Skip to main content
Log in

Contemporary Trend in Erosion of Arable Ordinary Chernozems (Haplic Chernozems (Pachic)) within the Volga Upland (Saratov Oblast, Russia)

  • SOIL ЕROSION
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current trend in erosion rate of ordinary chernozems in Saratov oblast has been assessed. Detailed studies have been performed in a small catchment area of the Bolshoi Kolyshley River (Medveditsa River basin) using the radiocesium and soil-morphological methods. Data of long-term hydrometeorological observations in the region, reported results of observations of water runoff and soil loss on the runoff plots of the South-Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture (Saratov oblast), results of analysis of the grain size and mineral composition of stratozems developed on the catchment valley bottom were also used for analysis. The quantification of sedimentation rate in the valley bottom during two time windows (1963–1986 and 1986–2017) based on the sediment dating using 137Cs as a chronomarker indicates their decrease at least in 4–6 times after 1986, which points to a proportional reduction in erosion rate on the plowed slopes of the catchment area. The analysis of the temporal variability of suspended yields in the regional rivers (Medveditsa and Khopyor) during the period from 1940 to the present time allows us to draw an analogous conclusion for the Volga Upland within Saratov oblast. The decrease in the erosion rate of ordinary chernozems could be mainly caused by the reduction in water runoff from slopes during the spring snowmelt because of reduction in soil freezing depth against the background of rising air temperature in winter and spring. This decrease in erosion rate during the snowmelt period was not balanced by the regional increase in rainfall erosion related to some increase in the rate of runoff-forming rainfalls. In the part of Saratov oblast, located within the Volga Upland, where the studied catchment is situated, on the contrary, even a reduction in the frequency of rains with a rainfall depth of more than 30 mm occurred over the last decades. The reduction in the cultivated land area since the late 1980s because of the abandonment of plowlands on the steepest slopes also contributed to the decrease in total soil loss by erosion at the river basin scale. Within the studied small catchment, the share of perennial grasses in crop rotations increased after 1986, which also led to reduction of the rate of erosion of ordinary chernozems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2012–2016, the crop structure in the Atkarskii district of Saratov oblast was as follows: cereal and pulse crops (wheat, oat, corn, etc.), 53%; technical crops and vegetables (sunflower, camelina, potato), 41%; forage crops, 5%; and other crops and fallows, 1% [24].

  2. The increase in the low-water runoff in the river is hard to be largely explained by an increase in the amount of atmospheric precipitation in the river basin. For summer precipitation, its total decrease was even noted for the last 50 years.

  3. From the satellite images of the area with the studied catchment, crops were gotten there in the early or middle August until the early 1990s. Before 1986, the average monthly precipitation ≥30 mm was maximum in this month and showed a tendency of the most pronounced decrease. This fact could favor an additional decrease in the soil loss rate (along with that in spring). Since the early 1990s, harvesting has already been operated in early September, when a significant increase in precipitation was observed. This fact, on the contrary, could slightly enhance soil erosion in fall.

  4. Generally, high η values in the Medveditsa River compared to the Khopyor River indicate a higher agrogenic erosion of soils in the former river basin, although both basins occur under almost similar climatic conditions and the mean long-term annual water runoff depth in the Medveditsa River basin is even lower than in the Khopyor River basin. The large sediment yield in the Medveditsa River (12.6 t/(km2 year) in 1950–1975 and 4.3 t/(km2 year) in 2008–2015) is also favored by the predominance of better erodible loessial deposits of the Late Pliocene on the left part of the basin, while less erodible loamy–loamy sandy deposits of the Early Eopleistocene prevail on the right part of the Medveditsa River basin and in the Khopyor basin (6–8 t/(km2 year) in 1950–1975 and 1.3–1.8 t/(km2 year) in 2008–2015) [14].

REFERENCES

  1. A. V. Apukhtin and M. V. Kumani, “Recent changes in the conditions of spring floods of rivers in the Kursk region,” Uch. Zap. Kursk. Gos. Univ., No. 1, 300–311 (2012).

  2. Atlas of Radioactive Pollution of European Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine, Ed. by Yu. A. Izrael’ (Roskartografiya, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas of Saratov Oblast, Ed. by M. A. Shabanov (General Council of Geodesy and Cartography, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. T. Barabanov, Agricultural Forest Melioration in Soil Protective Farming (All-Russia Scientific Research Institute of Agroforest Reclamation, Volgograd, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. N. Golosov, “A quantitative assessment of deposits' redistribution in the upper links of fluvial network: achievements and problems,” Geomorfologiya 3, 29–36 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. N. Golosov, V. R. Belyaev, M. V. Markelov, and E. N. Shamshurina, “Specifics of sediment redistribution within a small arable catchment during different periods of its cultivation (Gracheva Loshchina catchment, Kursk oblast),” Geomorfologiya, No. 1, 25–35 (2012). doi 10.15356/0435-4281-2012-1-25-35

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. N. Golosov, A. N. Gennadiev, K. R. Olson, M. V. Markelov, A. P. Zhidkin, Yu. G. Chendev, and R. G. Kovach, “Spatial and temporal features of soil erosion in the forest-steppe zone of the East European Plain,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (7), 794–801 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. N. Golosov, N. N. Ivanova, A. V. Gusarov, and A. G. Sharifullin, “Assessment of the trend of degradation of arable soils on the basis of data on the rate of stratozem development obtained with the use of 137Cs as a chronomarker,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50 (7), 1195–1208 (2017). doi 10.1134/S1064229317100039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Gusarov, “The main regularities of the ratio between riverbed and basin components of erosion and suspended sediment flux in the Northern Eurasia’s river basins,” Geomorfologiya, No. 4, 3–20 (2015). doi 10.15356/0435-4281-2015-4-3-20

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Gusarov, V. N. Golosov, A. G. Sharifullin, and A. M. Gafurov, “Contemporary trend in erosion of arable southern chernozems (Haplic Chernozems Pachic) in the west of Orenburg oblast (Russia),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 561–575 (2018). doi 10.1134/ S1064229318050046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. P. Dedkov and V. I. Mozzherin, Erosion and Sediment Yield on the Earth (Kazan State Univ., Kazan, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. A. Ivanov, A. V. Prishchepov, V. N. Golosov, R. R. Zalyaliev, K. V. Efimov, A. A. Kondrat’eva, A. D. Kinyashova, and Yu. K. Ionova, “Changes in cropland area in the river basins of the European part of Russia for the period 1985–2015 as a factor of soil erosion dynamics,” Sovrem. Probl. Distants. Zondir. Zemli Kosm. 14 (6), 149–157 (2017). doi 10.21046/2070-7401-2017-14-6-149-157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. F. Ivanova and N. G. Levitskaya, “Changes in annual precipitation structure and soil water regime in the Saratov region,” Izv. Sarat. Univ., Ser. Nauki Zemle 15 (1), 11–15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Map of Quaternary Formations in the Russian Federation, Scale 1 : 2500000, Ed. by O. V. Petrov, A. F. Morozov, et al. (Rosnedra, VSEGEI, VNIIOkeanologia, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  15. M. A. Komissarov and I. M. Gabbasova, “Snowmelt-induced soil erosion on gentle slopes in the southern Cis-Ural region,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 598–607 (2014). doi 10.1134/S1064229314060039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. G. Levitskaya, I. I. Demakina, and A. Yu. Verin, “Assessment of the dynamics of atmospheric precipitation in Saratov oblast,” in Proceedings of the All-Russia Scientific Conference Devoted to the 45th Anniversary of the All-Russia Research Institute of Arable Farming and Soil Erosion Control “Soil-Protective Farming in Russia,” Kursk, September 2015 (All-Russia Research Institute of Arable Farming and Soil Erosion Control, Kursk, 2015), pp. 184–188.

  17. L. F. Litvin, Geography of Soil Erosion of Agricultural Lands in Russia (Akademkniga, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. F. Litvin, Z. P. Kiryukhina, S. F. Krasnov, and N. G. Dobrovol’skaya, “Dynamics of agricultural soil erosion in European Russia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50 (11), 1344–1353 (2017). doi 10.1134/S1064229317110084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. V. Markelov, V. N. Golosov, and V. R. Belyaev, “Changes in the sedimentation rates on the floodplains of small rivers in the Central Russian Plain,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., No. 5, 70–76 (2012).

  20. I. F. Medvedev, N. G. Levitskaya, V. Z. Makarov, and V. A. Nazarov, “The results of monitoring of erosion processes on chernozems in the Volga region,” Agrar. Nauch. Zh., No. 8, 29–34 (2016).

  21. I. F. Medvedev and A. I. Shabaev, “Erosion of arable land on the Volga Upland,” Pochvovedenie, No. 11, 61–69 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Yu. Necheporuk, “Mechanization of agriculture in Saratov oblast during the intensification of agricultural production: 1965–1975,” Vestn. Chelyab. Gos. Univ., No. 6 (297), 82–86 (2013).

  23. V. V. Popova and I. A. Polyakova, “Change of stable snow cover destruction dates in Northern Eurasia, 1936–2008: impact of global warming and the role of large-scale atmospheric circulation,” Ice and Snow, No. 53 (2), 29–39 (2013). doi 10.15356/2076-6734-2013-2-29-39

    Google Scholar 

  24. Planted Area of Agricultural Crops, Russian Federal State Statistics Service. https://fedstat.ru/. Accessed December 12, 2017. [in Russian].

  25. Planted Area in the Soviet Union: Statistical Bulletin (State Statistical Publ., Moscow, 1957), Vol. 1. [in Russian].

  26. Planted Area in the Soviet Union: Statistical Bulletin (State Statistical Publ., Moscow, 1957), Vol. 2. [in Russian].

  27. Agriculture in Saratov blast, AB-Tsentr. http://ab-centre.ru/page/selskoe-hozyaystvo-saratovskoy-oblasti/. Accessed November 15, 2017.

  28. Agriculture in the Soviet Union: Statistical Bulletin (Finansy i Statistika, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

  29. N. L. Frolova, M. B. Kireeva, S. A. Agafonova, V. M. Evstigneev, N. A. Efremova, and E. S. Povalishnikova, “Lowland rivers runoff within-year distribution and changes on the European territory of Russia,” Vodn. Khoz. Ross.: Probl., Tekhnol., Uprav., No. 4, 4–20 (2015).

  30. A. B. Shmakin and V. V. Popova, “Dynamics of climate extremes in Northern Eurasia in the late 20th century,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 42, 138–147 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ecological Resource Atlas of Saratov Oblast, Ed. by V. S. Belova and G. I. Khudyakova (Roskartografiya, Saratov, 1996) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Almgren and M. Isaksson, “Vertical migration studies of 137Cs from nuclear weapons fallout and the Chernobyl accident,” J. Environ. Radioact. 91, 90–102 (2006). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. G. Appleby, “Three decades of dating recent sediments by fallout radionuclides: a review,” Holocene 18, 83–93 (2008). doi 10.1177/0959683607085598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Benmansour, L. Mabit, A. Nouira, R. Moussadek, H. Bouksirate, M. Duchemin, and A. Benkdad, “Assessment of soil erosion and deposition rates in a Moroccan agricultural field using fallout 137Cs and 210Pbex,” J. Environ. Radioact. 115, 97–106 (2013). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. L. Beuselinck, A. Steegen, G. Govers, J. Nachtergaele, I. Takken, and J. Poesen, “Characteristics of sediment deposits formed by intense rainfall events in small catchments in the Belgian Loam Belt,” Geomorphology 32, 69–82 (2000). doi 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00068-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. E. A. Buraeva, O. S. Bezuglova, V. V. Stasov, V. S. Nefedov, E. V. Dergacheva, A. A. Goncharenko, S. V. Martynenko, L. Y. Goncharova, S. N. Gorbov, V. S. Malyshevsky, and T. V. Varduny, “Features of 137Cs distribution and dynamics in the main soils of the steppe zone in the southern European Russia,” Geoderma 259–260, 259–270 (2015). doi 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. De Cort, G. Dubois, Sh. D. Fridman, M. G. Germenchuk, Yu. A. Izrael, A. Janssens, A. R. Jones, G. N. Kelly, E. V. Kvansikova, I. I. Matveenko, I. M. Nazarov, Yu. M. Pokumeiko, V. A. Sitak, E. D. Stukin, L. Ya. Tabachny, et al., The Atlas of Cesium Deposition on Europe after the Chernobyl Accident (European Communities, Luxembourg, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  38. V. N. Golosov, V. R. Belyaev, and M. V. Markelov, “Application of Chernobyl-derived 137Cs fallout for sediment redistribution studies: lessons from European Russia,” Hydrol. Process. 27, 781–794 (2013). doi 10.1002/hyp.9470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. V. Golosov, A. Gusarov, L. Litvin, O. Yermolaev, N. Chizhikova, G. Safina, and Z. Kiryukhina, “Evaluation of soil erosion rates in the southern half of the Russian Plain: methodology and initial results,” Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 375, 23–27 (2017). doi 10.5194/piahs-375-23-2017

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. N. Golosov, D. E. Walling, A. V. Konoplev, M. M. Ivanov, and A. G. Sharifullin, “Application of bomb- and Chernobyl-derived radiocaesium for reconstructing changes in erosion rates and sediment fluxes from croplands in areas of European Russia with different levels of Chernobyl fallout,” J. Environ. Radioact. 186, 78–89 (2018). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Jweda and M. Baskaran, “Interconnected riverine-lacustrine systems as sedimentary repositories: case study in southeast Michigan using 210Pb and 137Cs-based sediment accumulation and mixing models,” J. Great Lakes Res. 37 (3), 432–446 (2011). doi 10.1016/j.jglr.2011.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. G. Kirchner, F. Strebl, P. Bossew, S. Ehlken, and M. H. Gerzabek, “Vertical migration of radionuclides in undisturbed grassland soils,” J. Environ. Radioact. 100, 716–720 (2009). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. L. Mabit, M. Benmansour, and D. E. Walling, “Comparative advantages and limitations of the fallout radionuclides 137Cs, 210Pbex and 7Be for assessing soil erosion and sedimentation,” J. Environ. Radioact. 99, 1799–1807 (2008). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. H. Madsen, D. Lawrence, M. Lang, M. Martinkova, and T. R. Kjeldsen, “Review of trend analysis and climate change projections of extreme precipitation and floods in Europe,” J. Hydrol. 519, 3634–3650 (2014). doi 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. P. N. Owens, D. E. Walling, J. Shanahan, and I. D. L. Foster, “The use of caesium-137 measurements to establish a sediment budget for the Start catchment, Devon, UK,” Hydrol. Sci. J. 42, 405–423 (1997). doi 10.1080/02626669709492037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. H. Park, A. B. Sherstiukov, A. N. Fedorov, I. V. Polyakov, and J. E. Walsh, “An observation-based assessment of the influences of air temperature and snow depth on soil temperature in Russia,” Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 064026 (2014). doi 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. P. Porto, D. E. Walling, C. Alewell, G. Callegari, L. Mabit, N. Mallimo, K. Meusburger, and M. Zehringer, “Use of a 137Cs re-sampling technique to investigate temporal changes in soil erosion and sediment mobilization for a small forested catchment in Southern Italy,” J. Environ. Radioact. 138, 137–148 (2014). doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Porto, D. E. Walling, C. La Spada, and C. Callegari, “Validating the use of 137Cs measurements to derive the slope component of the sediment budget of a small rangeland catchment in Southern Italy,” Land Degrad. Dev. 27, 798–810 (2016). doi 10.1002/ldr.2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Y. Sidorchuk and V. N. Golosov, “Erosion and sedimentation on the Russian Plain, II: The history of erosion and sedimentation during the period of intensive agriculture,” Hydrol. Process. 17, 3347–3358 (2003). doi 10.1002/hyp.1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. D. E. Walling, A. L. Collins, P. A. Jones, G. J. L. Leeks, and G. Old, “Establishing fine-grained sediment budgets for the Pang and Lambourn LOCAR catchments, UK,” J. Hydrol. 330, 126–141 (2006). doi 10.1016/ j.jhydrol.2006.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. F. Zapata, Handbook for the Assessment of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Using Environmental Radionuclides (Kluwer Acad. Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A.Z. Satdarov, A.M. Gafurov, and R.A. Medvedeva (PhD students, Kazan Federal University) for assistance in summer fieldwork in 2017.

The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 15-17-20006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Gusarov.

Additional information

Translated by K. Pankratova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gusarov, A.V., Sharifullin, A.G. & Golosov, V.N. Contemporary Trend in Erosion of Arable Ordinary Chernozems (Haplic Chernozems (Pachic)) within the Volga Upland (Saratov Oblast, Russia). Eurasian Soil Sc. 51, 1514–1532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318120049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318120049

Keywords:

Navigation