Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Influence of Clear Fellings on the Bryophyte Component of the Broad-leaved Forests of the Bashkir Cis-Ural Region

  • E. Z. Baisheva
  • P. S. Shirokikh
  • V. B. Martynenko
  • B. M. Mirkin
Article

Abstract

The change in the composition of the bryophyte component of succession communities that occur in the process of natural regeneration at the site of clear felling of the indigenous elm—maple–linden forests of the Bashkir Cis-Ural Region has been studied. The vulnerability of species to the consequences of felling is affected by their substrate confinement, ecological amplitude in relation to the factors of temperature, humidity, variability of soil moisture, and type of life strategy. In the secondary aspen forests, the absence or low constancy of nemoral epiphytic and ground mosses was noted.

Keywords

bryophytes felling regenerative succession broad-leaved forests Cis-Ural Region 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shirokikh, P.S., Martynenko, V.B., and Kunafin, A.M., Experience in syntaxonomic and ordination analysis of progressive succession in cutover areas of boreal light conifer forests in the Southern Urals, Russ. J. Ecol., 2013, vol. 44, no. 34, pp. 185–192. doi 10.1134/ S1067413613030120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ivanova, N., Differentiation of forest vegetation after clearcuttings in the Ural Montains, Modern Appl. Sci., 2014, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 195–203. doi 10.5539/mas.v8n6p195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martynenko, V.B., Shirokikh, P.S., Mirkin, B.M., and Naumova, L.G., Syntaxonomic analysis of restorative successions after cutting down light coniferous forests of South Ural Region, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2014, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 478–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martínez, I., Carreño, F., Escudero, A., and Rubio, A., Are threatened lichen species well-protected in Spain? Effectiveness of a protected areas network, Biol. Conserv., 2006, vol. 133, pp. 500–511. doi 10.1016/j.biocon. 2006.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baisheva, E.Z., Shirokikh, P.S., and Martynenko, V.B., Effect of clear-cutting on bryophytes in the pine forests of the South Urals, Arctoa, 2015, vol. 24, pp. 547–555. doi 10.15298/arctoa.24.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pharo, E.J. and Zartman, C.E., Bryophytes in a changing landscape: The hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes, Biol. Conserv., 2007, vol. 135, pp. 315–325. doi 10.1016/ j.biocon.2006.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rudolphi, J. and Gustafsson, L., Forest regenerating after clear-cutting function as habitat for bryophyte and lichen species of conservation concern, PLoS ONE, 2011, vol. 6, no. 4, e18639. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0018639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gorchakovskii, P.L., Thje vegetation and botanical geographic zonation of the Bashkir Autonomous Republic, in Opredelitel’ vysshikh rastenii Bashkirskoi ASSR (Identification Key to Higher Plants of the Bashkir Autonomous Republic), Kucherov, E.V. and Muldashev, A.A., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhudova, P.P., Geobotanicheskoe raionirovanie Bashkirskoi ASSR (Geobotanical Zonation of the Bashkir Autonomous Republic), Ufa, 1966.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foster, B.L. and Tilman, D., Dynamic and static views of succession: Testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach, Plant Ecol., 2000, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 1–10. doi 10.1023/A:1009895103017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aleksandrova, V.D., Analysis of successions of vegetation, in Polevaya geobotanika (Field Geobotany), vol. 3, Lavrenko, E.M. and Korchagin, A.A., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1964, pp. 300–447.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korchagin, A.A., Determination of tree age at temperate latitudes, in Polevaya geobotanika (Field Geobotany), vol. 2, Lavrenko, E.M. and Korchagin, A.A., Eds., Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, pp. 209–240.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    During, H.J., Ecological classifications of bryophytes and lichens, in Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Bates, J.W. and Farmer, A.M., Eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsyganov, D.N., Fitoindikatsiya ekologicheskikh rezhimov v podzone khvoino-shirokolistvennykh lesov (Phytoindication of Ecological Regimes in the Conifer–Broadleaf Forest Subzone), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shirokikh, P.S. and Zverev, A.A., Some results of correcting D.N. Tsyganov’s ecological scales for the Southern Ural region, in Sb. statei i lektsii IV Vseross. shkoly-konferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy geobotaniki” (Current Problems in Geobotany: Collected Papers and Lectures of VI All-Russia Conf.), Ufa: MediaPrint, 2012, pp. 551–556.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hennekens, S.M. and Scaminėe, J.H.J., TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data, J. Veget. Sci., 2001, vol. 12, pp. 589–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tichý, L., Holt, J., and Nejezchlebová, M., JUICE. Program for Management, Analysis and Classification of Ecological Data, 2nd ed., Brno: Masaryk Univ. Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cherepanov, S.K., Sosudistye rasteniya Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv (v predelakh byvshego SSSR) (Vascular Plants of Russia and Neighboring States of the Former Soviet Union), St. Petersburg: Mir i Sem’ya, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ignatov, M.S., Afonina, O.M., Ignatova, E.A., et al., Check-list of mosses of East Europe and North Asia, Arctoa, 2006, vol. 15, pp. 1–130. doi 10.15298/arctoa. 15.01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Konstantinova, N.A. Bakalin, V.A., et al., Checklist of liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of Russia, Arctoa, 2009, vol. 18, pp. 1–64. doi 10.15298/arctoa.18.01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mirkin, B.M. and Naumova, L.G., Sovremennoe sostoyanie osnovnykh kontseptsii nauki o rastitel’nosti (The Science of Vegetation: Current State of Basic Concepts), Ufa: Gilem, 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gorchakovskii, P.L., Shirokolistvennye lesa i ikh mesto v rastitel’nom pokrove Yuzhnogo Urala (Broadleaf Forests and Their Place in the Vegetation of the Southern Urals), Moscow: Nauka, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martynenko, V.B., Mirkin, B.M., and Muldashev, A.A., Syntaxonomy of Southern Ural forests as a basis for the system of their protection, Russ. J. Ecol., 2008, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 459–465. doi 10.1134/S1067413608070011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baisheva, E.Z., Martynenko, V.B., and Shirokikh, P.S., Mokhoobraznye lesnykh ekosistem Respubliki Bashkortostan (Bryophyts in Forest Ecosystems of Bashkortostan), Ufa: Gilem, 2015.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bogdanov, P.L., Dendrologiya (Dendrology), Moscow: Lesnaya Promyshlennost’, 1974.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vostochnoevropeiskie lesa: istoriya v golotsene i sovremennost’ (Eastern European Forests: Holocene History and Present Status), Smirnov, O.V., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Z. Baisheva
    • 1
  • P. S. Shirokikh
    • 1
  • V. B. Martynenko
    • 1
  • B. M. Mirkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Ufa Institute of BiologyRussian Academy of SciencesUfaRussia

Personalised recommendations