., and Chen, Y.-W., J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1994, vol. 59, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freitas, I.C., Damyanova, S., Oliveira, D.C., Marques, C.M.P., and Bueno, J.M.C., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2014, vol. 381, p. 26. doi 10.1016/j.molcata.2013.09.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato, A.G., Volanti, D.P., Freitas, I.C., Longo, E., and Bueno, J.M.C., Catal. Commun., 2012, vol. 26, p. 122. doi 10.1016/j.catcom.2012.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Е. A. Ponomareva
    • 1
  • T. O. Oladapo
    • 1
  • Е. V. Egorova
    • 1
  1. 1.Lomonosov State University of Fine Chemical TechnologiesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations