Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 467–478 | Cite as

Monitoring of Soil Contamination by Heavy Metals in the Impact Zone of Copper-Nickel Smelter on the Kola Peninsula

  • G. M. Kashulina
Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils


The results of landscape monitoring of the concentrations of acid-extractable Ni, Cu, Co, Mn, and Zn in soils of the local impact zone of the Severonikel industrial complex on the Kola Peninsula are discussed. The aim of monitoring studies was to reveal the spatial and temporal regularities of variation in the degree of soil contamination by heavy metals. In 2001–2011, the concentrations of acid-extractable compounds of the elements in the upper part of organic soil horizons around this plant exceeded their background concentrations by two orders of magnitude for Cu and Co and by three orders of magnitude for Ni. The degree of topsoil contamination with Ni, Cu, and Co generally corresponded to the distance of the plots from the contamination source and to the modern technogenic load. However, because of the long period of the emissions, their extreme amounts, and complex composition, indirect factors—the degree of technogenic soil degradation, the loss of soil organic matter, saturation of the surface soil layers by the contaminating metals, and competitive relationships between the elements—also affect soil contamination level. The concentrations of all the studied metals in the topsoil are characterized by considerable (1.5 to 7 times) variability in their long-term dynamics. The most important factors of this variability for Ni, Cu, and Co are the organic matter content of the samples and the amount of atmospheric precipitation in the year preceding the sampling. An inverse relationship between element concentrations in the soils and the amount of atmospheric precipitation attests to the dynamic nature and reversible character of the accumulation of heavy metals in the soils.


heavy metals long-term dynamics spatial distribution pattern ecological consequences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. A. Evdokimova, G. V. Kalabin, and N. P. Mozgova, “Contents and toxicity of heavy metals in soils of the zone affected by aerial emissions from the Severonikel Enterprise,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 237–244 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Kashulina, Aerotechnogenic Transformation of Soils in the European Subarctic Region (Kola Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. M. Kashulina, “Extreme pollution of soils by emissions of the copper–nickel industrial complex in the Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 837–849 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. M. Kashulina, A. N. Kubrak, and N. M. Korobeinikova, “Soil acidity status in the vicinity of the Severonikel copper-nickel industrial complex, Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 432–444 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. M. Kashulina, V. N. Pereverzev, and T. I. Litvinova, “Transformation of the soil organic matter under the extreme pollution by emissions of the Severonikel smelter,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43, 1174–1183 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. N. Koptsik, S. V. Koptsik, I. E. Smirnova, A. D. Kudryavtseva, and K. A. Turbabina, “The response of forest ecosystems to reduction in industrial atmospheric emission in the Kola Subarctic,” Zh. Obshch. Biol. 77 (2), 147–165 (2016).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. V. Lukina and T. V. Chernen’kova, “Pollutioninduced successions in forests of the Kola Peninsula,” Russ. J. Ecol. 39, 310–317 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. V. Nikonov, N. V. Lukina, and M. V. Frontas’eva, “Trace elements in Al–Fe-humus podzolic soils subjected to aerial pollution from the copper-nickel production industry in conditions of varying lithogenic background,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 32, 338–349 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. N. Pereverzev, Forest Soils of the Kola Peninsula (Nauka, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Ponomareva, Theory of Podzol-Forming Process (Nauka, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. V. Surkova, Chemistry of the Atmosphere (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Äyräs and G. Kashulina, “Regional patterns of element contents in the organic horizon of podzols in the central part of the Barents region (Finland, Norway, and Russia), with special reference to heavy metals (Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb, V and Zn) and sulphur as indicators of airborne pollution,” J. Explor. Geochem. 68, 127–144 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. de Caritat, C. Reimann, M. Äyräs, H. Niskavaara, V. A. Chekushin, and V. Pavlov, “Stream water geochemistry from selected catchments on the Kola Peninsula (NW Russia) and in neighboring areas of Finland and Norway: 2. Time-series,” Aquat. Geochem. 2, 69–84 (1996).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Gregurek, C. Reimann, and E. F. Stumpfl, “Mineralogical fingerprint of industrial emissions—an example from Ni mining and smelting on the Kola Peninsula, NW Russia,” Sci. Total Environ. 221, 189–200 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Johannessen and A. Henriksen, “Chemistry of snow meltwater: changes in concentration during melting,” Water Res. Res. 14, 615–619 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Kashulina, P. de Caritat, and C. Reimann, “Snow and rain chemistry around the Severonikel industrial complex, NW Russia: current status and retrospective analysis,” Atmos. Environ. 89, 672–682 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Reimann, G. Kashulina, P. de Caritat, and H. Niskavaara, “Multi-element, multi-medium regional geochemistry in the European Arctic: element concentration, variation and correlation,” Appl. Geochem. 16, 759–780 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Salminen, V. Chekushin, M. Tenhola, et al., “Geochemical atlas of eastern Barents region,” J. Geochem. Explor. 83, 1–3 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Avrorin Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, Kola Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesApatityRussia

Personalised recommendations